危险废物现场调查和清理:创新技术,一种替代方法

Jr. Albert Robbat
{"title":"危险废物现场调查和清理:创新技术,一种替代方法","authors":"Jr. Albert Robbat","doi":"10.1089/HWM.1994.11.249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much has been made about the high costs associated with hazardous waste site investigations and cleanup. Independent organizations estimate that the current annual environmental market is $1.8 billion each for environmental engineering firms and commercial laboratory services companies. Clearly, with over 1200 hazardous waste, Superfund sites in EPA`s National Priority LIst (NPL) and with current estimates between 10,000 and 50,000 sites at the NPL funnel awaiting investigation, the nation faces a daunting political, social, and economic challenge. With increasing financial pressures placed on state governments and the recent inclusion of federal facilities into the Superfund process, Congress has finally become aware of the high costs and inefficiencies built into Superfund and in the way EPA conducts the site assessment and cleanup process. Federal funding agencies have focused considerable resources to develop innovative, field-based, analytical technologies that can provide real or near-real time chemical information about the site. Some EPA Regions appear to be out in front of the curve, with major site investigation programs being driven by the integration of innovative technologies. Unfortunately, most of these studies are being conducted on an ad hoc basis and are not universal within the agency. This is also true of DOD and DOE.","PeriodicalId":386820,"journal":{"name":"Hazardous waste and hazardous materials","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hazardous waste site investigation and cleanup: Innovative technologies, an alternative approach\",\"authors\":\"Jr. Albert Robbat\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/HWM.1994.11.249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Much has been made about the high costs associated with hazardous waste site investigations and cleanup. Independent organizations estimate that the current annual environmental market is $1.8 billion each for environmental engineering firms and commercial laboratory services companies. Clearly, with over 1200 hazardous waste, Superfund sites in EPA`s National Priority LIst (NPL) and with current estimates between 10,000 and 50,000 sites at the NPL funnel awaiting investigation, the nation faces a daunting political, social, and economic challenge. With increasing financial pressures placed on state governments and the recent inclusion of federal facilities into the Superfund process, Congress has finally become aware of the high costs and inefficiencies built into Superfund and in the way EPA conducts the site assessment and cleanup process. Federal funding agencies have focused considerable resources to develop innovative, field-based, analytical technologies that can provide real or near-real time chemical information about the site. Some EPA Regions appear to be out in front of the curve, with major site investigation programs being driven by the integration of innovative technologies. Unfortunately, most of these studies are being conducted on an ad hoc basis and are not universal within the agency. This is also true of DOD and DOE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":386820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hazardous waste and hazardous materials\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hazardous waste and hazardous materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/HWM.1994.11.249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hazardous waste and hazardous materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/HWM.1994.11.249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于危险废物现场调查和清理的高昂费用,人们已经谈了很多。独立机构估计,目前环境工程公司和商业实验室服务公司每年的环境市场规模分别为18亿美元。显然,在美国环保署的国家优先清单(NPL)中有1200多个危险废物、超级基金站点,目前估计有1万到5万个站点在NPL漏斗中等待调查,美国面临着令人生畏的政治、社会和经济挑战。随着州政府面临越来越大的财政压力,以及最近将联邦设施纳入超级基金进程,国会终于意识到超级基金的高成本和低效率,以及EPA进行现场评估和清理过程的方式。联邦资助机构已经集中了相当多的资源来开发创新的、基于现场的分析技术,这些技术可以提供有关该地点的实时或近实时的化学信息。一些EPA区域似乎走在了曲线的前面,主要的现场调查项目是由创新技术的整合驱动的。不幸的是,大多数这些研究都是在临时基础上进行的,在该机构内并不普遍。国防部和能源部也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hazardous waste site investigation and cleanup: Innovative technologies, an alternative approach
Much has been made about the high costs associated with hazardous waste site investigations and cleanup. Independent organizations estimate that the current annual environmental market is $1.8 billion each for environmental engineering firms and commercial laboratory services companies. Clearly, with over 1200 hazardous waste, Superfund sites in EPA`s National Priority LIst (NPL) and with current estimates between 10,000 and 50,000 sites at the NPL funnel awaiting investigation, the nation faces a daunting political, social, and economic challenge. With increasing financial pressures placed on state governments and the recent inclusion of federal facilities into the Superfund process, Congress has finally become aware of the high costs and inefficiencies built into Superfund and in the way EPA conducts the site assessment and cleanup process. Federal funding agencies have focused considerable resources to develop innovative, field-based, analytical technologies that can provide real or near-real time chemical information about the site. Some EPA Regions appear to be out in front of the curve, with major site investigation programs being driven by the integration of innovative technologies. Unfortunately, most of these studies are being conducted on an ad hoc basis and are not universal within the agency. This is also true of DOD and DOE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信