作为环境管理系统工具的塞萨洛尼基港口生态足迹分析

E. Bintoudi, M. Baert, M. Drakaki
{"title":"作为环境管理系统工具的塞萨洛尼基港口生态足迹分析","authors":"E. Bintoudi, M. Baert, M. Drakaki","doi":"10.46354/i3m.2020.hms.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ports exert complex and highly significant impacts in the air, sea and land environmental components, including pollution, habitat degradation, biodiversity loss, and impacts on human health. The Ecological Footprint (EF) methodology is a tool of growing popularity that assesses the CO 2 emissions-related environmental impact. Within a broader Environmental Management System, the EF can provide a simple index to inform policy decisions. However, only a few studies have applied the EF methodology at ports. In this study the EF methodology was employed in order to assess the CO 2 emissions-related EF of the port of Thessaloniki (THPA), a mid-sized cargo and passenger port in Northern Greece, for two consecutive years, 2008 and 2009. The activities of the port were divided into six components: built-up land, population (port staff), electricity consumption, fuel consumption, solid waste producti on and wastewater production. THPA’s total EF was higher compared to the ports of other studies, mainly due to the higher electricity and fuel consumption and the fact that the Greek electricity sector has a higher CO 2 emission factor. The limitations of the EF when applied at ports are discussed and alternative tools, methodologies and frameworks are suggested for environmental management at ports.","PeriodicalId":225994,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Harbor, Maritime and Multimodal Logistic Modeling & Simulation(HMS 2020)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological footprint analysis of the port of Thessaloniki as a tool for an environmental management system\",\"authors\":\"E. Bintoudi, M. Baert, M. Drakaki\",\"doi\":\"10.46354/i3m.2020.hms.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ports exert complex and highly significant impacts in the air, sea and land environmental components, including pollution, habitat degradation, biodiversity loss, and impacts on human health. The Ecological Footprint (EF) methodology is a tool of growing popularity that assesses the CO 2 emissions-related environmental impact. Within a broader Environmental Management System, the EF can provide a simple index to inform policy decisions. However, only a few studies have applied the EF methodology at ports. In this study the EF methodology was employed in order to assess the CO 2 emissions-related EF of the port of Thessaloniki (THPA), a mid-sized cargo and passenger port in Northern Greece, for two consecutive years, 2008 and 2009. The activities of the port were divided into six components: built-up land, population (port staff), electricity consumption, fuel consumption, solid waste producti on and wastewater production. THPA’s total EF was higher compared to the ports of other studies, mainly due to the higher electricity and fuel consumption and the fact that the Greek electricity sector has a higher CO 2 emission factor. The limitations of the EF when applied at ports are discussed and alternative tools, methodologies and frameworks are suggested for environmental management at ports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":225994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Harbor, Maritime and Multimodal Logistic Modeling & Simulation(HMS 2020)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Harbor, Maritime and Multimodal Logistic Modeling & Simulation(HMS 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2020.hms.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Harbor, Maritime and Multimodal Logistic Modeling & Simulation(HMS 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2020.hms.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

港口对空气、海洋和陆地环境因素产生复杂而高度显著的影响,包括污染、栖息地退化、生物多样性丧失以及对人类健康的影响。生态足迹(EF)方法是一种越来越受欢迎的评估二氧化碳排放相关环境影响的工具。在更广泛的环境管理体系内,环境指数可以提供一个简单的指数,为政策决策提供信息。然而,只有少数研究将EF方法应用于港口。在本研究中,EF方法被用于评估塞萨洛尼基港口(THPA)的二氧化碳排放相关EF,这是希腊北部的一个中型货运和客运港口,连续两年,2008年和2009年。港口的活动分为六个组成部分:建筑用地、人口(港口工作人员)、电力消耗、燃料消耗、固体废物产生和废水产生。与其他研究的港口相比,THPA的总EF更高,主要是由于更高的电力和燃料消耗,以及希腊电力部门具有更高的二氧化碳排放系数。本文讨论了港口环境管理的局限性,并提出了港口环境管理的替代工具、方法和框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological footprint analysis of the port of Thessaloniki as a tool for an environmental management system
Ports exert complex and highly significant impacts in the air, sea and land environmental components, including pollution, habitat degradation, biodiversity loss, and impacts on human health. The Ecological Footprint (EF) methodology is a tool of growing popularity that assesses the CO 2 emissions-related environmental impact. Within a broader Environmental Management System, the EF can provide a simple index to inform policy decisions. However, only a few studies have applied the EF methodology at ports. In this study the EF methodology was employed in order to assess the CO 2 emissions-related EF of the port of Thessaloniki (THPA), a mid-sized cargo and passenger port in Northern Greece, for two consecutive years, 2008 and 2009. The activities of the port were divided into six components: built-up land, population (port staff), electricity consumption, fuel consumption, solid waste producti on and wastewater production. THPA’s total EF was higher compared to the ports of other studies, mainly due to the higher electricity and fuel consumption and the fact that the Greek electricity sector has a higher CO 2 emission factor. The limitations of the EF when applied at ports are discussed and alternative tools, methodologies and frameworks are suggested for environmental management at ports.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信