运输过程中车载系统状态和路径感知技术的评估

T. Etherington, L. Kramer, Renee C. Lake, T. Schnell, R. Mumaw, L. Sherry, Matthew B. Cover, Tom Evans
{"title":"运输过程中车载系统状态和路径感知技术的评估","authors":"T. Etherington, L. Kramer, Renee C. Lake, T. Schnell, R. Mumaw, L. Sherry, Matthew B. Cover, Tom Evans","doi":"10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even after decades of continuous use, automation surprise and mode confusion are still prevalent in commercial airline operations. Without increased awareness of the aircraft and automation future state, crews have difficulty monitoring and managing flight path leading to clearance violations and the potential for loss of separation. A pilot-in-the-loop flight simulation study was conducted at NASA Langley Research Center to evaluate a path awareness display technology concept called “Automation Does What?” and an automation configuration display technology concept called “Automation Function Configuration Display”. The two technologies were evaluated and contrasted with a current state-of-the-art flight deck modeled from the Boeing B-787 using guided discussion and pilot comments. Objective and subjective data were collected from aircraft parameters, questionnaires, audio/video recordings, head/eye tracking data, and subject matter expert observations.","PeriodicalId":112045,"journal":{"name":"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Onboard System State and Path Awareness Technologies During Transport Operations\",\"authors\":\"T. Etherington, L. Kramer, Renee C. Lake, T. Schnell, R. Mumaw, L. Sherry, Matthew B. Cover, Tom Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even after decades of continuous use, automation surprise and mode confusion are still prevalent in commercial airline operations. Without increased awareness of the aircraft and automation future state, crews have difficulty monitoring and managing flight path leading to clearance violations and the potential for loss of separation. A pilot-in-the-loop flight simulation study was conducted at NASA Langley Research Center to evaluate a path awareness display technology concept called “Automation Does What?” and an automation configuration display technology concept called “Automation Function Configuration Display”. The two technologies were evaluated and contrasted with a current state-of-the-art flight deck modeled from the Boeing B-787 using guided discussion and pilot comments. Objective and subjective data were collected from aircraft parameters, questionnaires, audio/video recordings, head/eye tracking data, and subject matter expert observations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

即使经过几十年的持续使用,自动化意外和模式混淆仍然普遍存在于商业航空公司的运营中。如果不提高对飞机和自动化未来状态的认识,机组人员就难以监控和管理飞行路径,从而导致违反许可规定和失去分离的可能性。美国宇航局兰利研究中心进行了一项飞行员在环飞行模拟研究,以评估一种名为“自动化做什么”的路径感知显示技术概念。以及一种称为“自动化功能组态显示”的自动化组态显示技术概念。通过引导性讨论和飞行员评论,对这两种技术进行了评估,并与目前最先进的波音B-787飞行甲板模型进行了对比。客观和主观数据收集自飞机参数、问卷调查、音频/视频记录、头/眼追踪数据和主题专家观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Onboard System State and Path Awareness Technologies During Transport Operations
Even after decades of continuous use, automation surprise and mode confusion are still prevalent in commercial airline operations. Without increased awareness of the aircraft and automation future state, crews have difficulty monitoring and managing flight path leading to clearance violations and the potential for loss of separation. A pilot-in-the-loop flight simulation study was conducted at NASA Langley Research Center to evaluate a path awareness display technology concept called “Automation Does What?” and an automation configuration display technology concept called “Automation Function Configuration Display”. The two technologies were evaluated and contrasted with a current state-of-the-art flight deck modeled from the Boeing B-787 using guided discussion and pilot comments. Objective and subjective data were collected from aircraft parameters, questionnaires, audio/video recordings, head/eye tracking data, and subject matter expert observations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信