俄罗斯政治博客圈中诋毁对手的交际策略

L. Balakhonskaya, V. I. Strelchenko, V. V. Balakhonsky, Tatyana A. Sadretdinova, Iuliia V. Beresneva
{"title":"俄罗斯政治博客圈中诋毁对手的交际策略","authors":"L. Balakhonskaya, V. I. Strelchenko, V. V. Balakhonsky, Tatyana A. Sadretdinova, Iuliia V. Beresneva","doi":"10.1109/ComSDS49898.2020.9101281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maintaining a network diary (blog) requires certain communication skills from the author, which are based on the pragmatic principles of cooperative cooperation and politeness. However, in cases where it is necessary to attract the attention of the audience, “heat up interest, elicit an emotional reaction, tend subscribers to their side, forming certain opinions and judgments, bloggers can resort to a defamation type of speech behavior based on speech aggression. Aggressiveness directed against competitors in political struggle is an ontological property of political communication, so it is no accident in the political blogosphere that one of the leading communicative strategies based on speech aggression is the strategy of discrediting opponents.The article is devoted to analysis of the discrediting opponents’ strategy in posts published in the section “Blogs” on the website of the radio station “Echo of Moscow”, identification of appropriate tactics and language means of discrediting.The discourse analysis of blogs using linguostilistic and lingvoideological analysis of text’s language units showed that the desire of the subject of political communication to discredit the opponent can be embodied by the following communicative tactics: unsubstantiated accusation, insult, derision, irony and sarcasm, deliberate exaggeration of any shortcomings, negative characterization of the professional competences of the opponent, rejection of the actions committed or planned by him, criticism of the opinions and judgments expressed, labeling, negative forecast of the development of events, intimidation or threat, false definition, negative comparison, etc.","PeriodicalId":337761,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS)","volume":"352 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicative Strategy of Discrediting Opponents in the Russian Political Blogosphere\",\"authors\":\"L. Balakhonskaya, V. I. Strelchenko, V. V. Balakhonsky, Tatyana A. Sadretdinova, Iuliia V. Beresneva\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ComSDS49898.2020.9101281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maintaining a network diary (blog) requires certain communication skills from the author, which are based on the pragmatic principles of cooperative cooperation and politeness. However, in cases where it is necessary to attract the attention of the audience, “heat up interest, elicit an emotional reaction, tend subscribers to their side, forming certain opinions and judgments, bloggers can resort to a defamation type of speech behavior based on speech aggression. Aggressiveness directed against competitors in political struggle is an ontological property of political communication, so it is no accident in the political blogosphere that one of the leading communicative strategies based on speech aggression is the strategy of discrediting opponents.The article is devoted to analysis of the discrediting opponents’ strategy in posts published in the section “Blogs” on the website of the radio station “Echo of Moscow”, identification of appropriate tactics and language means of discrediting.The discourse analysis of blogs using linguostilistic and lingvoideological analysis of text’s language units showed that the desire of the subject of political communication to discredit the opponent can be embodied by the following communicative tactics: unsubstantiated accusation, insult, derision, irony and sarcasm, deliberate exaggeration of any shortcomings, negative characterization of the professional competences of the opponent, rejection of the actions committed or planned by him, criticism of the opinions and judgments expressed, labeling, negative forecast of the development of events, intimidation or threat, false definition, negative comparison, etc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS)\",\"volume\":\"352 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ComSDS49898.2020.9101281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ComSDS49898.2020.9101281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

维护网络日记(博客)需要作者具备一定的沟通技巧,这是基于合作合作和礼貌的语用原则。然而,在需要吸引受众注意力的情况下,“激起兴趣,引发情感反应,使订阅者站在自己一边,形成一定的意见和判断,博主可以采取基于言论攻击的诽谤型言论行为。”在政治斗争中针对竞争对手的攻击性是政治传播的本体论属性,因此,在政治博客圈中,基于言论攻击的主要传播策略之一是诋毁对手的策略,这并非偶然。本文致力于分析在“莫斯科回声”电台网站“博客”部分发表的文章中诋毁对手的策略,确定适当的诋毁策略和语言手段。运用语篇语言单位的语言学分析和语言意识形态分析对博客的话语分析表明,政治传播主体诋毁对手的愿望可以通过以下交际策略体现:未经证实的指控、侮辱、嘲笑、讽刺和讽刺、故意夸大任何缺点、对对手专业能力的负面描述、拒绝他所做或计划的行动、批评他所表达的意见和判断、贴标签、对事件发展的负面预测、恐吓或威胁、错误定义、负面比较等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communicative Strategy of Discrediting Opponents in the Russian Political Blogosphere
Maintaining a network diary (blog) requires certain communication skills from the author, which are based on the pragmatic principles of cooperative cooperation and politeness. However, in cases where it is necessary to attract the attention of the audience, “heat up interest, elicit an emotional reaction, tend subscribers to their side, forming certain opinions and judgments, bloggers can resort to a defamation type of speech behavior based on speech aggression. Aggressiveness directed against competitors in political struggle is an ontological property of political communication, so it is no accident in the political blogosphere that one of the leading communicative strategies based on speech aggression is the strategy of discrediting opponents.The article is devoted to analysis of the discrediting opponents’ strategy in posts published in the section “Blogs” on the website of the radio station “Echo of Moscow”, identification of appropriate tactics and language means of discrediting.The discourse analysis of blogs using linguostilistic and lingvoideological analysis of text’s language units showed that the desire of the subject of political communication to discredit the opponent can be embodied by the following communicative tactics: unsubstantiated accusation, insult, derision, irony and sarcasm, deliberate exaggeration of any shortcomings, negative characterization of the professional competences of the opponent, rejection of the actions committed or planned by him, criticism of the opinions and judgments expressed, labeling, negative forecast of the development of events, intimidation or threat, false definition, negative comparison, etc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信