因Covid-19大流行而关闭肉毒杆菌毒素咨询对痉挛治疗的影响:文献综述

Eduardo Freitas Ferreira
{"title":"因Covid-19大流行而关闭肉毒杆菌毒素咨询对痉挛治疗的影响:文献综述","authors":"Eduardo Freitas Ferreira","doi":"10.23880/act-16000212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed an additional pressure on health systems worldwide, creating an increased challenge to chronic patient management due to consultation shutdown. Spastic patients were especially vulnerable to inadequate care. This review aims to describe the impact of botulinum toxin (BT) consultation interruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic on spasticity treatment. Methods: A literature search was conducted in the database of Medline, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Scopus. Keywords for the search included “COVID-19” AND “Botulinum Toxin” AND “Spasticity”. Results: A total of 6 studies reporting the impact of BT consultation suspension on spasticity due to the COVID-19 pandemic met inclusion criteria. All studies were observational and included a small sample. Consultation interruption was variable between studies and ranged from 36-75 days, originating a mean treatment delay of 23-129 days due to re-scheduling difficulties. The majority (72-93%) of patients in all studies perceived worsening of spasticity with BT consultation suspension. Effects seem to be worse with longer treatment delays and concerning the mobility and passive function treatment objectives. Some studies reported a worse quality of life in patients with BT treatment delay whilst others did not find this association. Discussion: Although a year has passed since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a scarcity of studies reporting the impact of BT consultation interruption on the treatment of spastic patients. An increased inter-treatment delay originates a reduction in the effectiveness at the end of the treatment cycle due BT washout. On average, a 1% worsening of symptoms occurs with one day of delay. Thus, a small delay of a few weeks can lead to worsening of symptoms which may take several treatment cycles to return to previous stable benefit level. The impact of BT consultation suspension on quality of life is controversial and further studies are necessary to clarify this question. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major negative impact on the BT treatment of spasticity. Thus, consultation shutdown severely affected these patients and needs to be avoided.","PeriodicalId":134434,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical Toxicology","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Botulinum Toxin Consultation Shutdown Due to the Covid-19 Pandemic on Spasticity Treatment: A Review of the Literature\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Freitas Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/act-16000212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed an additional pressure on health systems worldwide, creating an increased challenge to chronic patient management due to consultation shutdown. Spastic patients were especially vulnerable to inadequate care. This review aims to describe the impact of botulinum toxin (BT) consultation interruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic on spasticity treatment. Methods: A literature search was conducted in the database of Medline, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Scopus. Keywords for the search included “COVID-19” AND “Botulinum Toxin” AND “Spasticity”. Results: A total of 6 studies reporting the impact of BT consultation suspension on spasticity due to the COVID-19 pandemic met inclusion criteria. All studies were observational and included a small sample. Consultation interruption was variable between studies and ranged from 36-75 days, originating a mean treatment delay of 23-129 days due to re-scheduling difficulties. The majority (72-93%) of patients in all studies perceived worsening of spasticity with BT consultation suspension. Effects seem to be worse with longer treatment delays and concerning the mobility and passive function treatment objectives. Some studies reported a worse quality of life in patients with BT treatment delay whilst others did not find this association. Discussion: Although a year has passed since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a scarcity of studies reporting the impact of BT consultation interruption on the treatment of spastic patients. An increased inter-treatment delay originates a reduction in the effectiveness at the end of the treatment cycle due BT washout. On average, a 1% worsening of symptoms occurs with one day of delay. Thus, a small delay of a few weeks can lead to worsening of symptoms which may take several treatment cycles to return to previous stable benefit level. The impact of BT consultation suspension on quality of life is controversial and further studies are necessary to clarify this question. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major negative impact on the BT treatment of spasticity. Thus, consultation shutdown severely affected these patients and needs to be avoided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Clinical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Clinical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/act-16000212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/act-16000212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行给世界各地的卫生系统带来了额外的压力,由于停止会诊,对慢性患者管理造成了更大的挑战。痉挛患者尤其容易受到护理不足的影响。本综述旨在描述因COVID-19大流行导致的肉毒杆菌毒素(BT)咨询中断对痉挛治疗的影响。方法:在Medline、PubMed、Embase、Google Scholar、Scopus等数据库中进行文献检索。搜索关键词包括“COVID-19”、“肉毒杆菌毒素”和“痉挛”。结果:共有6篇报道因COVID-19大流行而暂停BT会诊对痉挛影响的研究符合纳入标准。所有的研究都是观察性的,包括一个小样本。咨询中断在不同的研究中是可变的,从36-75天不等,由于重新安排困难,导致平均治疗延迟23-129天。在所有研究中,大多数(72-93%)患者认为BT咨询暂停后痉挛加重。治疗延迟时间越长,影响活动能力和被动功能治疗目标的效果越差。一些研究报告了BT治疗延迟患者的生活质量较差,而其他研究没有发现这种关联。讨论:尽管自COVID-19大流行开始已有一年时间,但很少有研究报告BT咨询中断对痉挛患者治疗的影响。在治疗周期结束时,由于BT冲洗,治疗间延迟的增加导致有效性降低。平均而言,延迟一天,症状恶化1%。因此,几周的小延迟可能导致症状恶化,这可能需要几个治疗周期才能恢复到以前稳定的受益水平。BT咨询暂停对生活质量的影响是有争议的,需要进一步的研究来澄清这个问题。结论:2019冠状病毒病大流行对痉挛的BT治疗产生了重大负面影响。因此,关闭会诊严重影响了这些患者,需要避免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Botulinum Toxin Consultation Shutdown Due to the Covid-19 Pandemic on Spasticity Treatment: A Review of the Literature
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed an additional pressure on health systems worldwide, creating an increased challenge to chronic patient management due to consultation shutdown. Spastic patients were especially vulnerable to inadequate care. This review aims to describe the impact of botulinum toxin (BT) consultation interruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic on spasticity treatment. Methods: A literature search was conducted in the database of Medline, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Scopus. Keywords for the search included “COVID-19” AND “Botulinum Toxin” AND “Spasticity”. Results: A total of 6 studies reporting the impact of BT consultation suspension on spasticity due to the COVID-19 pandemic met inclusion criteria. All studies were observational and included a small sample. Consultation interruption was variable between studies and ranged from 36-75 days, originating a mean treatment delay of 23-129 days due to re-scheduling difficulties. The majority (72-93%) of patients in all studies perceived worsening of spasticity with BT consultation suspension. Effects seem to be worse with longer treatment delays and concerning the mobility and passive function treatment objectives. Some studies reported a worse quality of life in patients with BT treatment delay whilst others did not find this association. Discussion: Although a year has passed since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a scarcity of studies reporting the impact of BT consultation interruption on the treatment of spastic patients. An increased inter-treatment delay originates a reduction in the effectiveness at the end of the treatment cycle due BT washout. On average, a 1% worsening of symptoms occurs with one day of delay. Thus, a small delay of a few weeks can lead to worsening of symptoms which may take several treatment cycles to return to previous stable benefit level. The impact of BT consultation suspension on quality of life is controversial and further studies are necessary to clarify this question. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major negative impact on the BT treatment of spasticity. Thus, consultation shutdown severely affected these patients and needs to be avoided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信