C

D. Tripathi, Helen E. Mason, Bhola N. Dwivedi, G. Zanna, P. R. Young
{"title":"C","authors":"D. Tripathi, Helen E. Mason, Bhola N. Dwivedi, G. Zanna, P. R. Young","doi":"10.1515/9783110580051-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The coronal magnetic configuration of an active region typically evolves quietly for a few days before becoming suddenly eruptive and launching a coronal mass ejection (CME). The precise origin of the eruption is still under debate. The loss of equilibrium, or an ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instability such as torus instability are among the several mechanisms that have proposed to be responsible for the sudden eruptions. Distinct approaches have also been formulated for limited cases having circular or translation symmetry. We revisit the previous theoretical approaches setting them in the same analytical framework. The coronal field results from the contribution of a non-neutralized current channel added to a background magnetic field, which in our model is the potential field generated by two photospheric flux concentrations. The evolution on short Alfvénic timescale is governed by ideal MHD. We first show analytically that the loss of equilibrium and the stability analysis are two different views of the same physical mechanism. Second, we identify that the same physics is involved in the instabilities of circular and straight current channels. Indeed, they are just two particular limiting cases of more general current paths. A global instability of the magnetic configuration is present when the current channel is located at a coronal height, h, large enough so that the decay index of the potential field, ∂ ln |Bp|/∂ ln h, is larger than a critical value. At the limit of very thin current channels, previous analysis has found critical decay indices of 1.5 and 1 for circular and straight current channels, respectively. However, with current channels being deformable and as thick as that expected in the corona, we show that this critical index has similar values for circular and straight current channels, and is typically in the range [1.1,1.3].","PeriodicalId":248733,"journal":{"name":"Kirchner – Abkürzungsverzeichnis der Rechtssprache","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C\",\"authors\":\"D. Tripathi, Helen E. Mason, Bhola N. Dwivedi, G. Zanna, P. R. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110580051-006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The coronal magnetic configuration of an active region typically evolves quietly for a few days before becoming suddenly eruptive and launching a coronal mass ejection (CME). The precise origin of the eruption is still under debate. The loss of equilibrium, or an ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instability such as torus instability are among the several mechanisms that have proposed to be responsible for the sudden eruptions. Distinct approaches have also been formulated for limited cases having circular or translation symmetry. We revisit the previous theoretical approaches setting them in the same analytical framework. The coronal field results from the contribution of a non-neutralized current channel added to a background magnetic field, which in our model is the potential field generated by two photospheric flux concentrations. The evolution on short Alfvénic timescale is governed by ideal MHD. We first show analytically that the loss of equilibrium and the stability analysis are two different views of the same physical mechanism. Second, we identify that the same physics is involved in the instabilities of circular and straight current channels. Indeed, they are just two particular limiting cases of more general current paths. A global instability of the magnetic configuration is present when the current channel is located at a coronal height, h, large enough so that the decay index of the potential field, ∂ ln |Bp|/∂ ln h, is larger than a critical value. At the limit of very thin current channels, previous analysis has found critical decay indices of 1.5 and 1 for circular and straight current channels, respectively. However, with current channels being deformable and as thick as that expected in the corona, we show that this critical index has similar values for circular and straight current channels, and is typically in the range [1.1,1.3].\",\"PeriodicalId\":248733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kirchner – Abkürzungsverzeichnis der Rechtssprache\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kirchner – Abkürzungsverzeichnis der Rechtssprache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110580051-006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kirchner – Abkürzungsverzeichnis der Rechtssprache","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110580051-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

活跃区域的日冕磁场结构通常在突然爆发并发射日冕物质抛射(CME)之前几天平静地演变。火山喷发的确切起源仍在争论中。失去平衡,或理想的磁流体动力学(MHD)不稳定性,如环面不稳定性,是导致突然爆发的几种机制之一。对于具有圆形对称或平移对称的有限情况,也制定了不同的方法。我们重新审视以前的理论方法,将它们置于相同的分析框架中。日冕场是由一个未中和的电流通道对背景磁场的贡献产生的,在我们的模型中,背景磁场是由两个光球通量浓度产生的势场。在短时间尺度上的演化是由理想的MHD控制的。我们首先从分析的角度表明,失平衡分析和稳定性分析是同一物理机制的两种不同观点。其次,我们发现圆形和直线电流通道的不稳定性涉及相同的物理特性。实际上,它们只是更一般的电流路径的两个特殊的极限情况。当电流通道位于一个足够大的日冕高度h,使得势场的衰减指数∂ln |Bp|/∂ln h大于一个临界值时,磁构型的全局不稳定性就出现了。在非常薄的电流通道的极限下,先前的分析发现圆形和直线型电流通道的临界衰减指数分别为1.5和1。然而,由于电流通道是可变形的,并且与日冕中预期的一样厚,我们表明,对于圆形和直线电流通道,该关键指标具有相似的值,并且通常在[1.1,1.3]范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
C
The coronal magnetic configuration of an active region typically evolves quietly for a few days before becoming suddenly eruptive and launching a coronal mass ejection (CME). The precise origin of the eruption is still under debate. The loss of equilibrium, or an ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instability such as torus instability are among the several mechanisms that have proposed to be responsible for the sudden eruptions. Distinct approaches have also been formulated for limited cases having circular or translation symmetry. We revisit the previous theoretical approaches setting them in the same analytical framework. The coronal field results from the contribution of a non-neutralized current channel added to a background magnetic field, which in our model is the potential field generated by two photospheric flux concentrations. The evolution on short Alfvénic timescale is governed by ideal MHD. We first show analytically that the loss of equilibrium and the stability analysis are two different views of the same physical mechanism. Second, we identify that the same physics is involved in the instabilities of circular and straight current channels. Indeed, they are just two particular limiting cases of more general current paths. A global instability of the magnetic configuration is present when the current channel is located at a coronal height, h, large enough so that the decay index of the potential field, ∂ ln |Bp|/∂ ln h, is larger than a critical value. At the limit of very thin current channels, previous analysis has found critical decay indices of 1.5 and 1 for circular and straight current channels, respectively. However, with current channels being deformable and as thick as that expected in the corona, we show that this critical index has similar values for circular and straight current channels, and is typically in the range [1.1,1.3].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信