Jørund Aasetre
{"title":"Kampen om utmarka: Hytter, beitemark eller urørt natur?","authors":"Jørund Aasetre","doi":"10.23865/noasp.151.ch4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Norwegian outfields (utmark), traditional agricultural use, nature conservation, tourism and second home development are opposing interests. This chapter focuses on the municipality of Oppdal and key discourses regarding future land use. Furthermore, how those discourses can lead to continuity or changes in the balance of power in relation to land-use management. The chapter is based on different sources. One is a project focusing on drawing up a master plan for destination development in Oppdal. Other sources include three years of experience holding field courses for natural resource management students at NTNU, in addition to a literature search. Four different discourses related to management of the outfields are identified. Second home development has been an important economic driving force in the local community, and one can identify this as a dominant discourse in the Oppdal community. Against this discourse, there are two other critical discourses. First, there is a discourse considering second home development as a threat to agriculture and grazing rights. The second is a nature conservation-oriented discourse that views second home development as a threat to nature values. As an attempt to bridge these opposing perspectives, a “win-win discourse” has been developed with a focus on sustainable second home development. The question is, does this represent a sufficient reorganization of land use or, on the contrary, represent a “greenwashing” of second home industry? This is an open question, but if we look at other environmental conflicts, then critical discourses often develop in opposition to such “win-win discourses”. Either way, Oppdal is facing some major decisions in relation to future land management.","PeriodicalId":273764,"journal":{"name":"Utmark i endring","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utmark i endring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.151.ch4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在挪威的外野(奥特马克),传统农业用途、自然保护、旅游和第二家园开发是相互对立的利益。本章重点介绍奥普达尔市和有关未来土地利用的关键论述。此外,这些论述如何能够导致与土地使用管理有关的权力平衡的连续性或变化。这一章基于不同的资料。其中一个项目的重点是为奥普达尔的目的地发展拟订总体规划。其他资料来源包括三年在台大为自然资源管理学生举办实地课程的经验,以及文献检索。确定了与外场管理有关的四种不同的话语。第二住宅开发一直是当地社区重要的经济驱动力,人们可以将其视为Oppdal社区的主导话语。与此相反,还有另外两种批判话语。首先,有一种论述认为第二家园的发展是对农业和放牧权的威胁。第二种是以自然保护为导向的话语,认为第二家园的发展是对自然价值的威胁。为了弥合这些对立的观点,一种“双赢话语”已经发展起来,重点是可持续的第二套住房发展。问题是,这是否代表了土地利用的充分重组,还是相反,代表了第二家园产业的“绿色清洗”?这是一个开放的问题,但如果我们看看其他环境冲突,那么批评话语往往是与这种“双赢话语”相反发展的。无论哪种方式,Oppdal都面临着一些与未来土地管理有关的重大决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kampen om utmarka: Hytter, beitemark eller urørt natur?
In the Norwegian outfields (utmark), traditional agricultural use, nature conservation, tourism and second home development are opposing interests. This chapter focuses on the municipality of Oppdal and key discourses regarding future land use. Furthermore, how those discourses can lead to continuity or changes in the balance of power in relation to land-use management. The chapter is based on different sources. One is a project focusing on drawing up a master plan for destination development in Oppdal. Other sources include three years of experience holding field courses for natural resource management students at NTNU, in addition to a literature search. Four different discourses related to management of the outfields are identified. Second home development has been an important economic driving force in the local community, and one can identify this as a dominant discourse in the Oppdal community. Against this discourse, there are two other critical discourses. First, there is a discourse considering second home development as a threat to agriculture and grazing rights. The second is a nature conservation-oriented discourse that views second home development as a threat to nature values. As an attempt to bridge these opposing perspectives, a “win-win discourse” has been developed with a focus on sustainable second home development. The question is, does this represent a sufficient reorganization of land use or, on the contrary, represent a “greenwashing” of second home industry? This is an open question, but if we look at other environmental conflicts, then critical discourses often develop in opposition to such “win-win discourses”. Either way, Oppdal is facing some major decisions in relation to future land management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信