2014年计算机科学教育创新与技术会议工作组报告论文集

A. Clear, R. Lister
{"title":"2014年计算机科学教育创新与技术会议工作组报告论文集","authors":"A. Clear, R. Lister","doi":"10.1145/2713609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Each year, the ITiCSE conference Call for Participation (CFP) includes a call for working group proposals, which are a unique opportunity for computing educators, from different countries, to come together and collaborate on a topic of common interest. For ITiCSE 2014, the CFP invited any intending group leader(s) to submit a two-page proposal. Those proposals are evaluated by the working group coordinators, on the basis of likely interest in the suggested topic and the qualifications of the intending leaders. This year, seven applications were received, and four of those proposals were accepted. \n \nApproximately one month after the conference, three of the working groups submitted reports for refereeing. Each of three working group reports were evaluated by at least two referees, and also the two working group coordinators. On the basis of this refereeing process, all three working group reports that follow were accepted (with revisions) for publication. \n \nAs ITiCSE 2014 approached, we had some working group members indicate that they would not be attending the conference, but they wanted to remain members of their group. As per the philosophy of the ITiCSE conferences and the direction of SIGCSE we did not agree to those people remaining members. For the ITiCSE conference when people propose a working group, or apply to join a group, it must be with the intention of coming to the conference -- especially people who propose to lead a group. Intrinsic to any conference is the concept of meeting face to face. \n \nThe concept of an ITiCSE working group has evolved, and there is now a great deal of tacit knowledge on how these groups are run, managed, and coordinated. We would like to recommend for future ITiCSE Working Groups that people who propose to lead working groups should have at least one of the leaders with prior experience as a working group member.","PeriodicalId":162845,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference\",\"authors\":\"A. Clear, R. Lister\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2713609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Each year, the ITiCSE conference Call for Participation (CFP) includes a call for working group proposals, which are a unique opportunity for computing educators, from different countries, to come together and collaborate on a topic of common interest. For ITiCSE 2014, the CFP invited any intending group leader(s) to submit a two-page proposal. Those proposals are evaluated by the working group coordinators, on the basis of likely interest in the suggested topic and the qualifications of the intending leaders. This year, seven applications were received, and four of those proposals were accepted. \\n \\nApproximately one month after the conference, three of the working groups submitted reports for refereeing. Each of three working group reports were evaluated by at least two referees, and also the two working group coordinators. On the basis of this refereeing process, all three working group reports that follow were accepted (with revisions) for publication. \\n \\nAs ITiCSE 2014 approached, we had some working group members indicate that they would not be attending the conference, but they wanted to remain members of their group. As per the philosophy of the ITiCSE conferences and the direction of SIGCSE we did not agree to those people remaining members. For the ITiCSE conference when people propose a working group, or apply to join a group, it must be with the intention of coming to the conference -- especially people who propose to lead a group. Intrinsic to any conference is the concept of meeting face to face. \\n \\nThe concept of an ITiCSE working group has evolved, and there is now a great deal of tacit knowledge on how these groups are run, managed, and coordinated. We would like to recommend for future ITiCSE Working Groups that people who propose to lead working groups should have at least one of the leaders with prior experience as a working group member.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2713609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2713609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

每年,icticse会议邀请参与(CFP)包括一个工作组提案的邀请,这是一个独特的机会,让来自不同国家的计算机教育工作者聚集在一起,就共同感兴趣的主题进行合作。对于ITiCSE 2014, CFP邀请任何有意向的小组领导提交一份两页的提案。这些提案由工作组协调员根据对所建议专题的可能兴趣和拟担任领导人的资格加以评价。今年共收到七份申请,其中四份获接纳。会议大约一个月后,三个工作组提交了报告供评审。三个工作组的每一份报告都由至少两名裁判员和两名工作组协调员进行评价。在此评审过程的基础上,随后的所有三个工作组报告都被接受(并进行了修订)以供出版。随着ITiCSE 2014的临近,我们有一些工作组成员表示他们不会参加会议,但他们希望继续成为他们小组的成员。根据ITiCSE会议的理念和SIGCSE的方向,我们不同意这些人继续成为成员。对于ITiCSE会议来说,当人们提议成立一个工作组,或者申请加入一个小组时,必须是带着来参加会议的意图——尤其是提议领导一个小组的人。任何会议的本质都是面对面的会议。ITiCSE工作组的概念已经发展,现在有大量关于如何运行、管理和协调这些工作组的隐性知识。对于未来的ITiCSE工作组,我们建议提议领导工作组的人至少应该有一位具有工作组成员经验的领导者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference
Each year, the ITiCSE conference Call for Participation (CFP) includes a call for working group proposals, which are a unique opportunity for computing educators, from different countries, to come together and collaborate on a topic of common interest. For ITiCSE 2014, the CFP invited any intending group leader(s) to submit a two-page proposal. Those proposals are evaluated by the working group coordinators, on the basis of likely interest in the suggested topic and the qualifications of the intending leaders. This year, seven applications were received, and four of those proposals were accepted. Approximately one month after the conference, three of the working groups submitted reports for refereeing. Each of three working group reports were evaluated by at least two referees, and also the two working group coordinators. On the basis of this refereeing process, all three working group reports that follow were accepted (with revisions) for publication. As ITiCSE 2014 approached, we had some working group members indicate that they would not be attending the conference, but they wanted to remain members of their group. As per the philosophy of the ITiCSE conferences and the direction of SIGCSE we did not agree to those people remaining members. For the ITiCSE conference when people propose a working group, or apply to join a group, it must be with the intention of coming to the conference -- especially people who propose to lead a group. Intrinsic to any conference is the concept of meeting face to face. The concept of an ITiCSE working group has evolved, and there is now a great deal of tacit knowledge on how these groups are run, managed, and coordinated. We would like to recommend for future ITiCSE Working Groups that people who propose to lead working groups should have at least one of the leaders with prior experience as a working group member.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信