颜色标志保护研究——以显著性与功能性要求为中心

Gi-sung Choi
{"title":"颜色标志保护研究——以显著性与功能性要求为中心","authors":"Gi-sung Choi","doi":"10.38133/cnulawreview.2023.43.3.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A trademark which comprises a single color or a combination of colors has become the subject of registration in Korea since 2007. Color marks is recognized as one of the non-traditional mark. The concern that a color can be monopolized due to the effect of trademark protection and no one else use the mark results in the fact that there are still only a few examples of trademark registration of color marks. It can be said that it is important to establish the standard for protection under what conditions prescribes the protection of color marks. In particular, the question of distinctiveness, which is a basic requirement for trademark protection, it is considered that colors cannot be inherently distinctive in principle, and must be acquired secondary meaning through use. It is difficult to assume that colors are used alone, and there is a difficulty in that colors should be regarded as having independent discrimination when used together with letters and/or symbols. A consumer survey can be an effective for measuring acquired distinctiveness, but must be taken to ensure reliable results. Functionality doctrine is also important requirements for color marks protection, and not only traditional utilitarian functionality but also aesthetic functionality needs to be reviewed.","PeriodicalId":288398,"journal":{"name":"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on the Protection of Color Marks: Focused on the requirement of distinctiveness and functionality\",\"authors\":\"Gi-sung Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.38133/cnulawreview.2023.43.3.145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A trademark which comprises a single color or a combination of colors has become the subject of registration in Korea since 2007. Color marks is recognized as one of the non-traditional mark. The concern that a color can be monopolized due to the effect of trademark protection and no one else use the mark results in the fact that there are still only a few examples of trademark registration of color marks. It can be said that it is important to establish the standard for protection under what conditions prescribes the protection of color marks. In particular, the question of distinctiveness, which is a basic requirement for trademark protection, it is considered that colors cannot be inherently distinctive in principle, and must be acquired secondary meaning through use. It is difficult to assume that colors are used alone, and there is a difficulty in that colors should be regarded as having independent discrimination when used together with letters and/or symbols. A consumer survey can be an effective for measuring acquired distinctiveness, but must be taken to ensure reliable results. Functionality doctrine is also important requirements for color marks protection, and not only traditional utilitarian functionality but also aesthetic functionality needs to be reviewed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38133/cnulawreview.2023.43.3.145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38133/cnulawreview.2023.43.3.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从2007年开始,由单一颜色或多种颜色组成的商标成为了韩国的注册对象。彩色标志是公认的非传统标志之一。由于担心由于商标保护的效果,颜色可能被垄断,而没有其他人使用该商标,导致颜色商标注册的例子仍然很少。可以说,建立保护标准规定在什么条件下对颜色标志进行保护是很重要的。特别是作为商标保护基本要求的显著性问题,认为颜色原则上不能具有内在显著性,必须通过使用获得次要意义。很难假设颜色是单独使用的,而且当颜色与字母和/或符号一起使用时,颜色应该被视为具有独立的辨别能力,这是一个困难。消费者调查可以有效地衡量获得性独特性,但必须采取确保可靠的结果。功能主义也是色彩标志保护的重要要求,不仅要重新审视传统的实用功能,而且要重新审视审美功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on the Protection of Color Marks: Focused on the requirement of distinctiveness and functionality
A trademark which comprises a single color or a combination of colors has become the subject of registration in Korea since 2007. Color marks is recognized as one of the non-traditional mark. The concern that a color can be monopolized due to the effect of trademark protection and no one else use the mark results in the fact that there are still only a few examples of trademark registration of color marks. It can be said that it is important to establish the standard for protection under what conditions prescribes the protection of color marks. In particular, the question of distinctiveness, which is a basic requirement for trademark protection, it is considered that colors cannot be inherently distinctive in principle, and must be acquired secondary meaning through use. It is difficult to assume that colors are used alone, and there is a difficulty in that colors should be regarded as having independent discrimination when used together with letters and/or symbols. A consumer survey can be an effective for measuring acquired distinctiveness, but must be taken to ensure reliable results. Functionality doctrine is also important requirements for color marks protection, and not only traditional utilitarian functionality but also aesthetic functionality needs to be reviewed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信