高等教育中以学习者为中心的反馈内容分析

Jionghao Lin, Wei Dai, Lisa-Angelique Lim, Yi-Shan Tsai, R. F. Mello, Hassan Khosravi, D. Gašević, Guanliang Chen
{"title":"高等教育中以学习者为中心的反馈内容分析","authors":"Jionghao Lin, Wei Dai, Lisa-Angelique Lim, Yi-Shan Tsai, R. F. Mello, Hassan Khosravi, D. Gašević, Guanliang Chen","doi":"10.1145/3576050.3576064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feedback is an effective way to assist students in achieving learning goals. The conceptualisation of feedback is gradually moving from feedback as information to feedback as a learner-centred process. To demonstrate feedback effectiveness, feedback as a learner-centred process should be designed to provide quality feedback content and promote student learning outcomes on the subsequent task. However, it remains unclear how instructors adopt the learner-centred feedback framework for feedback provision in the teaching practice. Thus, our study made use of a comprehensive learner-centred feedback framework to analyse feedback content and identify the characteristics of feedback content among student groups with different performance changes. Specifically, we collected the instructors’ feedback on two consecutive assignments offered by an introductory to data science course at the postgraduate level. On the basis of the first assignment, we used the status of student grade changes (i.e., students whose performance increased and those whose performance did not increase on the second assignment) as the proxy of the student learning outcomes. Then, we engineered and extracted features from the feedback content on the first assignment using a learner-centred feedback framework and further examined the differences of these features between different groups of student learning outcomes. Lastly, we used the features to predict student learning outcomes by using widely-used machine learning models and provided the interpretation of predicted results by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework. We found that 1) most features from the feedback content presented significant differences between the groups of student learning outcomes, 2) the gradient boost tree model could effectively predict student learning outcomes, and 3) SHAP could transparently interpret the feature importance on predictions.","PeriodicalId":394433,"journal":{"name":"LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learner-centred Analytics of Feedback Content in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Jionghao Lin, Wei Dai, Lisa-Angelique Lim, Yi-Shan Tsai, R. F. Mello, Hassan Khosravi, D. Gašević, Guanliang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3576050.3576064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feedback is an effective way to assist students in achieving learning goals. The conceptualisation of feedback is gradually moving from feedback as information to feedback as a learner-centred process. To demonstrate feedback effectiveness, feedback as a learner-centred process should be designed to provide quality feedback content and promote student learning outcomes on the subsequent task. However, it remains unclear how instructors adopt the learner-centred feedback framework for feedback provision in the teaching practice. Thus, our study made use of a comprehensive learner-centred feedback framework to analyse feedback content and identify the characteristics of feedback content among student groups with different performance changes. Specifically, we collected the instructors’ feedback on two consecutive assignments offered by an introductory to data science course at the postgraduate level. On the basis of the first assignment, we used the status of student grade changes (i.e., students whose performance increased and those whose performance did not increase on the second assignment) as the proxy of the student learning outcomes. Then, we engineered and extracted features from the feedback content on the first assignment using a learner-centred feedback framework and further examined the differences of these features between different groups of student learning outcomes. Lastly, we used the features to predict student learning outcomes by using widely-used machine learning models and provided the interpretation of predicted results by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework. We found that 1) most features from the feedback content presented significant differences between the groups of student learning outcomes, 2) the gradient boost tree model could effectively predict student learning outcomes, and 3) SHAP could transparently interpret the feature importance on predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3576050.3576064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3576050.3576064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

反馈是帮助学生实现学习目标的有效途径。反馈的概念正逐渐从作为信息的反馈转变为以学习者为中心的反馈过程。为了证明反馈的有效性,反馈作为一个以学习者为中心的过程,应该被设计成提供高质量的反馈内容,并促进学生在后续任务中的学习成果。然而,教师如何在教学实践中采用以学习者为中心的反馈框架来提供反馈,目前还不清楚。因此,我们的研究使用了一个全面的以学习者为中心的反馈框架来分析反馈内容,并确定不同表现变化的学生群体的反馈内容特征。具体来说,我们收集了导师对研究生阶段数据科学入门课程提供的两个连续作业的反馈。在第一次作业的基础上,我们使用学生成绩变化的状态(即,在第二次作业中,成绩提高的学生和成绩没有提高的学生)作为学生学习成果的代理。然后,我们使用以学习者为中心的反馈框架,从第一份作业的反馈内容中设计和提取特征,并进一步检查这些特征在不同学生学习成果组之间的差异。最后,通过使用广泛使用的机器学习模型,我们使用这些特征来预测学生的学习结果,并使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)框架对预测结果进行解释。我们发现,1)反馈内容中的大部分特征在学生学习成果组之间存在显著差异,2)梯度提升树模型可以有效地预测学生的学习成果,3)SHAP可以透明地解释特征对预测的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learner-centred Analytics of Feedback Content in Higher Education
Feedback is an effective way to assist students in achieving learning goals. The conceptualisation of feedback is gradually moving from feedback as information to feedback as a learner-centred process. To demonstrate feedback effectiveness, feedback as a learner-centred process should be designed to provide quality feedback content and promote student learning outcomes on the subsequent task. However, it remains unclear how instructors adopt the learner-centred feedback framework for feedback provision in the teaching practice. Thus, our study made use of a comprehensive learner-centred feedback framework to analyse feedback content and identify the characteristics of feedback content among student groups with different performance changes. Specifically, we collected the instructors’ feedback on two consecutive assignments offered by an introductory to data science course at the postgraduate level. On the basis of the first assignment, we used the status of student grade changes (i.e., students whose performance increased and those whose performance did not increase on the second assignment) as the proxy of the student learning outcomes. Then, we engineered and extracted features from the feedback content on the first assignment using a learner-centred feedback framework and further examined the differences of these features between different groups of student learning outcomes. Lastly, we used the features to predict student learning outcomes by using widely-used machine learning models and provided the interpretation of predicted results by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework. We found that 1) most features from the feedback content presented significant differences between the groups of student learning outcomes, 2) the gradient boost tree model could effectively predict student learning outcomes, and 3) SHAP could transparently interpret the feature importance on predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信