巴西里约热内卢市社会创新的理论与实践

Rita de Cássia Oliveira Marcelino Afonso, D. Kleine, Gabriel Orsi-Tinoco
{"title":"巴西里约热内卢市社会创新的理论与实践","authors":"Rita de Cássia Oliveira Marcelino Afonso, D. Kleine, Gabriel Orsi-Tinoco","doi":"10.5902/1983465965071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This article reviews the literature on social innovation, also focusing on Latin American production, identifying how the contents dialogue with the reality of initiatives in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.\nDesign/methodology/approach: Qualitative research mapped 53 social innovation initiatives with some digital use and analyzed 20 of these initiatives. Using a descriptive exploratory methodology, the study was conducted in five stages: (1) review of the literature, (2) mapping of the initiatives, (3) the selection of 20 initiatives, (4) interviews and analysis, (5) a discussion workshop on the results.\nFindings: The results indicate that the researched initiatives differ a little in relation to the literature. More specifically, this analysis helped perceive that in the city, (1) social innovations occur almost exclusively through the movement of civil society actors, (2) there is little to none, or only indirect articulation with governments and public policies, and (3) digital use and management remain reactive rather than strategic and are almost exclusively centered on social networks, both as a communication and management tool.\nResearch limitations/implications: This study cannot be generalized for the city since the sample was identified by voluntary adherence of the initiatives to an internet call.\nOriginality/value: This study contributes to knowledge on social innovations in the city of Rio de Janeiro, providing elements for debate by public and private decision makers, in addition to academic interest and shows the need for knowledge production for management rooted in the local context and reality.","PeriodicalId":197586,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory and practice in social innovations in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Rita de Cássia Oliveira Marcelino Afonso, D. Kleine, Gabriel Orsi-Tinoco\",\"doi\":\"10.5902/1983465965071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This article reviews the literature on social innovation, also focusing on Latin American production, identifying how the contents dialogue with the reality of initiatives in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.\\nDesign/methodology/approach: Qualitative research mapped 53 social innovation initiatives with some digital use and analyzed 20 of these initiatives. Using a descriptive exploratory methodology, the study was conducted in five stages: (1) review of the literature, (2) mapping of the initiatives, (3) the selection of 20 initiatives, (4) interviews and analysis, (5) a discussion workshop on the results.\\nFindings: The results indicate that the researched initiatives differ a little in relation to the literature. More specifically, this analysis helped perceive that in the city, (1) social innovations occur almost exclusively through the movement of civil society actors, (2) there is little to none, or only indirect articulation with governments and public policies, and (3) digital use and management remain reactive rather than strategic and are almost exclusively centered on social networks, both as a communication and management tool.\\nResearch limitations/implications: This study cannot be generalized for the city since the sample was identified by voluntary adherence of the initiatives to an internet call.\\nOriginality/value: This study contributes to knowledge on social innovations in the city of Rio de Janeiro, providing elements for debate by public and private decision makers, in addition to academic interest and shows the need for knowledge production for management rooted in the local context and reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Administração da UFSM\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Administração da UFSM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465965071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465965071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文回顾了有关社会创新的文献,也关注拉丁美洲的生产,确定内容如何与巴西里约热内卢市倡议的现实对话。设计/方法/方法:定性研究绘制了53项社会创新计划,并对其中20项计划进行了分析。本研究采用描述性探索性方法,分五个阶段进行:(1)文献综述,(2)举措映射,(3)20个举措的选择,(4)访谈和分析,(5)结果讨论研讨会。研究结果表明,研究主动性与文献略有不同。更具体地说,这一分析有助于认识到,在城市中,(1)社会创新几乎完全通过公民社会行动者的运动发生;(2)与政府和公共政策几乎没有或只有间接的联系;(3)数字的使用和管理仍然是被动的,而不是战略性的,几乎完全以社会网络为中心,既作为沟通工具,也作为管理工具。研究局限/启示:本研究不能推广到城市,因为样本是通过自愿遵守互联网电话倡议来确定的。原创性/价值:本研究有助于了解里约热内卢市的社会创新,除了学术兴趣之外,还为公共和私人决策者提供了辩论的要素,并显示了基于当地背景和现实的管理知识生产的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theory and practice in social innovations in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Purpose: This article reviews the literature on social innovation, also focusing on Latin American production, identifying how the contents dialogue with the reality of initiatives in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Design/methodology/approach: Qualitative research mapped 53 social innovation initiatives with some digital use and analyzed 20 of these initiatives. Using a descriptive exploratory methodology, the study was conducted in five stages: (1) review of the literature, (2) mapping of the initiatives, (3) the selection of 20 initiatives, (4) interviews and analysis, (5) a discussion workshop on the results. Findings: The results indicate that the researched initiatives differ a little in relation to the literature. More specifically, this analysis helped perceive that in the city, (1) social innovations occur almost exclusively through the movement of civil society actors, (2) there is little to none, or only indirect articulation with governments and public policies, and (3) digital use and management remain reactive rather than strategic and are almost exclusively centered on social networks, both as a communication and management tool. Research limitations/implications: This study cannot be generalized for the city since the sample was identified by voluntary adherence of the initiatives to an internet call. Originality/value: This study contributes to knowledge on social innovations in the city of Rio de Janeiro, providing elements for debate by public and private decision makers, in addition to academic interest and shows the need for knowledge production for management rooted in the local context and reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信