{"title":"青年男子游泳运动员水下起跳阶段的运动学分析","authors":"Łukasz Wądrzyk, Robert Staszkiewicz","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.7797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The introduction of a starting block with an adjustable and slanted footrest has caused the development of a new starting technique - the Kick Start. Therefore, research on swim start seems necessary, particularly concerning the Kick Start underwater phase. Aim: The study aim was to characterise the underwater phase of the Kick Start among young, male, competitive swimmers. Basic procedures. The study included 32 male, youth, competitive swimmers (mean age=16.61 years, height=1.80 m, body mass=72.47 kg, FINA Points=617). Participants executed three freestyle Kick Starts recorded using an underwater high-speed camera. Videos were kinematically analysed using the Skill Spector programme. Then, k-means clustering was applied. Results. Participants were classified into three clusters. Cluster FT (“flat trajectory”) comprised swimmers with a ”flat” course of underwater movement - low value of the angle of water attack (KA=0.92o), maximum depth of the head (hmax=0.85 m), distance (dmax=0.71 m), and time to maximum depth of the head (tmax=0.51 s). Group MT (“moderate trajectory”) had moderate values of the above-mentioned parameters (KA=10.27o, hmax=0.93 m, dmax=1.03 m, tmax=0.60 s), while Cluster DT (“deep trajectory”) achieved the highest values (KA=15.74o, hmax=1.05 m, dmax=1.38 m, tmax=0.73 s). The time to reach 15 m in Cluster FT was about 0.3 s slower than in Group MT and DT, although this dissimilarity was not significant. Conclusions. The course of underwater movement is mostly affected by the angle at which swimmers submerge. There is no “ideal” way to perform the underwater phase, however, it should not be executed too close to the water surface.\n\n","PeriodicalId":223482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinematic Analysis of the Kick Start Underwater Phase of Young Male Swimmers\",\"authors\":\"Łukasz Wądrzyk, Robert Staszkiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0013.7797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The introduction of a starting block with an adjustable and slanted footrest has caused the development of a new starting technique - the Kick Start. Therefore, research on swim start seems necessary, particularly concerning the Kick Start underwater phase. Aim: The study aim was to characterise the underwater phase of the Kick Start among young, male, competitive swimmers. Basic procedures. The study included 32 male, youth, competitive swimmers (mean age=16.61 years, height=1.80 m, body mass=72.47 kg, FINA Points=617). Participants executed three freestyle Kick Starts recorded using an underwater high-speed camera. Videos were kinematically analysed using the Skill Spector programme. Then, k-means clustering was applied. Results. Participants were classified into three clusters. Cluster FT (“flat trajectory”) comprised swimmers with a ”flat” course of underwater movement - low value of the angle of water attack (KA=0.92o), maximum depth of the head (hmax=0.85 m), distance (dmax=0.71 m), and time to maximum depth of the head (tmax=0.51 s). Group MT (“moderate trajectory”) had moderate values of the above-mentioned parameters (KA=10.27o, hmax=0.93 m, dmax=1.03 m, tmax=0.60 s), while Cluster DT (“deep trajectory”) achieved the highest values (KA=15.74o, hmax=1.05 m, dmax=1.38 m, tmax=0.73 s). The time to reach 15 m in Cluster FT was about 0.3 s slower than in Group MT and DT, although this dissimilarity was not significant. Conclusions. The course of underwater movement is mostly affected by the angle at which swimmers submerge. There is no “ideal” way to perform the underwater phase, however, it should not be executed too close to the water surface.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":223482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.7797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.7797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍:一个可调节和倾斜脚踏板的起跑块的引入引起了一种新的起跑技术的发展-踢腿起跑。因此,对游泳启动的研究显得十分必要,特别是对水下启动阶段的研究。目的:这项研究的目的是描述年轻男性竞技游泳运动员的起跑水下阶段。基本的程序。该研究包括32名男性,青年,竞技游泳运动员(平均年龄=16.61岁,身高=1.80米,体重=72.47公斤,国际泳联积分=617)。参与者用水下高速摄像机记录了三次自由式踢腿动作。使用技能专家程序对视频进行运动学分析。然后应用k-means聚类。结果。参与者被分为三组。群FT(“平坦轨迹”)由水下运动过程“平坦”的游泳者组成,其中攻水角(KA= 0.20)、最大头部深度(hmax=0.85 m)、距离(dmax=0.71 m)和到达最大头部深度的时间(tmax=0.51 s)值较低,MT(“中等轨迹”)组上述参数值适中(KA=10.27o, hmax=0.93 m, dmax=1.03 m, tmax=0.60 s),而群DT(“深度轨迹”)组的上述参数值最高(KA=15.74o, hmax=1.05 m,dmax=1.38 m, tmax=0.73 s), FT组到达15 m的时间比MT组和DT组慢0.3 s左右,但差异不显著。结论。水下运动的过程主要受游泳者潜水角度的影响。没有“理想”的方式来执行水下阶段,但是,它不应该太接近水面执行。
Kinematic Analysis of the Kick Start Underwater Phase of Young Male Swimmers
Introduction: The introduction of a starting block with an adjustable and slanted footrest has caused the development of a new starting technique - the Kick Start. Therefore, research on swim start seems necessary, particularly concerning the Kick Start underwater phase. Aim: The study aim was to characterise the underwater phase of the Kick Start among young, male, competitive swimmers. Basic procedures. The study included 32 male, youth, competitive swimmers (mean age=16.61 years, height=1.80 m, body mass=72.47 kg, FINA Points=617). Participants executed three freestyle Kick Starts recorded using an underwater high-speed camera. Videos were kinematically analysed using the Skill Spector programme. Then, k-means clustering was applied. Results. Participants were classified into three clusters. Cluster FT (“flat trajectory”) comprised swimmers with a ”flat” course of underwater movement - low value of the angle of water attack (KA=0.92o), maximum depth of the head (hmax=0.85 m), distance (dmax=0.71 m), and time to maximum depth of the head (tmax=0.51 s). Group MT (“moderate trajectory”) had moderate values of the above-mentioned parameters (KA=10.27o, hmax=0.93 m, dmax=1.03 m, tmax=0.60 s), while Cluster DT (“deep trajectory”) achieved the highest values (KA=15.74o, hmax=1.05 m, dmax=1.38 m, tmax=0.73 s). The time to reach 15 m in Cluster FT was about 0.3 s slower than in Group MT and DT, although this dissimilarity was not significant. Conclusions. The course of underwater movement is mostly affected by the angle at which swimmers submerge. There is no “ideal” way to perform the underwater phase, however, it should not be executed too close to the water surface.