{"title":"工资弹性与短期生产率之谜","authors":"Robert James","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2765072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perfect competition implies stage two production for labor, where increased employment lowers productivity and decreased employment increases productivity. In contrast, empirical studies of individual firms and macroeconomic studies of the business cycle have document pro-cyclical productivity. This paper explains this productivity puzzle. Specifically, it is shown that recent estimates of the wage elasticity of labor supply to a firm (Manning, 2003, Booth and Katic, 2010, Depew and Sorensen, 2013, and others) are consistent with stage one production for labor with pro-cyclical productivity. It is also shown that in a two resource economy, pro-cyclical productivity implies stage three production for capital and a negative marginal product of capital. It is argued that both stage one production for labor and stage three production for capital have important policy implications.","PeriodicalId":321011,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Perfect Competition (Topic)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wage Elasticity and the Short-Run Productivity Puzzle\",\"authors\":\"Robert James\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2765072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Perfect competition implies stage two production for labor, where increased employment lowers productivity and decreased employment increases productivity. In contrast, empirical studies of individual firms and macroeconomic studies of the business cycle have document pro-cyclical productivity. This paper explains this productivity puzzle. Specifically, it is shown that recent estimates of the wage elasticity of labor supply to a firm (Manning, 2003, Booth and Katic, 2010, Depew and Sorensen, 2013, and others) are consistent with stage one production for labor with pro-cyclical productivity. It is also shown that in a two resource economy, pro-cyclical productivity implies stage three production for capital and a negative marginal product of capital. It is argued that both stage one production for labor and stage three production for capital have important policy implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Perfect Competition (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Perfect Competition (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2765072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Perfect Competition (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2765072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
完全竞争意味着劳动力生产的第二阶段,在这个阶段,就业增加会降低生产率,就业减少会提高生产率。相比之下,个别企业的实证研究和商业周期的宏观经济研究都记录了顺周期生产率。本文解释了这个生产力之谜。具体而言,研究表明,最近对企业劳动力供给的工资弹性的估计(Manning, 2003; Booth and Katic, 2010; Depew and Sorensen, 2013等)与具有顺周期生产率的劳动力的第一阶段生产相一致。研究还表明,在双资源经济中,顺周期生产率意味着第三阶段的资本生产和负的资本边际产量。本文认为,第一阶段为劳动力生产和第三阶段为资本生产都具有重要的政策意义。
Wage Elasticity and the Short-Run Productivity Puzzle
Perfect competition implies stage two production for labor, where increased employment lowers productivity and decreased employment increases productivity. In contrast, empirical studies of individual firms and macroeconomic studies of the business cycle have document pro-cyclical productivity. This paper explains this productivity puzzle. Specifically, it is shown that recent estimates of the wage elasticity of labor supply to a firm (Manning, 2003, Booth and Katic, 2010, Depew and Sorensen, 2013, and others) are consistent with stage one production for labor with pro-cyclical productivity. It is also shown that in a two resource economy, pro-cyclical productivity implies stage three production for capital and a negative marginal product of capital. It is argued that both stage one production for labor and stage three production for capital have important policy implications.