分析2018年西苏门答腊、廖内省、占碑市和明古鲁市高中生物奥林匹克题的质量

Eka Aghnia Syarif, S. Syamsurizal
{"title":"分析2018年西苏门答腊、廖内省、占碑市和明古鲁市高中生物奥林匹克题的质量","authors":"Eka Aghnia Syarif, S. Syamsurizal","doi":"10.24036/BIOEDUCATIONJOURNAL/VOL3-ISS194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study to determine the quality of items in terms of analysis : 1) the validity of \ncontent and empirical, 2) reliability, 3) level of difficulty, 4) distinguishing features, and 5) \nthe function of detractors. This research is a descriptive study. The sample was a set of \nbiology olimpic question for senior high school year 2018/209 in West Sumatera, Riau, \nJambi, and Bengkulu. Quantitative analysis was performed by using Anates, while for the \nqualitative analysis carried out by the study table. Based on the results of data analysis, the \nresult for the review of aspects : 1) the validity of the content 52.5% are invalid matter, 2) \nreliability, the test has a value of 0.6 belong to the category enough, 3) the level of difficulty, \n1,6% classified as very easy matter, 1,6% easy, 36.6% about the medium, 41,6% about the \ndifficult, and 18.3% about the very difficult, 4) different power, 65% of matter which is \nclassified as very bad, 28.5% about the relatively ugly, 6.6% about enough, and 0% items \ngood, 5) function options, for options that are not qualified humbug is 36.6% and the quality \nis 63,3%. It can be concluded that the end of the senior high school biology \nolympiadquestions at West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu in 2018 through the 4.0 \nversion of Anates program not meet both criteria.","PeriodicalId":436899,"journal":{"name":"Bioeducation Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzed Quality of Senior High School Biology Olympiad Questions at West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu in 2018\",\"authors\":\"Eka Aghnia Syarif, S. Syamsurizal\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/BIOEDUCATIONJOURNAL/VOL3-ISS194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study to determine the quality of items in terms of analysis : 1) the validity of \\ncontent and empirical, 2) reliability, 3) level of difficulty, 4) distinguishing features, and 5) \\nthe function of detractors. This research is a descriptive study. The sample was a set of \\nbiology olimpic question for senior high school year 2018/209 in West Sumatera, Riau, \\nJambi, and Bengkulu. Quantitative analysis was performed by using Anates, while for the \\nqualitative analysis carried out by the study table. Based on the results of data analysis, the \\nresult for the review of aspects : 1) the validity of the content 52.5% are invalid matter, 2) \\nreliability, the test has a value of 0.6 belong to the category enough, 3) the level of difficulty, \\n1,6% classified as very easy matter, 1,6% easy, 36.6% about the medium, 41,6% about the \\ndifficult, and 18.3% about the very difficult, 4) different power, 65% of matter which is \\nclassified as very bad, 28.5% about the relatively ugly, 6.6% about enough, and 0% items \\ngood, 5) function options, for options that are not qualified humbug is 36.6% and the quality \\nis 63,3%. It can be concluded that the end of the senior high school biology \\nolympiadquestions at West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu in 2018 through the 4.0 \\nversion of Anates program not meet both criteria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioeducation Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioeducation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/BIOEDUCATIONJOURNAL/VOL3-ISS194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioeducation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/BIOEDUCATIONJOURNAL/VOL3-ISS194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是在分析方面确定项目的质量:1)内容效度和经验效度,2)信度,3)难易程度,4)区别特征,5)诋毁者的功能。本研究为描述性研究。样本是西苏门答腊、廖内省、占碑市和明古鲁市2018/209学年高中的一套生物奥林匹克问题。定量分析采用Anates进行,定性分析采用研究表进行。根据数据分析的结果,对结果进行了几个方面的审查:1)内容效度52.5%为无效事项,2)信度,该测试的值为0.6,属于足够类,3)难度等级,1,6%为极容易类,1,6%为简单类,36.6%为中等类,41,6%为困难类,18.3%为非常困难类,4)不同的力量,65%为极差类,28.5%为比较难看类,6.6%为一般类,0%为良好类,5)功能选项。对于不合格的选项,欺诈占36.6%,质量占63.3%。可以得出结论,通过4.0版本的Anates程序,2018年西苏门答腊,廖内省,占比和明古鲁的高中生物奥林匹克问题的结束不符合这两个标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzed Quality of Senior High School Biology Olympiad Questions at West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu in 2018
The aim of this study to determine the quality of items in terms of analysis : 1) the validity of content and empirical, 2) reliability, 3) level of difficulty, 4) distinguishing features, and 5) the function of detractors. This research is a descriptive study. The sample was a set of biology olimpic question for senior high school year 2018/209 in West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu. Quantitative analysis was performed by using Anates, while for the qualitative analysis carried out by the study table. Based on the results of data analysis, the result for the review of aspects : 1) the validity of the content 52.5% are invalid matter, 2) reliability, the test has a value of 0.6 belong to the category enough, 3) the level of difficulty, 1,6% classified as very easy matter, 1,6% easy, 36.6% about the medium, 41,6% about the difficult, and 18.3% about the very difficult, 4) different power, 65% of matter which is classified as very bad, 28.5% about the relatively ugly, 6.6% about enough, and 0% items good, 5) function options, for options that are not qualified humbug is 36.6% and the quality is 63,3%. It can be concluded that the end of the senior high school biology olympiadquestions at West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu in 2018 through the 4.0 version of Anates program not meet both criteria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信