{"title":"不同骨错牙合类型患者髁突位置的头颅测量评估","authors":"P. Poudel, S. Dahal","doi":"10.3126/jnprossoc.v6i1.58350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There are variations in growth and orientation of cranial base region where the maxilla and mandible articulate. This leads to differential movement of the maxilla and mandible causing changes in glenoid fossa and condylar position. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the condylar position in patients with different skeletal sagittal malocclusion patterns.\nMethods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 165 individuals, having skeletal Class I, Class II and Class III relationship (55 in each group) selected by convenience sampling method after receiving ethical approval and informed consent. Lateral cephalograms were taken and measurements for determining condylar position were done and compared among three groups. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 16. Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to determine the mean difference in between condylar positions of three skeletal malocclusion patterns and Mann-Whitney U test was done for their pairwise comparison.\nResults: There was no significant difference in posterior cranial base length (P=0.200) and saddle angle (P=0.517) in three skeletal malocclusion class groups. However, the three malocclusion patterns showed significant differences in gonian angle (P=0.001) and articular angle (P=0.013). Significant moderate negative correlation in saddle angle and articular angle (P<0.001) was observed.\nConclusion: The findings of this study concluded that condylar position based on posterior cranial base length was not associated with different skeletal malocclusion patterns. However, articular angle was significantly lower in skeletal class III than in class II.","PeriodicalId":247304,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cephalometric Assessment of Condylar Position among Individuals with Different Skeletal Malocclusion Patterns\",\"authors\":\"P. Poudel, S. Dahal\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/jnprossoc.v6i1.58350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: There are variations in growth and orientation of cranial base region where the maxilla and mandible articulate. This leads to differential movement of the maxilla and mandible causing changes in glenoid fossa and condylar position. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the condylar position in patients with different skeletal sagittal malocclusion patterns.\\nMethods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 165 individuals, having skeletal Class I, Class II and Class III relationship (55 in each group) selected by convenience sampling method after receiving ethical approval and informed consent. Lateral cephalograms were taken and measurements for determining condylar position were done and compared among three groups. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 16. Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to determine the mean difference in between condylar positions of three skeletal malocclusion patterns and Mann-Whitney U test was done for their pairwise comparison.\\nResults: There was no significant difference in posterior cranial base length (P=0.200) and saddle angle (P=0.517) in three skeletal malocclusion class groups. However, the three malocclusion patterns showed significant differences in gonian angle (P=0.001) and articular angle (P=0.013). Significant moderate negative correlation in saddle angle and articular angle (P<0.001) was observed.\\nConclusion: The findings of this study concluded that condylar position based on posterior cranial base length was not associated with different skeletal malocclusion patterns. However, articular angle was significantly lower in skeletal class III than in class II.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/jnprossoc.v6i1.58350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jnprossoc.v6i1.58350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在上颌和下颌骨连接的颅底区有不同的生长和方向。这导致上颌骨和下颌骨的不同运动,导致关节窝和髁突位置的变化。因此,本研究旨在确定不同骨矢状位错患者的髁突位置。方法:经伦理批准和知情同意后,采用方便抽样的方法,对165名ⅰ类、ⅱ类和ⅲ类骨性关系个体(每组55人)进行分析性横断面研究。采用侧位头颅造影,测量髁突位置,并对三组进行比较。数据采用SPSS version 16进行分析。采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验确定三种骨骼错颌的髁突位置的平均差值,两两比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:3个骨错类组后颅底长度(P=0.200)和鞍角(P=0.517)差异无统计学意义。然而,三种错牙合类型在牙周角(P=0.001)和关节角(P=0.013)上存在显著差异。鞍角与关节角呈中度负相关(P<0.001)。结论:本研究的结果表明,基于后颅底长度的髁突位置与不同的骨骼错颌模式无关。然而,骨骼III类的关节角明显低于II类。
Cephalometric Assessment of Condylar Position among Individuals with Different Skeletal Malocclusion Patterns
Introduction: There are variations in growth and orientation of cranial base region where the maxilla and mandible articulate. This leads to differential movement of the maxilla and mandible causing changes in glenoid fossa and condylar position. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the condylar position in patients with different skeletal sagittal malocclusion patterns.
Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 165 individuals, having skeletal Class I, Class II and Class III relationship (55 in each group) selected by convenience sampling method after receiving ethical approval and informed consent. Lateral cephalograms were taken and measurements for determining condylar position were done and compared among three groups. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 16. Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to determine the mean difference in between condylar positions of three skeletal malocclusion patterns and Mann-Whitney U test was done for their pairwise comparison.
Results: There was no significant difference in posterior cranial base length (P=0.200) and saddle angle (P=0.517) in three skeletal malocclusion class groups. However, the three malocclusion patterns showed significant differences in gonian angle (P=0.001) and articular angle (P=0.013). Significant moderate negative correlation in saddle angle and articular angle (P<0.001) was observed.
Conclusion: The findings of this study concluded that condylar position based on posterior cranial base length was not associated with different skeletal malocclusion patterns. However, articular angle was significantly lower in skeletal class III than in class II.