中国近代思想:回顾与展望

Chen Lai
{"title":"中国近代思想:回顾与展望","authors":"Chen Lai","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-146724033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At one time, modern historians had come to be accustomed to using the paradigm of \"Western challenge-Chinese response\" to describe the development of modern China since the Opium War. However, in the past few decades, some scholars have begun to offer a very different opinion and argument. This is not only because Arnold J. Toynbee's \"challenge and response\" theory has continued to be repeatedly criticized and examined in a more unfavorable light, but also because people have come to believe that the lessons of Chinese history over the past century and a half cannot simply be summarized as an outward response to the modern civilization, or the civilization of modernity, represented by the West, and that the conflict between the two—[i.e., between China and the West] must be resolved only through China's own modernization. Nonetheless, from a macrocultural perspective, the question of how a premodernistic Chinese culture may produce a creative response to the modernized culture of the West has remained and...","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"3 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern Chinese Thought: A Retrospective View and a Look into the Future\",\"authors\":\"Chen Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/CSP1097-146724033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At one time, modern historians had come to be accustomed to using the paradigm of \\\"Western challenge-Chinese response\\\" to describe the development of modern China since the Opium War. However, in the past few decades, some scholars have begun to offer a very different opinion and argument. This is not only because Arnold J. Toynbee's \\\"challenge and response\\\" theory has continued to be repeatedly criticized and examined in a more unfavorable light, but also because people have come to believe that the lessons of Chinese history over the past century and a half cannot simply be summarized as an outward response to the modern civilization, or the civilization of modernity, represented by the West, and that the conflict between the two—[i.e., between China and the West] must be resolved only through China's own modernization. Nonetheless, from a macrocultural perspective, the question of how a premodernistic Chinese culture may produce a creative response to the modernized culture of the West has remained and...\",\"PeriodicalId\":162534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Studies in Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"3 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Studies in Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-146724033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-146724033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近代历史学家一度习惯于用“西方挑战—中国应对”的范式来描述鸦片战争以来近代中国的发展。然而,在过去的几十年里,一些学者开始提出一种非常不同的观点和论点。这不仅是因为汤因比(Arnold J. Toynbee)的“挑战与回应”理论不断受到更不利的批评和审视,还因为人们开始相信,过去一个半世纪的中国历史教训不能简单地概括为对以西方为代表的现代文明或现代性文明的一种外在回应,而两者之间的冲突——即对西方文明的一种外在回应。只有通过中国自身的现代化才能解决中国与西方之间的矛盾。然而,从宏观文化的角度来看,一个前现代主义的中国文化如何对西方的现代化文化产生创造性的反应的问题仍然存在,并且……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern Chinese Thought: A Retrospective View and a Look into the Future
At one time, modern historians had come to be accustomed to using the paradigm of "Western challenge-Chinese response" to describe the development of modern China since the Opium War. However, in the past few decades, some scholars have begun to offer a very different opinion and argument. This is not only because Arnold J. Toynbee's "challenge and response" theory has continued to be repeatedly criticized and examined in a more unfavorable light, but also because people have come to believe that the lessons of Chinese history over the past century and a half cannot simply be summarized as an outward response to the modern civilization, or the civilization of modernity, represented by the West, and that the conflict between the two—[i.e., between China and the West] must be resolved only through China's own modernization. Nonetheless, from a macrocultural perspective, the question of how a premodernistic Chinese culture may produce a creative response to the modernized culture of the West has remained and...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信