{"title":"“菲尼格拉行星”的文学来源","authors":"F. Saxl","doi":"10.2307/750031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Saints in whose honour the portable altar was dedicated and whose names appear on the back. 'Bernardus' is by no means a misspelling for 'Bernwardus'; in fact, the portrait represents Bishop Bernard I ( 1301153), who founded the Benedictine abbey of St. Godehard and here enjoyed veneration as a Saint. It remains to explain the dedicatory inscription of \"Thidericus abbas tertius.\" The difficulty which puzzled Labarte and Goldschmidt is easily overcome by interpreting it, not as \"Thierry the Third, Abbot of...,\" but as \"Thierry, third Abbot of....\" As a matter of fact, the Abbots of St. Godehard's, Hildesheim, used to number themselves according to their respective place in the succession of abbots from the foundation of the abbey onward. Thus the first three abbots were called 'Fridericus abbas primus' (ca. I 40o-ca. I 55), 'Arnoldus abbas secundus' (ca. 1155-1181), and 'Thidericus abbas tertius' (I18I-1204) respectively. This date and place of the portable altar fit in with the detailed description given by Georg Swarzenski of the artistic activities in Saxony during the second half of the I2th century.' Swarzenski had already a reason for mentioning the Abbey of St. Godehard as a place where works of art were appreciated : Frederick, its first abbot, commissioned a precious book cover at the studio where goldsmiths, scribes and other artists worked for Henry the Lion (1142I 195), the Bishops of Hildesheim, and other lords spiritual and temporal.2 This portable altar, too, we may conclude, originated with the same monks of Helmarshausen, or, to make allowance for the objections raised by one or two of Swarzenski's critics, of Hildesheim or Brunswick. These artists combined the old craftsmanship of Saxony, which had flourished ever since the time of Bishop Bernward (996-IO22), with the fresh suggestions imported from Byzantium after the crusade of Duke Henry, in I I72,3 and from Winchester after Henry's marriage with Princess Matilda, daughter of King Henry II of England, in Ix68. To return once more to the recent history of the altar, we may even suggest an explanation of how it came into private ownership. Count Renesse-Breidbach, its first owner at the beginning of the I9th century, was a Privy Councillor of the Archbishop of Treves.4 It was to Treves Cathedral that","PeriodicalId":410128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Warburg Institute","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1938-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Literary Sources of the 'Finiguerra Planets'\",\"authors\":\"F. Saxl\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/750031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Saints in whose honour the portable altar was dedicated and whose names appear on the back. 'Bernardus' is by no means a misspelling for 'Bernwardus'; in fact, the portrait represents Bishop Bernard I ( 1301153), who founded the Benedictine abbey of St. Godehard and here enjoyed veneration as a Saint. It remains to explain the dedicatory inscription of \\\"Thidericus abbas tertius.\\\" The difficulty which puzzled Labarte and Goldschmidt is easily overcome by interpreting it, not as \\\"Thierry the Third, Abbot of...,\\\" but as \\\"Thierry, third Abbot of....\\\" As a matter of fact, the Abbots of St. Godehard's, Hildesheim, used to number themselves according to their respective place in the succession of abbots from the foundation of the abbey onward. Thus the first three abbots were called 'Fridericus abbas primus' (ca. I 40o-ca. I 55), 'Arnoldus abbas secundus' (ca. 1155-1181), and 'Thidericus abbas tertius' (I18I-1204) respectively. This date and place of the portable altar fit in with the detailed description given by Georg Swarzenski of the artistic activities in Saxony during the second half of the I2th century.' Swarzenski had already a reason for mentioning the Abbey of St. Godehard as a place where works of art were appreciated : Frederick, its first abbot, commissioned a precious book cover at the studio where goldsmiths, scribes and other artists worked for Henry the Lion (1142I 195), the Bishops of Hildesheim, and other lords spiritual and temporal.2 This portable altar, too, we may conclude, originated with the same monks of Helmarshausen, or, to make allowance for the objections raised by one or two of Swarzenski's critics, of Hildesheim or Brunswick. These artists combined the old craftsmanship of Saxony, which had flourished ever since the time of Bishop Bernward (996-IO22), with the fresh suggestions imported from Byzantium after the crusade of Duke Henry, in I I72,3 and from Winchester after Henry's marriage with Princess Matilda, daughter of King Henry II of England, in Ix68. To return once more to the recent history of the altar, we may even suggest an explanation of how it came into private ownership. Count Renesse-Breidbach, its first owner at the beginning of the I9th century, was a Privy Councillor of the Archbishop of Treves.4 It was to Treves Cathedral that\",\"PeriodicalId\":410128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Warburg Institute\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1938-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Warburg Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/750031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Warburg Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/750031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
便携式祭坛是为纪念他们而建的,他们的名字出现在祭坛的背面。'Bernardus'绝不是'Bernwardus'的拼写错误;事实上,这幅画像描绘的是贝尔纳一世主教(1301153),他创立了圣戈德哈德本笃会修道院,并在这里被尊为圣人。它仍然可以解释“Thidericus abbas tertius”的题词。困扰拉巴特和戈德施密特的困难很容易克服,只要把它解释为“蒂埃里三世,修道院院长……”而是“蒂埃里,....的第三任修道院院长”。事实上,圣哥德哈德的修道院院长,希尔德斯海姆,用来编号自己根据各自的地方,在继承修道院的基础上,院长。因此,最初的三位方丈被称为“Fridericus abbas primus”(约公元400年至公元60年)。i55),“Arnoldus abbas secundus”(约1155-1181)和“Thidericus abbas tertius”(I18I-1204)。便携式祭坛的日期和地点与乔治·斯瓦真斯基对萨克森州12世纪下半叶艺术活动的详细描述相吻合。”施华真斯基提到圣哥德哈德修道院是一个欣赏艺术作品的地方是有原因的:弗雷德里克,它的第一任修道院院长,委托在金匠,抄写员和其他艺术家为狮子亨利(1142I - 195),希尔德斯海姆主教和其他领主工作的工作室制作了珍贵的书籍封面这个可移动的祭坛,我们也可以得出结论,起源于Helmarshausen的僧侣,或者,为了考虑到施华真斯基的一两个批评者提出的反对意见,希尔德斯海姆或不伦瑞克。这些艺术家结合了自伯恩沃德主教(996-IO22)时代以来蓬勃发展的萨克森州的古老工艺,以及在1872年和1873年亨利公爵十字军东征后从拜占庭引进的新建议,以及在1868年亨利与英格兰国王亨利二世的女儿玛蒂尔达公主结婚后从温彻斯特引进的新建议。再一次回到祭坛的近代史,我们甚至可以提出一个解释,说明它是如何成为私人所有的。19世纪初,它的第一任主人雷内斯-布莱德巴赫伯爵是特里夫斯大主教的枢密院委员
Saints in whose honour the portable altar was dedicated and whose names appear on the back. 'Bernardus' is by no means a misspelling for 'Bernwardus'; in fact, the portrait represents Bishop Bernard I ( 1301153), who founded the Benedictine abbey of St. Godehard and here enjoyed veneration as a Saint. It remains to explain the dedicatory inscription of "Thidericus abbas tertius." The difficulty which puzzled Labarte and Goldschmidt is easily overcome by interpreting it, not as "Thierry the Third, Abbot of...," but as "Thierry, third Abbot of...." As a matter of fact, the Abbots of St. Godehard's, Hildesheim, used to number themselves according to their respective place in the succession of abbots from the foundation of the abbey onward. Thus the first three abbots were called 'Fridericus abbas primus' (ca. I 40o-ca. I 55), 'Arnoldus abbas secundus' (ca. 1155-1181), and 'Thidericus abbas tertius' (I18I-1204) respectively. This date and place of the portable altar fit in with the detailed description given by Georg Swarzenski of the artistic activities in Saxony during the second half of the I2th century.' Swarzenski had already a reason for mentioning the Abbey of St. Godehard as a place where works of art were appreciated : Frederick, its first abbot, commissioned a precious book cover at the studio where goldsmiths, scribes and other artists worked for Henry the Lion (1142I 195), the Bishops of Hildesheim, and other lords spiritual and temporal.2 This portable altar, too, we may conclude, originated with the same monks of Helmarshausen, or, to make allowance for the objections raised by one or two of Swarzenski's critics, of Hildesheim or Brunswick. These artists combined the old craftsmanship of Saxony, which had flourished ever since the time of Bishop Bernward (996-IO22), with the fresh suggestions imported from Byzantium after the crusade of Duke Henry, in I I72,3 and from Winchester after Henry's marriage with Princess Matilda, daughter of King Henry II of England, in Ix68. To return once more to the recent history of the altar, we may even suggest an explanation of how it came into private ownership. Count Renesse-Breidbach, its first owner at the beginning of the I9th century, was a Privy Councillor of the Archbishop of Treves.4 It was to Treves Cathedral that