纳博科夫vs陀思妥耶夫斯基:标准的二重性和传达的普遍信息

M. Amine, Imane Hind Sari
{"title":"纳博科夫vs陀思妥耶夫斯基:标准的二重性和传达的普遍信息","authors":"M. Amine, Imane Hind Sari","doi":"10.7816/ulakbilge-09-61-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literature underwent thousands of phases that caused people to react distinctly to the endless fluid of literary perception. The purpose of this study is to highlight the impact this continuity of changes had and still have on literary criticism. To epitomize the previous idea, we had to juxtapose the lives of two writers who witnessed different eras: Dostoevsky and Nabokov. The two figures experienced their intertwined fates with variant attitudes and welcomed all the occurrences with an open mind, a number of life-changing works sprang up from their collections of events and particularly personal accounts. This paper also aims to psychologically apply the former nuances of Nabokov’s criticism on Dostoevsky on his own writings in order to demonstrate the identical traits of the literary artist. The Jungian Theory served in this sense to bridge the gap between them and emphasize the emergence of the collective unconscious in the literary realm. Keywords: community, criticism, Jungian Theory, collective unconsciousness","PeriodicalId":187770,"journal":{"name":"Ulakbilge Dergisi","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NABOKOV VS. DOSTOEVSKY: THE DUALITY OF STANDARDS AND A UNIVERSAL MESSAGE CONVEYED\",\"authors\":\"M. Amine, Imane Hind Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.7816/ulakbilge-09-61-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Literature underwent thousands of phases that caused people to react distinctly to the endless fluid of literary perception. The purpose of this study is to highlight the impact this continuity of changes had and still have on literary criticism. To epitomize the previous idea, we had to juxtapose the lives of two writers who witnessed different eras: Dostoevsky and Nabokov. The two figures experienced their intertwined fates with variant attitudes and welcomed all the occurrences with an open mind, a number of life-changing works sprang up from their collections of events and particularly personal accounts. This paper also aims to psychologically apply the former nuances of Nabokov’s criticism on Dostoevsky on his own writings in order to demonstrate the identical traits of the literary artist. The Jungian Theory served in this sense to bridge the gap between them and emphasize the emergence of the collective unconscious in the literary realm. Keywords: community, criticism, Jungian Theory, collective unconsciousness\",\"PeriodicalId\":187770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulakbilge Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulakbilge Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7816/ulakbilge-09-61-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulakbilge Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7816/ulakbilge-09-61-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文学经历了千变万化的阶段,使人们对文学感知的无尽流动产生了不同的反应。本研究的目的是强调这种变化的连续性对文学批评的影响。为了体现之前的观点,我们不得不把见证了不同时代的两位作家的生活放在一起:陀思妥耶夫斯基和纳博科夫。这两个人物以不同的态度经历了他们交织在一起的命运,并以开放的心态迎接所有发生的事情,许多改变生活的作品从他们的事件收集中涌现出来,特别是个人的叙述。本文还试图将纳博科夫批评陀思妥耶夫斯基的前几处细微之处从心理上运用到自己的作品中,以显示这位文学艺术家的相同特征。荣格理论在这个意义上弥补了他们之间的差距,并强调了集体无意识在文学领域的出现。关键词:社区,批评,荣格理论,集体无意识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NABOKOV VS. DOSTOEVSKY: THE DUALITY OF STANDARDS AND A UNIVERSAL MESSAGE CONVEYED
Literature underwent thousands of phases that caused people to react distinctly to the endless fluid of literary perception. The purpose of this study is to highlight the impact this continuity of changes had and still have on literary criticism. To epitomize the previous idea, we had to juxtapose the lives of two writers who witnessed different eras: Dostoevsky and Nabokov. The two figures experienced their intertwined fates with variant attitudes and welcomed all the occurrences with an open mind, a number of life-changing works sprang up from their collections of events and particularly personal accounts. This paper also aims to psychologically apply the former nuances of Nabokov’s criticism on Dostoevsky on his own writings in order to demonstrate the identical traits of the literary artist. The Jungian Theory served in this sense to bridge the gap between them and emphasize the emergence of the collective unconscious in the literary realm. Keywords: community, criticism, Jungian Theory, collective unconsciousness
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信