大五人格和社交媒体类型对感知风险的作用

Fadjri Kirana Anggarani, Zahrina Mardhiyah, Claudia Rosari Dewi, Trisnia Rizqi Safithri, Sherly Rachma Andreina, Rizqi Maisaroh, Yovita Ajeng Pratiwi, Anjani Elmawati
{"title":"大五人格和社交媒体类型对感知风险的作用","authors":"Fadjri Kirana Anggarani, Zahrina Mardhiyah, Claudia Rosari Dewi, Trisnia Rizqi Safithri, Sherly Rachma Andreina, Rizqi Maisaroh, Yovita Ajeng Pratiwi, Anjani Elmawati","doi":"10.23917/indigenous.v7i2.18603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The infodemic spread during the last pandemic situation, and each individual's perceived risk varies based on the dominance of his/her personality. This study, therefore, aims to examine the effect of the Big-Five Personality and social media on the perceived risk in the vulnerable group. The number of subjects was 267 respondents from adolescence to late adulthood, with inclusion criteria: (1) active users of social media, (2) over 19 years old, and (3) approved informed consent. The research consisted of two study stages: quantitative and qualitative. The instruments used in the quantitative stage were (1) the social media questionnaire, (2) the Big-Five Inventory (BFI) scale, and (3) the perceived risk scale, while the instrument employed in the qualitative stage was an interview guideline with an open questionnaire. Then, quantitative data analysis used regression techniques, whereas qualitative ones utilized content technique analysis. As a result, the Big-Five Personality and the types of social media simultaneously and significantly affected perceived risk (p0.05). According to the qualitative method results, the information topic \"Covid-19 Data Case\" became a popular theme (37.83%), and the majority of respondents considered Covid-19 \"very risky\" (35.33%). In conclusion, neuroticism, YouTube, and WhatsApp have a role in perceived risk in vulnerable groups. On the other hand, YouTube posed the highest perceived risk compared to other social media. In addition, although the intensity of social media use did not affect perceived risk, the content about \"Covid-19 Case Data\" gave rise to the perception that Covid-19 was \"very risky.\"Keywords: big-five personality; infodemic; perceived risk; types of social media.","PeriodicalId":347936,"journal":{"name":"Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of big-five personality and types of social media on perceived risk\",\"authors\":\"Fadjri Kirana Anggarani, Zahrina Mardhiyah, Claudia Rosari Dewi, Trisnia Rizqi Safithri, Sherly Rachma Andreina, Rizqi Maisaroh, Yovita Ajeng Pratiwi, Anjani Elmawati\",\"doi\":\"10.23917/indigenous.v7i2.18603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The infodemic spread during the last pandemic situation, and each individual's perceived risk varies based on the dominance of his/her personality. This study, therefore, aims to examine the effect of the Big-Five Personality and social media on the perceived risk in the vulnerable group. The number of subjects was 267 respondents from adolescence to late adulthood, with inclusion criteria: (1) active users of social media, (2) over 19 years old, and (3) approved informed consent. The research consisted of two study stages: quantitative and qualitative. The instruments used in the quantitative stage were (1) the social media questionnaire, (2) the Big-Five Inventory (BFI) scale, and (3) the perceived risk scale, while the instrument employed in the qualitative stage was an interview guideline with an open questionnaire. Then, quantitative data analysis used regression techniques, whereas qualitative ones utilized content technique analysis. As a result, the Big-Five Personality and the types of social media simultaneously and significantly affected perceived risk (p0.05). According to the qualitative method results, the information topic \\\"Covid-19 Data Case\\\" became a popular theme (37.83%), and the majority of respondents considered Covid-19 \\\"very risky\\\" (35.33%). In conclusion, neuroticism, YouTube, and WhatsApp have a role in perceived risk in vulnerable groups. On the other hand, YouTube posed the highest perceived risk compared to other social media. In addition, although the intensity of social media use did not affect perceived risk, the content about \\\"Covid-19 Case Data\\\" gave rise to the perception that Covid-19 was \\\"very risky.\\\"Keywords: big-five personality; infodemic; perceived risk; types of social media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23917/indigenous.v7i2.18603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/indigenous.v7i2.18603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在上次大流行期间,信息流行传播,每个人的感知风险因其个性的主导地位而异。因此,本研究旨在探讨大五人格和社交媒体对弱势群体感知风险的影响。受试者数量为267名从青春期到成年晚期的受访者,纳入标准为:(1)活跃的社交媒体用户,(2)超过19岁,(3)批准知情同意。本研究分为定量研究和定性研究两个阶段。定量阶段使用的工具为:(1)社交媒体问卷、(2)大五量表(Big-Five Inventory, BFI)量表和(3)感知风险量表;定性阶段使用的工具为开放式问卷访谈指南。然后,定量数据分析使用回归技术,而定性使用内容技术分析。结果表明,大五人格和社交媒体类型同时显著影响感知风险(p0.05)。定性方法结果显示,信息话题“Covid-19数据案例”成为热门话题(37.83%),大多数受访者认为Covid-19“非常危险”(35.33%)。综上所述,神经质、YouTube和WhatsApp在弱势群体的感知风险中发挥了作用。另一方面,与其他社交媒体相比,YouTube构成的感知风险最高。此外,尽管社交媒体的使用强度对感知风险没有影响,但有关“Covid-19病例数据”的内容使人们认为Covid-19“非常危险”。关键词:大五人格;infodemic;感知风险;社交媒体的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of big-five personality and types of social media on perceived risk
Abstract. The infodemic spread during the last pandemic situation, and each individual's perceived risk varies based on the dominance of his/her personality. This study, therefore, aims to examine the effect of the Big-Five Personality and social media on the perceived risk in the vulnerable group. The number of subjects was 267 respondents from adolescence to late adulthood, with inclusion criteria: (1) active users of social media, (2) over 19 years old, and (3) approved informed consent. The research consisted of two study stages: quantitative and qualitative. The instruments used in the quantitative stage were (1) the social media questionnaire, (2) the Big-Five Inventory (BFI) scale, and (3) the perceived risk scale, while the instrument employed in the qualitative stage was an interview guideline with an open questionnaire. Then, quantitative data analysis used regression techniques, whereas qualitative ones utilized content technique analysis. As a result, the Big-Five Personality and the types of social media simultaneously and significantly affected perceived risk (p0.05). According to the qualitative method results, the information topic "Covid-19 Data Case" became a popular theme (37.83%), and the majority of respondents considered Covid-19 "very risky" (35.33%). In conclusion, neuroticism, YouTube, and WhatsApp have a role in perceived risk in vulnerable groups. On the other hand, YouTube posed the highest perceived risk compared to other social media. In addition, although the intensity of social media use did not affect perceived risk, the content about "Covid-19 Case Data" gave rise to the perception that Covid-19 was "very risky."Keywords: big-five personality; infodemic; perceived risk; types of social media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信