风险偏好是动态的吗?冒险行为的主体内变异与背景音乐的关系

Marja-Liisa Halko, Markku Kaustia
{"title":"风险偏好是动态的吗?冒险行为的主体内变异与背景音乐的关系","authors":"Marja-Liisa Halko, Markku Kaustia","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1997520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates whether preference interactions can explain why risk preferences change over time and across contexts. We conduct an experiment in which subjects accept or reject gambles involving real money gains and losses. We introduce within-subject variation by alternating subjectively liked music and disliked music in the background. We find that favourite music increases risk-taking, and disliked music suppresses risk-taking, compared to a baseline of no music. Several theories in psychology propose mechanisms by which mood affects risktaking, but none of them fully explain our results. The results are, however, consistent with preference complementarities that extend to risk preference.","PeriodicalId":339382,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Rationality","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Risk-Preferences Dynamic? Within-Subject Variation in Risk-Taking as a Function of Background Music\",\"authors\":\"Marja-Liisa Halko, Markku Kaustia\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1997520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates whether preference interactions can explain why risk preferences change over time and across contexts. We conduct an experiment in which subjects accept or reject gambles involving real money gains and losses. We introduce within-subject variation by alternating subjectively liked music and disliked music in the background. We find that favourite music increases risk-taking, and disliked music suppresses risk-taking, compared to a baseline of no music. Several theories in psychology propose mechanisms by which mood affects risktaking, but none of them fully explain our results. The results are, however, consistent with preference complementarities that extend to risk preference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORG: Rationality\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORG: Rationality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1997520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORG: Rationality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1997520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文研究偏好相互作用是否可以解释为什么风险偏好随时间和不同背景而变化。我们进行了一项实验,实验对象接受或拒绝涉及真钱收益和损失的赌博。我们通过在背景中交替播放主观上喜欢和不喜欢的音乐来引入主题内的变化。我们发现,与没有音乐的基线相比,最喜欢的音乐会增加冒险精神,而不喜欢的音乐会抑制冒险精神。心理学上的一些理论提出了情绪影响冒险的机制,但没有一个能完全解释我们的结果。然而,结果与扩展到风险偏好的偏好互补性一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Risk-Preferences Dynamic? Within-Subject Variation in Risk-Taking as a Function of Background Music
This paper investigates whether preference interactions can explain why risk preferences change over time and across contexts. We conduct an experiment in which subjects accept or reject gambles involving real money gains and losses. We introduce within-subject variation by alternating subjectively liked music and disliked music in the background. We find that favourite music increases risk-taking, and disliked music suppresses risk-taking, compared to a baseline of no music. Several theories in psychology propose mechanisms by which mood affects risktaking, but none of them fully explain our results. The results are, however, consistent with preference complementarities that extend to risk preference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信