M. Matusiak, M. Furmanek, Piotr Skarżyński, H. Skarżyńśki
{"title":"Radiologiczna ocena ślimaka i zachowanie słuchu u dzieci leczonych za pomocą wszczepienia implantu ślimakowego Cochlear Nucleus z elektrodą prostą CI422","authors":"M. Matusiak, M. Furmanek, Piotr Skarżyński, H. Skarżyńśki","doi":"10.17431/1003380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cochlear implantation is becoming more and more widely used in clinical practice. In this study we’ve verified the hypothesis that cochlear implantation according to individually calculated depth of insertion affects hearing preservation in children with preoperative substantial hearing. In the retrospective analysis of 19 children implanted with Cochlear Nucleus CI422 electrode in Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing in Warsaw between 2010–2011 the relation between cochlea size and insertion depth angle was calculated on the basis of radiological data and hearing preservation rate, calculated according to Hearing Preservation Classification. [1] Hearing Preservation rate for the whole group at activation was 73%, after 24 months – 67%. Mean value of insertion depth angle was 375° (SD = 17°); mean value of calculated length of cochlear duct was 34.67 mm (SD = 1.91); mean calculated linear insertion depth of the electrode array was 23.1 mm (SD = 1.62). We did not find any statistically significant difference between hearing preservation rate and angle of insertion and between hearing preservation rate and linear insertion depth for the analysed group in any of three intervals: activation, 12 months follow up and 24 months follow up. Preoperative measurement of cochlea size and its specific parameters, like linear insertion depth, do not influence hearing preservation after implantation. Low level of hearing preservation rate in some cases cannot be explained with intracochlear position of the array (>450°) in computed tomography.","PeriodicalId":214555,"journal":{"name":"Nowa Audiofonologia","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nowa Audiofonologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17431/1003380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人工耳蜗植入术在临床上的应用越来越广泛。在本研究中,我们验证了人工耳蜗植入术根据个人计算的植入术深度影响术前听力相当的儿童的听力保存的假设。回顾性分析2010-2011年华沙听力生理病理研究所19例植入耳蜗核CI422电极的患儿,根据影像学资料和听力保存率计算耳蜗大小与植入深度角的关系,按听力保存分类计算。[1]全组激活时听力保有率为73%,24个月后听力保有率为67%。插入深度角平均值为375°(SD = 17°);计算耳蜗管长度平均值为34.67 mm (SD = 1.91);计算电极阵列的平均线性插入深度为23.1 mm (SD = 1.62)。在激活、随访12个月和随访24个月这三个时间间隔中,分析组的听力保存率和插入角度以及听力保存率和线性插入深度之间没有统计学差异。术前测量耳蜗大小及其具体参数,如线性插入深度,不影响耳蜗植入后的听力保存。在某些病例中,低水平的听力保存率不能用计算机断层扫描中耳蜗阵列的位置(>450°)来解释。
Radiologiczna ocena ślimaka i zachowanie słuchu u dzieci leczonych za pomocą wszczepienia implantu ślimakowego Cochlear Nucleus z elektrodą prostą CI422
Cochlear implantation is becoming more and more widely used in clinical practice. In this study we’ve verified the hypothesis that cochlear implantation according to individually calculated depth of insertion affects hearing preservation in children with preoperative substantial hearing. In the retrospective analysis of 19 children implanted with Cochlear Nucleus CI422 electrode in Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing in Warsaw between 2010–2011 the relation between cochlea size and insertion depth angle was calculated on the basis of radiological data and hearing preservation rate, calculated according to Hearing Preservation Classification. [1] Hearing Preservation rate for the whole group at activation was 73%, after 24 months – 67%. Mean value of insertion depth angle was 375° (SD = 17°); mean value of calculated length of cochlear duct was 34.67 mm (SD = 1.91); mean calculated linear insertion depth of the electrode array was 23.1 mm (SD = 1.62). We did not find any statistically significant difference between hearing preservation rate and angle of insertion and between hearing preservation rate and linear insertion depth for the analysed group in any of three intervals: activation, 12 months follow up and 24 months follow up. Preoperative measurement of cochlea size and its specific parameters, like linear insertion depth, do not influence hearing preservation after implantation. Low level of hearing preservation rate in some cases cannot be explained with intracochlear position of the array (>450°) in computed tomography.