医师对基础医学教育持续性和有效性的看法

Fatih Taş, S. Güneş, Gunes Bolatli, Mehmet Üyüklü
{"title":"医师对基础医学教育持续性和有效性的看法","authors":"Fatih Taş, S. Güneş, Gunes Bolatli, Mehmet Üyüklü","doi":"10.46648/gnj.282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In this study, it is aimed to contribute to the persistence of the basic medical sciences education given in medical faculties, how much it can be integrated into clinical science practices and to the development of education. Materials and Methods: The study was planned in a descriptive type and a questionnaire was applied to collect the data. The population of the study consisted of medical faculty graduates and there was no limitation in the selection of the sample. The level of agreement with the statements was graded from 1 to 5 with Likert-type scaling. In the study with a total of 205 participants, numbers and percentages were used for the data. Results: Of the physicians 59.5% stated that the basic medical sciences courses they took were not sufficient and permanent for their professional life, 69.74% of them stated that the course topics in basic medical sciences education are too detailed, 60.48% of them stated they could not integrate the education they received in basic medical sciences into clinical sciences, 82.91% stated that it would be more beneficial to give basic medicine and clinical medical sciences courses simultaneously, and 86.82% of them stated that the technology-adapted auxiliary course tools will increase the quality of basic medical education. Conclusion: In today's world where important developments are experienced in medical education, innovations are needed in order to train physicians in the best way. For this, it is necessary to work on a system in which basic medicine and clinical medical sciences are integrated, the course curriculum is revised and a strong technological infrastructure is provided.","PeriodicalId":394509,"journal":{"name":"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Views of Physicians on the Persistence and Efficiency of Basic Medical Sciences Education\",\"authors\":\"Fatih Taş, S. Güneş, Gunes Bolatli, Mehmet Üyüklü\",\"doi\":\"10.46648/gnj.282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In this study, it is aimed to contribute to the persistence of the basic medical sciences education given in medical faculties, how much it can be integrated into clinical science practices and to the development of education. Materials and Methods: The study was planned in a descriptive type and a questionnaire was applied to collect the data. The population of the study consisted of medical faculty graduates and there was no limitation in the selection of the sample. The level of agreement with the statements was graded from 1 to 5 with Likert-type scaling. In the study with a total of 205 participants, numbers and percentages were used for the data. Results: Of the physicians 59.5% stated that the basic medical sciences courses they took were not sufficient and permanent for their professional life, 69.74% of them stated that the course topics in basic medical sciences education are too detailed, 60.48% of them stated they could not integrate the education they received in basic medical sciences into clinical sciences, 82.91% stated that it would be more beneficial to give basic medicine and clinical medical sciences courses simultaneously, and 86.82% of them stated that the technology-adapted auxiliary course tools will increase the quality of basic medical education. Conclusion: In today's world where important developments are experienced in medical education, innovations are needed in order to train physicians in the best way. For this, it is necessary to work on a system in which basic medicine and clinical medical sciences are integrated, the course curriculum is revised and a strong technological infrastructure is provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46648/gnj.282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46648/gnj.282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

前言:本研究旨在探讨医学院校基础医学教育的持续性、与临床科学实践的结合程度以及教育的发展。材料与方法:本研究采用描述性研究,采用问卷调查法收集数据。本研究的人群由医学院毕业生组成,在样本的选择上没有限制。与陈述的一致程度用李克特量表从1到5分进行评分。在共有205名参与者的研究中,数据使用了数字和百分比。结果:59.5%的医生认为基础医学课程对其职业生涯的影响不够充分和持久,69.74%的医生认为基础医学教育的课程主题过于详细,60.48%的医生认为无法将基础医学教育与临床医学相结合,82.91%的医生认为基础医学和临床医学课程同时进行更有益。86.82%的学生认为与技术相适应的辅助课程工具能提高基础医学教育的质量。结论:在当今世界,医学教育经历了重要的发展,为了以最好的方式培养医生,需要创新。为此,有必要建立一个系统,将基础医学和临床医学结合起来,修订课程课程,并提供强大的技术基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Views of Physicians on the Persistence and Efficiency of Basic Medical Sciences Education
Introduction: In this study, it is aimed to contribute to the persistence of the basic medical sciences education given in medical faculties, how much it can be integrated into clinical science practices and to the development of education. Materials and Methods: The study was planned in a descriptive type and a questionnaire was applied to collect the data. The population of the study consisted of medical faculty graduates and there was no limitation in the selection of the sample. The level of agreement with the statements was graded from 1 to 5 with Likert-type scaling. In the study with a total of 205 participants, numbers and percentages were used for the data. Results: Of the physicians 59.5% stated that the basic medical sciences courses they took were not sufficient and permanent for their professional life, 69.74% of them stated that the course topics in basic medical sciences education are too detailed, 60.48% of them stated they could not integrate the education they received in basic medical sciences into clinical sciences, 82.91% stated that it would be more beneficial to give basic medicine and clinical medical sciences courses simultaneously, and 86.82% of them stated that the technology-adapted auxiliary course tools will increase the quality of basic medical education. Conclusion: In today's world where important developments are experienced in medical education, innovations are needed in order to train physicians in the best way. For this, it is necessary to work on a system in which basic medicine and clinical medical sciences are integrated, the course curriculum is revised and a strong technological infrastructure is provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信