直接空气捕获技术:净碳影响的研究

Manander Singh, Ryan Sharston
{"title":"直接空气捕获技术:净碳影响的研究","authors":"Manander Singh, Ryan Sharston","doi":"10.35483/acsa.aia.fallintercarbon.20.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, Direct Air Capture (DAC) has been emerging as a promising negative emission technology, primarily due to its flexibility of location and capability to absorb CO2, generated from non-localized sources. This study evaluates the two variants of DAC i.e. DAC-1 utilizing liquid solvents and DAC-2 using solid sorbents, in terms of overall emissions generated as a result of the process of CO2 removal from atmosphere. It was found that majority of overall emissions generated during the life cycle of DAC, may be attributed to the operational phase. The operational emissions were then classified into three major steps i.e. CO2 capture, CO2 separation and compression. The impact of the choice of energy source on generated emissions was then analyzed in the cases of both DAC-1 and DAC-2, separately for the three classifications. Both the variants were found to be reasonably efficient in terms of net CO2 removed from atmosphere, provided the energy requirements are sourced from renewable energy resources. Additionally, we analyzed the secondary impacts in terms of land use requirements and water loss during the process.","PeriodicalId":288990,"journal":{"name":"2020 AIA/ACSA Intersections Research Conference: CARBON","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct Air Capture Technology: An Investigation of Net Carbon Impacts\",\"authors\":\"Manander Singh, Ryan Sharston\",\"doi\":\"10.35483/acsa.aia.fallintercarbon.20.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, Direct Air Capture (DAC) has been emerging as a promising negative emission technology, primarily due to its flexibility of location and capability to absorb CO2, generated from non-localized sources. This study evaluates the two variants of DAC i.e. DAC-1 utilizing liquid solvents and DAC-2 using solid sorbents, in terms of overall emissions generated as a result of the process of CO2 removal from atmosphere. It was found that majority of overall emissions generated during the life cycle of DAC, may be attributed to the operational phase. The operational emissions were then classified into three major steps i.e. CO2 capture, CO2 separation and compression. The impact of the choice of energy source on generated emissions was then analyzed in the cases of both DAC-1 and DAC-2, separately for the three classifications. Both the variants were found to be reasonably efficient in terms of net CO2 removed from atmosphere, provided the energy requirements are sourced from renewable energy resources. Additionally, we analyzed the secondary impacts in terms of land use requirements and water loss during the process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 AIA/ACSA Intersections Research Conference: CARBON\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 AIA/ACSA Intersections Research Conference: CARBON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.aia.fallintercarbon.20.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 AIA/ACSA Intersections Research Conference: CARBON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.aia.fallintercarbon.20.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,直接空气捕获(DAC)作为一种有前途的负排放技术已经出现,主要是因为其位置的灵活性和吸收非本地源产生的二氧化碳的能力。本研究评估了DAC的两种变体,即使用液体溶剂的DAC-1和使用固体吸附剂的DAC-2,根据从大气中去除CO2过程产生的总排放量。研究发现,在DAC的生命周期内产生的大部分总排放量可归因于操作阶段。然后将操作排放分为三个主要步骤,即CO2捕获,CO2分离和压缩。然后,在DAC-1和DAC-2的情况下,对三种分类分别分析了能源选择对产生的排放的影响。如果能源需求来自可再生能源,就从大气中去除的净二氧化碳而言,这两种变体都是相当有效的。此外,从土地利用需求和水土流失两个方面分析了该过程的次生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct Air Capture Technology: An Investigation of Net Carbon Impacts
In recent years, Direct Air Capture (DAC) has been emerging as a promising negative emission technology, primarily due to its flexibility of location and capability to absorb CO2, generated from non-localized sources. This study evaluates the two variants of DAC i.e. DAC-1 utilizing liquid solvents and DAC-2 using solid sorbents, in terms of overall emissions generated as a result of the process of CO2 removal from atmosphere. It was found that majority of overall emissions generated during the life cycle of DAC, may be attributed to the operational phase. The operational emissions were then classified into three major steps i.e. CO2 capture, CO2 separation and compression. The impact of the choice of energy source on generated emissions was then analyzed in the cases of both DAC-1 and DAC-2, separately for the three classifications. Both the variants were found to be reasonably efficient in terms of net CO2 removed from atmosphere, provided the energy requirements are sourced from renewable energy resources. Additionally, we analyzed the secondary impacts in terms of land use requirements and water loss during the process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信