指针类型的抽象公理

S. Meldal
{"title":"指针类型的抽象公理","authors":"S. Meldal","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.1989.47999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pointer ('reference' or 'access') types are extremely useful in programming, but are usually considered rather intractable in the context of formal verification. The author deals with this problem using the concept of collections and access types. He gives two examples of how this can be done. One approach, using the axiomatic method of J.V. Guttag and V. Horning (1978), is too specific, resulting in distinct semantics of program constructs that would be considered equivalent in most programming languages. The problem is addressed in a second axiomatization method, which reduces the expressiveness of the annotation language by reducing the number of operators on access values. A reinterpretation of the allocation operator in the programming language then gives the desired proof strength, but with a higher level of abstraction than in the standard formalization. Verification of a package defining a set type is given as an example.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":325958,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An abstract axiomatization of pointer types\",\"authors\":\"S. Meldal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.1989.47999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pointer ('reference' or 'access') types are extremely useful in programming, but are usually considered rather intractable in the context of formal verification. The author deals with this problem using the concept of collections and access types. He gives two examples of how this can be done. One approach, using the axiomatic method of J.V. Guttag and V. Horning (1978), is too specific, resulting in distinct semantics of program constructs that would be considered equivalent in most programming languages. The problem is addressed in a second axiomatization method, which reduces the expressiveness of the annotation language by reducing the number of operators on access values. A reinterpretation of the allocation operator in the programming language then gives the desired proof strength, but with a higher level of abstraction than in the standard formalization. Verification of a package defining a set type is given as an example.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":325958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.47999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.47999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

指针('引用'或'访问')类型在编程中非常有用,但在形式验证的上下文中通常被认为相当棘手。作者使用集合和访问类型的概念来处理这个问题。他举了两个例子来说明如何做到这一点。一种方法,使用J.V. Guttag和v.h orning(1978)的公理方法,过于具体,导致程序结构的不同语义在大多数编程语言中被认为是等价的。第二个公理化方法解决了这个问题,该方法通过减少访问值上的操作符数量来降低注释语言的表达性。然后在编程语言中重新解释分配运算符,从而获得所需的证明强度,但具有比标准形式化更高的抽象级别。给出了一个定义set类型的包的验证示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An abstract axiomatization of pointer types
Pointer ('reference' or 'access') types are extremely useful in programming, but are usually considered rather intractable in the context of formal verification. The author deals with this problem using the concept of collections and access types. He gives two examples of how this can be done. One approach, using the axiomatic method of J.V. Guttag and V. Horning (1978), is too specific, resulting in distinct semantics of program constructs that would be considered equivalent in most programming languages. The problem is addressed in a second axiomatization method, which reduces the expressiveness of the annotation language by reducing the number of operators on access values. A reinterpretation of the allocation operator in the programming language then gives the desired proof strength, but with a higher level of abstraction than in the standard formalization. Verification of a package defining a set type is given as an example.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信