刚性管道与柔性管道的连接:设计与安装-挑战与经验教训

G. Curti, F. Lirola, Gianluigi Pirinu, D. Pavone, F. Perrin
{"title":"刚性管道与柔性管道的连接:设计与安装-挑战与经验教训","authors":"G. Curti, F. Lirola, Gianluigi Pirinu, D. Pavone, F. Perrin","doi":"10.1115/omae2019-95057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the experience made with the engineering and execution of the tie-in of flexible risers to rigid pipelines on a project recently completed in West Africa.\n Five production and injection pipelines (10” and 6”) were tied back to the host platform with flexible risers, in Lazy wave configurations, in ∼600m water depth.\n The risers are directly connected to the terminations structures (PLETs) of the rigid pipelines, through horizontal connection systems.\n The structures forming the tie-in (risers, PLETs and pipelines) have been designed to accommodate axial displacements of the pipelines in the range 0.3m to 1.0m, as positive displacements (expansions) and −0.1m to −0.7m as negative displacements (contractions) of the pipelines, respectively towards and away from the risers, due to pipelines thermal expansions and pipe walking.\n Note that along some of the lines anchoring structures have been installed to control pipe walking.\n The tie-in interface loads were to be limited, in order not to threaten the flexible pipe, the PLETs and the connectors, and, despite the small pipeline end displacements, keeping the interface loads within allowable values, was a challenge.\n The positive displacements were causing interface loads as high as 80% of the allowable values, while the negative displacements were causing up to 90% utilization of the capacity of the connectors and 95% of the allowable loading of the foundations of the PLETs.\n The main drivers of such high loadings are the stiffness of the flexible pipe, combined with the layout of the tie-in.\n Extensive in place analyses were done to simulate the effects of progressive displacements of the pipelines, the pipe-soil interactions and the specifics of the behaviour of the flexible pipes (hysteretic stiffness).\n Full 3D FE analyses of the foundations (mud mats) of the PLETs were done, to circumvent the limitations of a classical bearing capacity analysis approach.\n As built information were also used, to remove some conservatisms in the assumptions initially taken in the design. A special installation procedure was implemented, to achieve a layout of the riser at the approach of the pipeline capable to better relieve the displacements of the pipelines and reduce interface loads.\n Feedbacks from the installation are given in the paper.\n The lessons learned are also presented: a “flexible” pipe is a “stiff” structure and a direct tie-in to the pipeline may become an issue, if not addressed early enough during the execution of the project, when it can be too late to add mitigation structures, like intermediate tie-in spools, or to change significantly the routing of the risers and pipelines.","PeriodicalId":190268,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5A: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tie-in of a Rigid Pipeline to a Flexible Rise: Design and Installation — Challenges and Lessons Learnt\",\"authors\":\"G. Curti, F. Lirola, Gianluigi Pirinu, D. Pavone, F. Perrin\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/omae2019-95057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents the experience made with the engineering and execution of the tie-in of flexible risers to rigid pipelines on a project recently completed in West Africa.\\n Five production and injection pipelines (10” and 6”) were tied back to the host platform with flexible risers, in Lazy wave configurations, in ∼600m water depth.\\n The risers are directly connected to the terminations structures (PLETs) of the rigid pipelines, through horizontal connection systems.\\n The structures forming the tie-in (risers, PLETs and pipelines) have been designed to accommodate axial displacements of the pipelines in the range 0.3m to 1.0m, as positive displacements (expansions) and −0.1m to −0.7m as negative displacements (contractions) of the pipelines, respectively towards and away from the risers, due to pipelines thermal expansions and pipe walking.\\n Note that along some of the lines anchoring structures have been installed to control pipe walking.\\n The tie-in interface loads were to be limited, in order not to threaten the flexible pipe, the PLETs and the connectors, and, despite the small pipeline end displacements, keeping the interface loads within allowable values, was a challenge.\\n The positive displacements were causing interface loads as high as 80% of the allowable values, while the negative displacements were causing up to 90% utilization of the capacity of the connectors and 95% of the allowable loading of the foundations of the PLETs.\\n The main drivers of such high loadings are the stiffness of the flexible pipe, combined with the layout of the tie-in.\\n Extensive in place analyses were done to simulate the effects of progressive displacements of the pipelines, the pipe-soil interactions and the specifics of the behaviour of the flexible pipes (hysteretic stiffness).\\n Full 3D FE analyses of the foundations (mud mats) of the PLETs were done, to circumvent the limitations of a classical bearing capacity analysis approach.\\n As built information were also used, to remove some conservatisms in the assumptions initially taken in the design. A special installation procedure was implemented, to achieve a layout of the riser at the approach of the pipeline capable to better relieve the displacements of the pipelines and reduce interface loads.\\n Feedbacks from the installation are given in the paper.\\n The lessons learned are also presented: a “flexible” pipe is a “stiff” structure and a direct tie-in to the pipeline may become an issue, if not addressed early enough during the execution of the project, when it can be too late to add mitigation structures, like intermediate tie-in spools, or to change significantly the routing of the risers and pipelines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":190268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 5A: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 5A: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-95057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5A: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-95057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了最近在西非完成的一个项目中,柔性立管与刚性管道连接的工程和执行经验。5条生产和注入管道(10”和6”)通过柔性立管连接回主机平台,在水深约600m处采用Lazy wave配置。立管通过水平连接系统直接连接到刚性管道的终端结构(et)上。由于管道热膨胀和管道行走,形成接头的结构(立管、小管和管道)被设计成分别适应管道在0.3m至1.0m范围内的正位移(膨胀)和- 0.1m至- 0.7m的负位移(收缩),分别朝向和远离立管。请注意,在一些管线上安装了锚定结构来控制管道行走。为了不威胁到柔性管道、接头和接头,接头界面载荷必须得到限制,而且,尽管管道末端位移很小,但要将界面载荷保持在允许值内是一项挑战。正位移导致接口载荷高达允许值的80%,而负位移导致高达90%的连接器容量利用率和95%的连体基础允许载荷。这种高载荷的主要驱动因素是柔性管的刚度以及接头的布置。进行了广泛的现场分析,以模拟管道的渐进位移、管道-土壤相互作用和柔性管道的具体行为(滞回刚度)的影响。为了避免传统的承载力分析方法的局限性,对连体地基(泥地)进行了全三维有限元分析。由于还使用了建筑信息,以消除最初在设计中采取的假设中的一些保守主义。为了实现立管在管道靠近处的布局,能够更好地减轻管道的位移并减少界面载荷,采用了特殊的安装程序。文中给出了安装后的反馈。还介绍了吸取的经验教训:“柔性”管道是一种“刚性”结构,如果在项目执行过程中不及早解决,与管道的直接连接可能会成为一个问题,届时,增加中间连接线轴等缓解结构或大幅改变立管和管道的路由可能为时已晚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tie-in of a Rigid Pipeline to a Flexible Rise: Design and Installation — Challenges and Lessons Learnt
This paper presents the experience made with the engineering and execution of the tie-in of flexible risers to rigid pipelines on a project recently completed in West Africa. Five production and injection pipelines (10” and 6”) were tied back to the host platform with flexible risers, in Lazy wave configurations, in ∼600m water depth. The risers are directly connected to the terminations structures (PLETs) of the rigid pipelines, through horizontal connection systems. The structures forming the tie-in (risers, PLETs and pipelines) have been designed to accommodate axial displacements of the pipelines in the range 0.3m to 1.0m, as positive displacements (expansions) and −0.1m to −0.7m as negative displacements (contractions) of the pipelines, respectively towards and away from the risers, due to pipelines thermal expansions and pipe walking. Note that along some of the lines anchoring structures have been installed to control pipe walking. The tie-in interface loads were to be limited, in order not to threaten the flexible pipe, the PLETs and the connectors, and, despite the small pipeline end displacements, keeping the interface loads within allowable values, was a challenge. The positive displacements were causing interface loads as high as 80% of the allowable values, while the negative displacements were causing up to 90% utilization of the capacity of the connectors and 95% of the allowable loading of the foundations of the PLETs. The main drivers of such high loadings are the stiffness of the flexible pipe, combined with the layout of the tie-in. Extensive in place analyses were done to simulate the effects of progressive displacements of the pipelines, the pipe-soil interactions and the specifics of the behaviour of the flexible pipes (hysteretic stiffness). Full 3D FE analyses of the foundations (mud mats) of the PLETs were done, to circumvent the limitations of a classical bearing capacity analysis approach. As built information were also used, to remove some conservatisms in the assumptions initially taken in the design. A special installation procedure was implemented, to achieve a layout of the riser at the approach of the pipeline capable to better relieve the displacements of the pipelines and reduce interface loads. Feedbacks from the installation are given in the paper. The lessons learned are also presented: a “flexible” pipe is a “stiff” structure and a direct tie-in to the pipeline may become an issue, if not addressed early enough during the execution of the project, when it can be too late to add mitigation structures, like intermediate tie-in spools, or to change significantly the routing of the risers and pipelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信