{"title":"Coubertin – the philosopher of paideia","authors":"M. Zowisło","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.2889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents some selected aspects of Pierre de Coubertin’s philosophical anthropology. Coubertin’s philosophy\nof man is conceived as a philosophy of paideia in the perspective of Werner Jaeger, Pierre Hadot and Michel\nFoucault thought. The author describes three possible ways of interpreting Coubertin’s thought: doxographical,\nand creative as well as hermeneutical reconstruction. Next, the possibility of objective criticism of the idealistic vision\nof Coubertin’s Neo-Olympism is taken into consideration. It is pointed out that the principles of such objective\nand antydogmatic criticism were established by Immanuel Kant, and it is proposed to use them in the process\nof critical evaluation of Coubertin’s philosophy. By use of this form of criticism, the foundations and philosophical\nreferences of Coubertin’s pedagogical philosophy can be properly highlighted. The author creates her own hermeneutical\ntrigger, comparing Coubertin’s anthropological refl ection with the somaesthetics of the contemporary\nAmerican pragmatist and philosopher - Richard Shusterman.\n\n","PeriodicalId":354319,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Sport Humanities","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Sport Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.2889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article presents some selected aspects of Pierre de Coubertin’s philosophical anthropology. Coubertin’s philosophy
of man is conceived as a philosophy of paideia in the perspective of Werner Jaeger, Pierre Hadot and Michel
Foucault thought. The author describes three possible ways of interpreting Coubertin’s thought: doxographical,
and creative as well as hermeneutical reconstruction. Next, the possibility of objective criticism of the idealistic vision
of Coubertin’s Neo-Olympism is taken into consideration. It is pointed out that the principles of such objective
and antydogmatic criticism were established by Immanuel Kant, and it is proposed to use them in the process
of critical evaluation of Coubertin’s philosophy. By use of this form of criticism, the foundations and philosophical
references of Coubertin’s pedagogical philosophy can be properly highlighted. The author creates her own hermeneutical
trigger, comparing Coubertin’s anthropological refl ection with the somaesthetics of the contemporary
American pragmatist and philosopher - Richard Shusterman.