{"title":"FANET应用场景及移动模型","authors":"Armir Bujari, C. Palazzi, D. Ronzani","doi":"10.1145/3086439.3086440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"FANETs are a promising solution for application scenarios involving UAVs. There are many mobility models that can be used to reproduce the behavior of the mobile nodes in an ad-hoc network, but some of these cannot simulate the realistic motion of UAVs. In this paper we list the available mobility models and try to understand which ones should be adopted for different FANET application scenarios, discussing their pros and cons.","PeriodicalId":375836,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FANET Application Scenarios and Mobility Models\",\"authors\":\"Armir Bujari, C. Palazzi, D. Ronzani\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3086439.3086440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"FANETs are a promising solution for application scenarios involving UAVs. There are many mobility models that can be used to reproduce the behavior of the mobile nodes in an ad-hoc network, but some of these cannot simulate the realistic motion of UAVs. In this paper we list the available mobility models and try to understand which ones should be adopted for different FANET application scenarios, discussing their pros and cons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3086439.3086440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3086439.3086440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
FANETs are a promising solution for application scenarios involving UAVs. There are many mobility models that can be used to reproduce the behavior of the mobile nodes in an ad-hoc network, but some of these cannot simulate the realistic motion of UAVs. In this paper we list the available mobility models and try to understand which ones should be adopted for different FANET application scenarios, discussing their pros and cons.