Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts最新文献

Drawing to Conclusions: Sketching the Modulated Subject of Le Corbusier 得出结论：勾勒勒-柯布西耶的调制主题

Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.24135/ijara.v4i4.734

Mark Campbell

引用次数: 0

Drawing Ground 画地

Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.24135/ijara.v22i22.717

Ellen T. Jones, S. Twose

{"title":"Drawing Ground","authors":"Ellen T. Jones, S. Twose","doi":"10.24135/ijara.v22i22.717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24135/ijara.v22i22.717","url":null,"abstract":"Aotearoa now recognises non-human natural entities as having personhood: Te Urewera, Whanganui Awa, Taranaki Maunga. Given the significance of this recognition, the motivation for this work is to understand the evolving relationships of humans to the living, breathing ground. To do this I engaged drawing as a thinking tool, and myself as drawer/researcher, acknowledging my lens as a Pākehā (or non-Māori). This research project reflects on this work, exploring relations to Ground in Aotearoa. \u0000 \u0000“Drawing Ground” is a design-research project conducted through abstract drawing investigations, exploring connections between Ground, as a person, and my body. The work culminates in the re-sketching of the historic Dominion Museum. The building’s solidity is dissolved and reimagined through intense, turbulent sketches, engaging with Ground beneath the building. Architectural sketch drawing was used as a tool for thinking, allowing ideas to emerge yet remain open-ended and contingent, in concert with the subject matter of the research. Sketching allowed me to explore my relationship to Ground through an active and open dialogue. \u0000Throughout this process there was an imagined co-production, between me and Ground, through multiple drawing experiments. These highlight ways in which drawing-based design research can shift settler colonial perspectives on how we interact with Ground, how architecture might achieve reciprocity with Ground as co-drawer and delineator of space.","PeriodicalId":403565,"journal":{"name":"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116173088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Spectral urbanism 光谱都市生活

Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.24135/ijara.v22i22.716

T. Collins, Andrew Douglas

引用次数: 0

Diagrams in the field: Three conceptual approaches in the entries for the 1979 Australian Parliament House design competition 现场图表:1979年澳大利亚国会大厦设计竞赛参赛作品中的三种概念方法

Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.24135/ijara.v22i22.713

L. Tipene

{"title":"Diagrams in the field: Three conceptual approaches in the entries for the 1979 Australian Parliament House design competition","authors":"L. Tipene","doi":"10.24135/ijara.v22i22.713","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24135/ijara.v22i22.713","url":null,"abstract":"Compositional relationships are well established between Walter Burley Griffin and Marion Mahony Griffin’s 1912 urban plan for Canberra and the winning design by Mitchell, Giurgola and Thorp for Australia’s New Parliament House. As recognised by Andrew Hutson in 2011 and 2013, the civic-scale geometric planning features of the parliamentary triangle and land axis—from the Griffin Plan—influenced the competition brief, submitted entries, and assessors’ deliberations for the 1979 Australian Parliament House design competition. Yet, on reviewing the remaining submissions for 324 of the competition entries in the National Archives of Australia, many schemes appear to reject an apparent alignment with the geometric symbolism of the Griffin Plan. \u0000This article surveys the lesser-known majority of competition submissions to consider other approaches to the relationship between Canberra’s urban plan and proposed parliamentary architecture, beyond the historical significance of the Griffin Plan. By comparing James Weirick’s 1989 criticism of Parliament’s remote location to Colin Rowe and Fred Koetter’s 1978 criticism of urban voids, it identifies three conceptual approaches to the problems of the site’s isolation—apparent in common characteristics across many entrants’ unique schemes. These three approaches include rejecting references to Canberra’s urban exterior with autonomous parliamentary architectural forms; internalising Canberra’s urban plan within parliamentary designs replete with symbolic gestures; or reclassifying parliamentary architecture as urban interiors for gathering places of public representation. Each approach reflects interpretations of Australia’s parliamentary democracy in different ways, and reveals risks and potential benefits for democratic practices when architecture and urban planning is employed to speak for the rights of others.","PeriodicalId":403565,"journal":{"name":"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115307161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Routledge Handbook of Architecture, Urban Space and Politics, Volume 1: Violence, Spectacle and Data,ed. Nikolina Bobic and Farzaneh Haghighi 劳特利奇建筑，城市空间和政治手册，卷1:暴力，景观和数据，编辑。Nikolina Bobic和Farzaneh Haghighi

Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.24135/ijara.v22i22.718

Samer Wanan

引用次数: 1

Watershed or whimper? The Australian Year of the Built Environment, 2004 分水岭还是呜咽?2004年澳大利亚建筑环境年

Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.24135/ijara.v22i22.714

S. Holden, Olivia Daw

{"title":"Watershed or whimper? The Australian Year of the Built Environment, 2004","authors":"S. Holden, Olivia Daw","doi":"10.24135/ijara.v22i22.714","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24135/ijara.v22i22.714","url":null,"abstract":"The 2004 Year of the Built Environment (YBE) was an initiative of the Australian Government that aimed to raise awareness and propel positive change in built environment design for the benefit of the whole community. Adopted after successful lobbying by the Royal Australian Institute of Architects, it provided an opportunity for architectural leadership and engagement with built environment governance at a time when the sustainability agenda was gaining popular momentum. An array of national- and state-level initiatives championed a range of themes from construction innovation to architectural heritage and the future of housing, with a focus on highlighting exemplars and supporting built demonstration projects. Patron-in-chief Governor-General Major General Michael Jeffery described it as a “watershed year” that had the potential to influence the quality of the built environment for years to come. In contrast, the Urban Design Forum described the initiative as “a whimper” disguising a lack of ongoing budget commitment and disinterest from national leadership on built environment issues across the political spectrum. In the ongoing absence of a national built environment policy agenda in Australia, and as a coordinated approach to climate adaptation in built environment design has become more than urgent, what was the legacy of this somewhat forgotten Year of the Built Environment? This article explores this question, analysing how the year exposed the need for new forms of engagement with government that aligned with changing modes of public administration. It reflects on how the year was a catalyst for the establishment of new State Government Architect positions and influenced how the architecture profession’s involvement in built environment governance has developed since.","PeriodicalId":403565,"journal":{"name":"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127435520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Colophon

Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.24135/ijara.v22i22.722

Issue Editor

引用次数: 0

Urban Historical 城市的历史

Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.24135/ijara.v22i22.710

J. Gatley, Elizabeth Aitken Rose

引用次数: 0

Securing Urbanism: Contagion, Power and Risk, Mark Laurence Jackson and Mark Hanlen 《保障都市主义:传染、权力与风险》，马克·劳伦斯·杰克逊、马克·汉伦著

Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.24135/ijara.v22i22.719

Andrew Douglas

引用次数: 0

The “soft edge”: Heritage, special character, and new planning directives in Aotearoa cities “软边缘”:奥特罗亚城市的遗产、特色和新规划指令

Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.24135/ijara.v22i22.715

Carolyn Hill

{"title":"The “soft edge”: Heritage, special character, and new planning directives in Aotearoa cities","authors":"Carolyn Hill","doi":"10.24135/ijara.v22i22.715","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24135/ijara.v22i22.715","url":null,"abstract":"Divergent visions for urban form are currently contesting the future of cities in Aotearoa. Severe pressures of population growth, inadequate housing supply, and unsustainable transport systems are raising a spectrum of voices on the appropriate planning response. The heritage field is enfolded in these debates, as intensification pressures have amplified questions about the value of historic urban fabric and the planning mechanisms that sustain it. To what extent should cities’ existing areas be retained or developed, and who gets to decide? \u0000Focusing on the “soft edge” of heritage—early suburbs valorised as “special character”—the paper traces the history of heritage-making in urban Aotearoa and its role in maintaining the ontological security of the settler state. It first explores the processes of identifying and managing historic urban forms that have gradually evolved through Aotearoa’s planning legislation, from the early town planning acts to the Resource Management Act 1991. It then analyses the tension between contemporary urban planning directions and historic places conservation, exploring the concept of “amenity,” which is implicated in both. It concludes with some avenues for deeper collaboration between planning policy and heritage-making for more spatially and culturally equitable cities.","PeriodicalId":403565,"journal":{"name":"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114407372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0