{"title":"阑尾炎穿孔——冲洗还是引流?","authors":"E Normann, E Korvald, T Lotveit","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A comparison was made regarding the observed frequency of intraperitoneal complications between two groups of patients operated upon for perforated appendicitis during a 5-year period (1968-73). The two groups, corresponding to two different general surgical departments at the same hospital, were given different forms of adjuvant treatment. The first group (78 patients) received postoperative intraperitoneal lavage, with antibiotics added to the lavage solution. In the other department (77 patients), the peritoneal cavity was drained postoperatively. No lavage was performed in this group, but antibiotics were given systemically. Sixteen patients in the drainage group developed intraperitoneal complications, as compared with 5 in the lavage group.</p>","PeriodicalId":75496,"journal":{"name":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Fenniae","volume":"64 4","pages":"195-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perforated appendicitis--lavage or drainage?\",\"authors\":\"E Normann, E Korvald, T Lotveit\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A comparison was made regarding the observed frequency of intraperitoneal complications between two groups of patients operated upon for perforated appendicitis during a 5-year period (1968-73). The two groups, corresponding to two different general surgical departments at the same hospital, were given different forms of adjuvant treatment. The first group (78 patients) received postoperative intraperitoneal lavage, with antibiotics added to the lavage solution. In the other department (77 patients), the peritoneal cavity was drained postoperatively. No lavage was performed in this group, but antibiotics were given systemically. Sixteen patients in the drainage group developed intraperitoneal complications, as compared with 5 in the lavage group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Fenniae\",\"volume\":\"64 4\",\"pages\":\"195-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Fenniae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Fenniae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison was made regarding the observed frequency of intraperitoneal complications between two groups of patients operated upon for perforated appendicitis during a 5-year period (1968-73). The two groups, corresponding to two different general surgical departments at the same hospital, were given different forms of adjuvant treatment. The first group (78 patients) received postoperative intraperitoneal lavage, with antibiotics added to the lavage solution. In the other department (77 patients), the peritoneal cavity was drained postoperatively. No lavage was performed in this group, but antibiotics were given systemically. Sixteen patients in the drainage group developed intraperitoneal complications, as compared with 5 in the lavage group.