阑尾炎穿孔——冲洗还是引流?

E Normann, E Korvald, T Lotveit
{"title":"阑尾炎穿孔——冲洗还是引流?","authors":"E Normann,&nbsp;E Korvald,&nbsp;T Lotveit","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A comparison was made regarding the observed frequency of intraperitoneal complications between two groups of patients operated upon for perforated appendicitis during a 5-year period (1968-73). The two groups, corresponding to two different general surgical departments at the same hospital, were given different forms of adjuvant treatment. The first group (78 patients) received postoperative intraperitoneal lavage, with antibiotics added to the lavage solution. In the other department (77 patients), the peritoneal cavity was drained postoperatively. No lavage was performed in this group, but antibiotics were given systemically. Sixteen patients in the drainage group developed intraperitoneal complications, as compared with 5 in the lavage group.</p>","PeriodicalId":75496,"journal":{"name":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Fenniae","volume":"64 4","pages":"195-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perforated appendicitis--lavage or drainage?\",\"authors\":\"E Normann,&nbsp;E Korvald,&nbsp;T Lotveit\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A comparison was made regarding the observed frequency of intraperitoneal complications between two groups of patients operated upon for perforated appendicitis during a 5-year period (1968-73). The two groups, corresponding to two different general surgical departments at the same hospital, were given different forms of adjuvant treatment. The first group (78 patients) received postoperative intraperitoneal lavage, with antibiotics added to the lavage solution. In the other department (77 patients), the peritoneal cavity was drained postoperatively. No lavage was performed in this group, but antibiotics were given systemically. Sixteen patients in the drainage group developed intraperitoneal complications, as compared with 5 in the lavage group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Fenniae\",\"volume\":\"64 4\",\"pages\":\"195-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Fenniae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Fenniae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较两组手术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎5年间(1968-73)腹腔内并发症的发生率。两组分别对应同一医院两个不同的普外科,给予不同形式的辅助治疗。第一组78例患者术后腹腔灌洗,灌洗液中加入抗生素。另一科(77例)术后腹腔引流。本组患者未行灌洗,但给予全身抗生素治疗。引流组16例出现腹腔内并发症,灌洗组5例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perforated appendicitis--lavage or drainage?

A comparison was made regarding the observed frequency of intraperitoneal complications between two groups of patients operated upon for perforated appendicitis during a 5-year period (1968-73). The two groups, corresponding to two different general surgical departments at the same hospital, were given different forms of adjuvant treatment. The first group (78 patients) received postoperative intraperitoneal lavage, with antibiotics added to the lavage solution. In the other department (77 patients), the peritoneal cavity was drained postoperatively. No lavage was performed in this group, but antibiotics were given systemically. Sixteen patients in the drainage group developed intraperitoneal complications, as compared with 5 in the lavage group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信