现代俄罗斯宗教派别与科学界的关系

Tatyana N. Klementyeva
{"title":"现代俄罗斯宗教派别与科学界的关系","authors":"Tatyana N. Klementyeva","doi":"10.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-2-94-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. In modern philosophical literature, three positions of the relationship between science and religion in the modern world are highlighted – conflict, complementarity and dialogue, synthesis and integration. To determine the attitude of the participants of this interaction themselves, believers and scientists, a sociological study was conducted. \nPurpose. The purpose of the study was to research the attitude of representatives of religious denominations of modern Russia to science and the scientific community. Achieving this goal involved studying the attitude of representatives of religious denominations to the scientific community, to science as a way of knowing reality, to the conflict between science and religion, as well as to the possibility of scientific proof of religious beliefs. \nMaterials and methods. The main research method was an expert survey, which was conducted in the form of an in-depth interview and a questionnaire survey. A total of 23 experts were interviewed, who were divided into two groups representing biblical and Eastern religions. \nResults. Based on the analysis of the results obtained, it was concluded that of the three points of view on the relationship between religion and science, the position of conflict is the least popular. However, there are more supporters of the idea of a conflict between religion and science among representatives of biblical religions than among representatives of Eastern religions. The point of view that asserts the possibility of a synthesis of religion and science is also not widespread, and is typical mainly for representatives of Eastern religions who have deep knowledge in the field of natural sciences. The most common point of view is the position of complementarity of science and religion, expressed in the possibility of using scientific data to confirm the main provisions of the religious worldview.","PeriodicalId":288940,"journal":{"name":"Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RELATIONSHIPS RELIGIOUS DENOMINATIONS AND THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY IN MODERN RUSSIA\",\"authors\":\"Tatyana N. Klementyeva\",\"doi\":\"10.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-2-94-115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. In modern philosophical literature, three positions of the relationship between science and religion in the modern world are highlighted – conflict, complementarity and dialogue, synthesis and integration. To determine the attitude of the participants of this interaction themselves, believers and scientists, a sociological study was conducted. \\nPurpose. The purpose of the study was to research the attitude of representatives of religious denominations of modern Russia to science and the scientific community. Achieving this goal involved studying the attitude of representatives of religious denominations to the scientific community, to science as a way of knowing reality, to the conflict between science and religion, as well as to the possibility of scientific proof of religious beliefs. \\nMaterials and methods. The main research method was an expert survey, which was conducted in the form of an in-depth interview and a questionnaire survey. A total of 23 experts were interviewed, who were divided into two groups representing biblical and Eastern religions. \\nResults. Based on the analysis of the results obtained, it was concluded that of the three points of view on the relationship between religion and science, the position of conflict is the least popular. However, there are more supporters of the idea of a conflict between religion and science among representatives of biblical religions than among representatives of Eastern religions. The point of view that asserts the possibility of a synthesis of religion and science is also not widespread, and is typical mainly for representatives of Eastern religions who have deep knowledge in the field of natural sciences. The most common point of view is the position of complementarity of science and religion, expressed in the possibility of using scientific data to confirm the main provisions of the religious worldview.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-2-94-115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-2-94-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。在现代哲学文献中,科学与宗教的关系在现代世界中突出了冲突、互补与对话、综合与融合的三个位置。为了确定这种互动的参与者本身,信徒和科学家的态度,进行了一项社会学研究。目的。这项研究的目的是研究现代俄罗斯宗教派别的代表对科学和科学界的态度。要实现这一目标,需要研究宗教派别的代表对科学界的态度,对科学作为认识现实的一种方式的态度,对科学与宗教之间的冲突的态度,以及对科学证明宗教信仰的可能性的态度。材料和方法。主要的研究方法是专家调查,采用深度访谈和问卷调查的形式进行。共有23名专家接受了采访,他们被分为代表圣经和东方宗教的两组。结果。通过对所得结果的分析,得出结论:在宗教与科学关系的三种观点中,冲突的立场是最不受欢迎的。然而,在圣经宗教的代表中,比在东方宗教的代表中,有更多的人支持宗教与科学之间冲突的观点。断言宗教与科学的综合可能性的观点也不普遍,主要是在自然科学领域具有深厚知识的东方宗教代表的典型观点。最常见的观点是科学与宗教的互补地位,表现在可以用科学数据来证实宗教世界观的主要规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RELATIONSHIPS RELIGIOUS DENOMINATIONS AND THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY IN MODERN RUSSIA
Background. In modern philosophical literature, three positions of the relationship between science and religion in the modern world are highlighted – conflict, complementarity and dialogue, synthesis and integration. To determine the attitude of the participants of this interaction themselves, believers and scientists, a sociological study was conducted. Purpose. The purpose of the study was to research the attitude of representatives of religious denominations of modern Russia to science and the scientific community. Achieving this goal involved studying the attitude of representatives of religious denominations to the scientific community, to science as a way of knowing reality, to the conflict between science and religion, as well as to the possibility of scientific proof of religious beliefs. Materials and methods. The main research method was an expert survey, which was conducted in the form of an in-depth interview and a questionnaire survey. A total of 23 experts were interviewed, who were divided into two groups representing biblical and Eastern religions. Results. Based on the analysis of the results obtained, it was concluded that of the three points of view on the relationship between religion and science, the position of conflict is the least popular. However, there are more supporters of the idea of a conflict between religion and science among representatives of biblical religions than among representatives of Eastern religions. The point of view that asserts the possibility of a synthesis of religion and science is also not widespread, and is typical mainly for representatives of Eastern religions who have deep knowledge in the field of natural sciences. The most common point of view is the position of complementarity of science and religion, expressed in the possibility of using scientific data to confirm the main provisions of the religious worldview.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信