对解决冲突的目标进行推理

N. Griffeth, H. Velthuijsen
{"title":"对解决冲突的目标进行推理","authors":"N. Griffeth, H. Velthuijsen","doi":"10.1109/ICICIS.1993.291747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A mechanism is presented for negotiating to resolve conflicts that arise when autonomous agents need to agree on a collection of operations in order to achieve a goal. These conflicts arise when the agents have different policies as to which operations are acceptable. The authors' mechanism protects the privacy of the agents because they are not required to exchange information freely about their goals. Instead, each agent can infer the goals of the other agents. This characteristic is obtained by incorporating plan recognition in the negotiation process. Their mechanism requires agents to find alternative activities that achieve the goals of all involved agents, rather than allowing them to rely on modification of their own or other agents' goals. This approach is reasonable in contexts such as telecommunications systems, where agreement about end goals is usual, and the difficulty is in achieving agreement on the means to achieve the end goals. The negotiation mechanism is illustrated using an example where agents represent subscribers to a telecommunications system.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":270352,"journal":{"name":"[1993] Proceedings International Conference on Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reasoning about goals to resolve conflicts\",\"authors\":\"N. Griffeth, H. Velthuijsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICICIS.1993.291747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A mechanism is presented for negotiating to resolve conflicts that arise when autonomous agents need to agree on a collection of operations in order to achieve a goal. These conflicts arise when the agents have different policies as to which operations are acceptable. The authors' mechanism protects the privacy of the agents because they are not required to exchange information freely about their goals. Instead, each agent can infer the goals of the other agents. This characteristic is obtained by incorporating plan recognition in the negotiation process. Their mechanism requires agents to find alternative activities that achieve the goals of all involved agents, rather than allowing them to rely on modification of their own or other agents' goals. This approach is reasonable in contexts such as telecommunications systems, where agreement about end goals is usual, and the difficulty is in achieving agreement on the means to achieve the end goals. The negotiation mechanism is illustrated using an example where agents represent subscribers to a telecommunications system.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":270352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1993] Proceedings International Conference on Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1993] Proceedings International Conference on Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICIS.1993.291747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1993] Proceedings International Conference on Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICIS.1993.291747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

提出了一种协商机制,以解决自治代理需要就一组操作达成一致以实现目标时产生的冲突。当代理对哪些操作是可接受的有不同的策略时,就会出现这些冲突。作者的机制保护了代理的隐私,因为它们不需要自由地交换有关其目标的信息。相反,每个代理可以推断其他代理的目标。这一特点是通过在协商过程中加入计划识别而获得的。他们的机制要求代理寻找替代活动来实现所有相关代理的目标,而不是允许他们依赖于修改自己或其他代理的目标。这种方法在诸如电信系统之类的环境中是合理的,在这些环境中,通常对最终目标达成一致,而困难在于就实现最终目标的手段达成一致。通过一个例子来说明协商机制,其中代理代表电信系统的用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reasoning about goals to resolve conflicts
A mechanism is presented for negotiating to resolve conflicts that arise when autonomous agents need to agree on a collection of operations in order to achieve a goal. These conflicts arise when the agents have different policies as to which operations are acceptable. The authors' mechanism protects the privacy of the agents because they are not required to exchange information freely about their goals. Instead, each agent can infer the goals of the other agents. This characteristic is obtained by incorporating plan recognition in the negotiation process. Their mechanism requires agents to find alternative activities that achieve the goals of all involved agents, rather than allowing them to rely on modification of their own or other agents' goals. This approach is reasonable in contexts such as telecommunications systems, where agreement about end goals is usual, and the difficulty is in achieving agreement on the means to achieve the end goals. The negotiation mechanism is illustrated using an example where agents represent subscribers to a telecommunications system.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信