实践之都:当代建筑行业之旅

Yasser Megahed, A. Sharr, G. Farmer
{"title":"实践之都:当代建筑行业之旅","authors":"Yasser Megahed, A. Sharr, G. Farmer","doi":"10.24135/IJARA.V0I0.507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supervisors: Adam Sharr, Graham Farmer \nThe contemporary architectural profession is dominated by a technical-rational culture of practice. The term refers to commercially-driven practices that are often associated with the production of buildings by or for multinational corporations and tend to echo their values. This research interrogates the imperatives of this domination on the original values of the architectural profession. It builds upon two premises: firstly; mapping different cultures of practice constituting the contemporary understanding of the profession; secondly, questioning the increasing closeness between the values of the architectural profession and the instrumentalist values of other actors in the building industry. To do so, the research introduces the imaginary city of Practiceopolis as a methodological device that allows the modelling of contemporary cultures of practice and dramatises their dialogues. The research ends with propositions regarding the particular values of the architectural profession and proposes a critical-instrumental mindset to explore how these values could be defined, communicated, and marketed.","PeriodicalId":403565,"journal":{"name":"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practiceopolis: Journeys through the contemporary architectural profession\",\"authors\":\"Yasser Megahed, A. Sharr, G. Farmer\",\"doi\":\"10.24135/IJARA.V0I0.507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supervisors: Adam Sharr, Graham Farmer \\nThe contemporary architectural profession is dominated by a technical-rational culture of practice. The term refers to commercially-driven practices that are often associated with the production of buildings by or for multinational corporations and tend to echo their values. This research interrogates the imperatives of this domination on the original values of the architectural profession. It builds upon two premises: firstly; mapping different cultures of practice constituting the contemporary understanding of the profession; secondly, questioning the increasing closeness between the values of the architectural profession and the instrumentalist values of other actors in the building industry. To do so, the research introduces the imaginary city of Practiceopolis as a methodological device that allows the modelling of contemporary cultures of practice and dramatises their dialogues. The research ends with propositions regarding the particular values of the architectural profession and proposes a critical-instrumental mindset to explore how these values could be defined, communicated, and marketed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24135/IJARA.V0I0.507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/IJARA.V0I0.507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代建筑行业被一种技术-理性的实践文化所主导。这个术语指的是商业驱动的实践,通常与跨国公司或跨国公司的建筑生产有关,并倾向于呼应他们的价值观。这项研究质疑了这种对建筑行业原始价值的支配的必要性。它建立在两个前提之上:第一;绘制不同的实践文化,构成对专业的当代理解;其次,质疑建筑专业的价值观与建筑行业中其他参与者的工具主义价值观之间日益密切的关系。为了做到这一点,该研究引入了想象中的实践之城,作为一种方法论手段,允许对当代实践文化进行建模,并戏剧化他们的对话。研究以关于建筑专业的特定价值的命题结束,并提出了一种批判性工具思维,以探索如何定义、传达和营销这些价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practiceopolis: Journeys through the contemporary architectural profession
Supervisors: Adam Sharr, Graham Farmer The contemporary architectural profession is dominated by a technical-rational culture of practice. The term refers to commercially-driven practices that are often associated with the production of buildings by or for multinational corporations and tend to echo their values. This research interrogates the imperatives of this domination on the original values of the architectural profession. It builds upon two premises: firstly; mapping different cultures of practice constituting the contemporary understanding of the profession; secondly, questioning the increasing closeness between the values of the architectural profession and the instrumentalist values of other actors in the building industry. To do so, the research introduces the imaginary city of Practiceopolis as a methodological device that allows the modelling of contemporary cultures of practice and dramatises their dialogues. The research ends with propositions regarding the particular values of the architectural profession and proposes a critical-instrumental mindset to explore how these values could be defined, communicated, and marketed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信