高性能2.5D和3D集成电路设计空间的成本和热分析

Dylan C. Stow, Itir Akgun, Russell Barnes, P. Gu, Yuan Xie
{"title":"高性能2.5D和3D集成电路设计空间的成本和热分析","authors":"Dylan C. Stow, Itir Akgun, Russell Barnes, P. Gu, Yuan Xie","doi":"10.1109/ISVLSI.2016.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"3D Integration is a promising technology to continue the trend of Moore's law. However, higher density from die stacking introduces thermal challenges that require more expensive packaging and cooling solutions. An alternative integration technology is interposer-based 2.5D design, which has fewer thermal issues but adds extra interposer cost. Designers must be aware of the system-level cost benefits of these choices early in the design process. This paper presents a cost analysis model with wafer costs, 3D bonding costs, and thermal modeling for the optimization of package and cooling costs. The cost model is used to explore the design space of integrated circuits to determine cost-driven enabling points of 2.5D and 3D integration under consideration of design size and power density. Our results suggest that proper use of die-integration technologies can realize substantial cost savings over traditional 2D design, even with the inclusion of packaging and cooling costs. When thermal properties are considered, interposer-based 2.5D integration is predicted to be more cost effective than TSV-based 3D integration, especially when power density is high.","PeriodicalId":140647,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost and Thermal Analysis of High-Performance 2.5D and 3D Integrated Circuit Design Space\",\"authors\":\"Dylan C. Stow, Itir Akgun, Russell Barnes, P. Gu, Yuan Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISVLSI.2016.133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"3D Integration is a promising technology to continue the trend of Moore's law. However, higher density from die stacking introduces thermal challenges that require more expensive packaging and cooling solutions. An alternative integration technology is interposer-based 2.5D design, which has fewer thermal issues but adds extra interposer cost. Designers must be aware of the system-level cost benefits of these choices early in the design process. This paper presents a cost analysis model with wafer costs, 3D bonding costs, and thermal modeling for the optimization of package and cooling costs. The cost model is used to explore the design space of integrated circuits to determine cost-driven enabling points of 2.5D and 3D integration under consideration of design size and power density. Our results suggest that proper use of die-integration technologies can realize substantial cost savings over traditional 2D design, even with the inclusion of packaging and cooling costs. When thermal properties are considered, interposer-based 2.5D integration is predicted to be more cost effective than TSV-based 3D integration, especially when power density is high.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI)\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISVLSI.2016.133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISVLSI.2016.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

3D集成是延续摩尔定律趋势的一项有前途的技术。然而,更高的密度带来的热挑战,需要更昂贵的封装和冷却解决方案。另一种集成技术是基于中间体的2.5D设计,它的热问题较少,但增加了额外的中间体成本。设计师必须在设计过程的早期就意识到这些选择所带来的系统级成本效益。本文提出了一个成本分析模型,包括晶圆成本、3D键合成本和热建模,以优化封装和冷却成本。成本模型用于探索集成电路的设计空间,在考虑设计尺寸和功率密度的情况下,确定2.5D和3D集成的成本驱动使能点。我们的研究结果表明,即使包含封装和冷却成本,正确使用芯片集成技术也可以比传统的2D设计节省大量成本。考虑到热性能,基于中间体的2.5D集成预计比基于tsv的3D集成更具成本效益,特别是在功率密度高的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost and Thermal Analysis of High-Performance 2.5D and 3D Integrated Circuit Design Space
3D Integration is a promising technology to continue the trend of Moore's law. However, higher density from die stacking introduces thermal challenges that require more expensive packaging and cooling solutions. An alternative integration technology is interposer-based 2.5D design, which has fewer thermal issues but adds extra interposer cost. Designers must be aware of the system-level cost benefits of these choices early in the design process. This paper presents a cost analysis model with wafer costs, 3D bonding costs, and thermal modeling for the optimization of package and cooling costs. The cost model is used to explore the design space of integrated circuits to determine cost-driven enabling points of 2.5D and 3D integration under consideration of design size and power density. Our results suggest that proper use of die-integration technologies can realize substantial cost savings over traditional 2D design, even with the inclusion of packaging and cooling costs. When thermal properties are considered, interposer-based 2.5D integration is predicted to be more cost effective than TSV-based 3D integration, especially when power density is high.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信