M. Zowisło
{"title":"Coubertin – the philosopher of paideia","authors":"M. Zowisło","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.2889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents some selected aspects of Pierre de Coubertin’s philosophical anthropology. Coubertin’s philosophy\nof man is conceived as a philosophy of paideia in the perspective of Werner Jaeger, Pierre Hadot and Michel\nFoucault thought. The author describes three possible ways of interpreting Coubertin’s thought: doxographical,\nand creative as well as hermeneutical reconstruction. Next, the possibility of objective criticism of the idealistic vision\nof Coubertin’s Neo-Olympism is taken into consideration. It is pointed out that the principles of such objective\nand antydogmatic criticism were established by Immanuel Kant, and it is proposed to use them in the process\nof critical evaluation of Coubertin’s philosophy. By use of this form of criticism, the foundations and philosophical\nreferences of Coubertin’s pedagogical philosophy can be properly highlighted. The author creates her own hermeneutical\ntrigger, comparing Coubertin’s anthropological refl ection with the somaesthetics of the contemporary\nAmerican pragmatist and philosopher - Richard Shusterman.\n\n","PeriodicalId":354319,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Sport Humanities","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Sport Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.2889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了顾拜旦哲学人类学的几个方面。顾拜旦的人的哲学被认为是维尔纳·耶格、皮埃尔·哈多和米歇尔·福柯思想视角下的人的哲学。作者描述了三种可能的解释顾拜旦思想的方式:体现学的、创造性的和解释学的重建。其次,对顾拜旦新奥林匹克主义的理想主义视野进行客观批判的可能性进行了探讨。指出这种客观的、反教条的批判原则是由康德确立的,并建议在对顾拜旦哲学进行批判评价的过程中运用这些原则。利用这种批评形式,可以适当地突出顾拜旦教育哲学的基础和哲学参考。作者将顾拜旦的人类学反思与当代美国实用主义者和哲学家理查德·舒斯特曼的身体美学进行了比较,创造了自己的解释学触发器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coubertin – the philosopher of paideia
This article presents some selected aspects of Pierre de Coubertin’s philosophical anthropology. Coubertin’s philosophy of man is conceived as a philosophy of paideia in the perspective of Werner Jaeger, Pierre Hadot and Michel Foucault thought. The author describes three possible ways of interpreting Coubertin’s thought: doxographical, and creative as well as hermeneutical reconstruction. Next, the possibility of objective criticism of the idealistic vision of Coubertin’s Neo-Olympism is taken into consideration. It is pointed out that the principles of such objective and antydogmatic criticism were established by Immanuel Kant, and it is proposed to use them in the process of critical evaluation of Coubertin’s philosophy. By use of this form of criticism, the foundations and philosophical references of Coubertin’s pedagogical philosophy can be properly highlighted. The author creates her own hermeneutical trigger, comparing Coubertin’s anthropological refl ection with the somaesthetics of the contemporary American pragmatist and philosopher - Richard Shusterman.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信