递减效应:选择性消费税的原因与后果

A. Hoffer, Rejeana M. Gvillo, W. Shughart, Michael D. Thomas
{"title":"递减效应:选择性消费税的原因与后果","authors":"A. Hoffer, Rejeana M. Gvillo, W. Shughart, Michael D. Thomas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3211628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study provides a systematic analysis of selective consumption tax policy. We detail both the motivations behind selective consumption taxes and the policy's shortcomings. Empirically, we explore how consumption of 12 goods?alcohol, cigarettes, fast food, items sold at vending machines, purchases of food away from home, cookies, cakes, chips, candy, donuts, bacon, and carbonated soft drinks?varies across the income distribution by calculating the goods' income-expenditure elasticities. Income has the greatest effect on expenditures for alcohol. A 1 percentagepoint increase in income (approximately $428 at the mean) translates into a 0.314 percentage point increase in spending on alcoholic beverages (approximately $1 annually at the mean). Income has the smallest influence on tobacco expenditures (0.007) and donut expenditures (?0.009). We conclude from this evidence that any tax on such goods is regressive.","PeriodicalId":375480,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Value-Added Tax; Goods & Services Tax (Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regressive Effects: Causes and Consequences of Selective Consumption Taxation\",\"authors\":\"A. Hoffer, Rejeana M. Gvillo, W. Shughart, Michael D. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3211628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study provides a systematic analysis of selective consumption tax policy. We detail both the motivations behind selective consumption taxes and the policy's shortcomings. Empirically, we explore how consumption of 12 goods?alcohol, cigarettes, fast food, items sold at vending machines, purchases of food away from home, cookies, cakes, chips, candy, donuts, bacon, and carbonated soft drinks?varies across the income distribution by calculating the goods' income-expenditure elasticities. Income has the greatest effect on expenditures for alcohol. A 1 percentagepoint increase in income (approximately $428 at the mean) translates into a 0.314 percentage point increase in spending on alcoholic beverages (approximately $1 annually at the mean). Income has the smallest influence on tobacco expenditures (0.007) and donut expenditures (?0.009). We conclude from this evidence that any tax on such goods is regressive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Value-Added Tax; Goods & Services Tax (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Value-Added Tax; Goods & Services Tax (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3211628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Value-Added Tax; Goods & Services Tax (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3211628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本研究对选择性消费税政策进行了系统分析。我们详细介绍了选择性消费税背后的动机和该政策的缺点。经验上,我们探讨了12种商品的消费是如何?酒、烟、快餐、自动售货机卖的东西、从家里买的食物、饼干、蛋糕、薯片、糖果、甜甜圈、培根和碳酸软饮料?通过计算商品的收入-支出弹性,在收入分配中有所不同。收入对酒精消费的影响最大。收入每增加1个百分点(平均约428美元),酒精饮料支出就会增加0.314个百分点(平均每年约1美元)。收入对烟草支出(0.007)和甜甜圈支出(- 0.009)的影响最小。我们从这一证据中得出结论,对这类商品征收的任何税都是累退的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regressive Effects: Causes and Consequences of Selective Consumption Taxation
This study provides a systematic analysis of selective consumption tax policy. We detail both the motivations behind selective consumption taxes and the policy's shortcomings. Empirically, we explore how consumption of 12 goods?alcohol, cigarettes, fast food, items sold at vending machines, purchases of food away from home, cookies, cakes, chips, candy, donuts, bacon, and carbonated soft drinks?varies across the income distribution by calculating the goods' income-expenditure elasticities. Income has the greatest effect on expenditures for alcohol. A 1 percentagepoint increase in income (approximately $428 at the mean) translates into a 0.314 percentage point increase in spending on alcoholic beverages (approximately $1 annually at the mean). Income has the smallest influence on tobacco expenditures (0.007) and donut expenditures (?0.009). We conclude from this evidence that any tax on such goods is regressive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信