{"title":"从量子点接触的交流和直流电导测量中获得的land<s:1> g因子的相对精度的数值模型","authors":"S. Fricke, A. Burke, A. Micolich","doi":"10.1109/COMMAD.2012.6472404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of approaches currently exist for obtaining the Landé effective g-factor g* from experimental measurements of the ac and dc conductance of AlGaAs/GaAs Quantum Point Contacts (QPCs). The correspondence between these methods is not perfect, motivating us to develop an analytical model for assessing the relative accuracy of the various approaches using a perfect, experimental artefact-free data-set. We will present a comparative study of the accuracy of ac and dc-based methods for determining the g-factor in QPCs.","PeriodicalId":136573,"journal":{"name":"COMMAD 2012","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A numerical model for determining the relative accuracy of the Landé g-factor obtained from ac and dc conductance measurements of Quantum Point Contacts\",\"authors\":\"S. Fricke, A. Burke, A. Micolich\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMMAD.2012.6472404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A number of approaches currently exist for obtaining the Landé effective g-factor g* from experimental measurements of the ac and dc conductance of AlGaAs/GaAs Quantum Point Contacts (QPCs). The correspondence between these methods is not perfect, motivating us to develop an analytical model for assessing the relative accuracy of the various approaches using a perfect, experimental artefact-free data-set. We will present a comparative study of the accuracy of ac and dc-based methods for determining the g-factor in QPCs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMMAD 2012\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMMAD 2012\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMMAD.2012.6472404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMAD 2012","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMMAD.2012.6472404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A numerical model for determining the relative accuracy of the Landé g-factor obtained from ac and dc conductance measurements of Quantum Point Contacts
A number of approaches currently exist for obtaining the Landé effective g-factor g* from experimental measurements of the ac and dc conductance of AlGaAs/GaAs Quantum Point Contacts (QPCs). The correspondence between these methods is not perfect, motivating us to develop an analytical model for assessing the relative accuracy of the various approaches using a perfect, experimental artefact-free data-set. We will present a comparative study of the accuracy of ac and dc-based methods for determining the g-factor in QPCs.