制定环境和气候变化政策的框架:来自环境宏观经济学的视角

Seck L. Tan, Dodo J. Thampapillai
{"title":"制定环境和气候变化政策的框架:来自环境宏观经济学的视角","authors":"Seck L. Tan, Dodo J. Thampapillai","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2335864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the significant differences that would emerge in policy formulation, when environmental capital (KN) is explicitly accounted for in macroeconomic analyses. These differences are illustrated with reference to two selected Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) economies namely, Australia and Canada. The main analytic framework considered is a factor utilization function – which traditionally deals with Labour (L) and manufactured Capital (KM). The development of a three-factor function in terms of L, KM and KN enables the display of mistaken notions of economic performance. That is in the absence of KN, policy makers overstate the performance of L and KM. The recognition of mistaken levels of performance with reference to KM and L in standard macroeconomic analyses enables the identification of policy avenues to protect and enhance KN. As illustrated in the paper, the implication of developing and applying environmental-macroeconomic frameworks for formulating environmental and climate change policies is significant.","PeriodicalId":118088,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: International Affairs Issues (Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frameworks for Formulating Environmental and Climate Change Policies: Perspectives from Environmental-Macroeconomics\",\"authors\":\"Seck L. Tan, Dodo J. Thampapillai\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2335864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the significant differences that would emerge in policy formulation, when environmental capital (KN) is explicitly accounted for in macroeconomic analyses. These differences are illustrated with reference to two selected Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) economies namely, Australia and Canada. The main analytic framework considered is a factor utilization function – which traditionally deals with Labour (L) and manufactured Capital (KM). The development of a three-factor function in terms of L, KM and KN enables the display of mistaken notions of economic performance. That is in the absence of KN, policy makers overstate the performance of L and KM. The recognition of mistaken levels of performance with reference to KM and L in standard macroeconomic analyses enables the identification of policy avenues to protect and enhance KN. As illustrated in the paper, the implication of developing and applying environmental-macroeconomic frameworks for formulating environmental and climate change policies is significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: International Affairs Issues (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: International Affairs Issues (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2335864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: International Affairs Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2335864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是证明在宏观经济分析中明确考虑环境资本(KN)时,政策制定中将出现的重大差异。经济合作与发展组织(经合发组织)选定的两个经济体,即澳大利亚和加拿大,说明了这些差异。考虑的主要分析框架是一个要素利用函数-传统上处理劳动力(L)和制造资本(KM)。以L、KM和KN为代表的三因素函数的发展使经济绩效的错误观念得以显现。也就是说,在没有KN的情况下,政策制定者夸大了L和KM的表现。认识到在标准宏观经济分析中参照知识产权和知识产权的错误绩效水平,可以确定保护和提高知识产权的政策途径。如本文所述,开发和应用环境宏观经济框架对制定环境和气候变化政策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frameworks for Formulating Environmental and Climate Change Policies: Perspectives from Environmental-Macroeconomics
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the significant differences that would emerge in policy formulation, when environmental capital (KN) is explicitly accounted for in macroeconomic analyses. These differences are illustrated with reference to two selected Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) economies namely, Australia and Canada. The main analytic framework considered is a factor utilization function – which traditionally deals with Labour (L) and manufactured Capital (KM). The development of a three-factor function in terms of L, KM and KN enables the display of mistaken notions of economic performance. That is in the absence of KN, policy makers overstate the performance of L and KM. The recognition of mistaken levels of performance with reference to KM and L in standard macroeconomic analyses enables the identification of policy avenues to protect and enhance KN. As illustrated in the paper, the implication of developing and applying environmental-macroeconomic frameworks for formulating environmental and climate change policies is significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信