揭开性别多样性政策驱动变革(或不驱动变革)的政治面纱

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Heidi Rosser, Irene Ryan, Barbara Myers
{"title":"揭开性别多样性政策驱动变革(或不驱动变革)的政治面纱","authors":"Heidi Rosser,&nbsp;Irene Ryan,&nbsp;Barbara Myers","doi":"10.1111/gwao.13060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article places a critical lens over one part of an empirical study to explore the political reasons for why (or why not) women on boards policies are effective (or not) in Aotearoa New Zealand. Political intersectionality is used as a heuristic tool to link the political agendas of macro level public policies to meso-level organizational processes and how these (re)shape the micro-level everyday politics of structural privilege and disadvantage. Interview data from 10 influential male directors show how the political agendas of powerful interest groups can shape the dialog and further embed the status quo by promoting a business case for gender diversity based on the inherent assumption that it incentivizes businesses to function as meritocracies. We argue that power and conflicting political interests must be addressed if diversity-related interventions are to achieve the desired gender equity and social justice outcomes in a board membership.</p>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.13060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unmasking the politics of policy-driven change (or not) for gender diversity\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Rosser,&nbsp;Irene Ryan,&nbsp;Barbara Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwao.13060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article places a critical lens over one part of an empirical study to explore the political reasons for why (or why not) women on boards policies are effective (or not) in Aotearoa New Zealand. Political intersectionality is used as a heuristic tool to link the political agendas of macro level public policies to meso-level organizational processes and how these (re)shape the micro-level everyday politics of structural privilege and disadvantage. Interview data from 10 influential male directors show how the political agendas of powerful interest groups can shape the dialog and further embed the status quo by promoting a business case for gender diversity based on the inherent assumption that it incentivizes businesses to function as meritocracies. We argue that power and conflicting political interests must be addressed if diversity-related interventions are to achieve the desired gender equity and social justice outcomes in a board membership.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender Work and Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.13060\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender Work and Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.13060\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.13060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将批判性视角置于一项实证研究的一个部分,以探讨新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区女性进入董事会政策有效(或无效)的政治原因。文章将政治交叉性作为一种启发式工具,将宏观层面的公共政策政治议程与中观层面的组织过程联系起来,并探讨这些过程如何(重新)塑造结构性特权和劣势的微观层面的日常政治。来自 10 位有影响力的男性董事的访谈数据表明,强大利益集团的政治议程如何塑造对话,并通过促进性别多元化的商业案例来进一步巩固现状,而这些商业案例的固有假设是,性别多元化能激励企业作为任人唯贤的政体发挥作用。我们认为,如果要在董事会成员中实现预期的性别平等和社会公正,就必须解决权力和政治利益冲突问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unmasking the politics of policy-driven change (or not) for gender diversity

This article places a critical lens over one part of an empirical study to explore the political reasons for why (or why not) women on boards policies are effective (or not) in Aotearoa New Zealand. Political intersectionality is used as a heuristic tool to link the political agendas of macro level public policies to meso-level organizational processes and how these (re)shape the micro-level everyday politics of structural privilege and disadvantage. Interview data from 10 influential male directors show how the political agendas of powerful interest groups can shape the dialog and further embed the status quo by promoting a business case for gender diversity based on the inherent assumption that it incentivizes businesses to function as meritocracies. We argue that power and conflicting political interests must be addressed if diversity-related interventions are to achieve the desired gender equity and social justice outcomes in a board membership.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信