{"title":"“半球训练”:美洲大众资讯计划的心理自我输出","authors":"R. Aitken","doi":"10.7560/ic54303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the Inter-American Popular Information Program (IIP), a midcentury attempt to apply a set of psychological techniques in mass communication practices oriented to poor and \"illiterate\" populations in Central and South America. I argue that this program offers an instructive contrast to conventional accounts of social reconstruction and of the history of the \"social\" as an analytical category. These conventional accounts often frame postwar order narrowly as a grand political-economic compromise in which the \"social\" is conflated with the space of domestic social stability or a reified national space. The case of the IIP, however, emphasizes the multiplicity of ways—and geographies—in which the \"social purpose\" of world order was imagined especially in colonial and postcolonial settings. For the IIP, \"social stability\" was not to be achieved through the language of social security or domestic intervention but through the construction of a particular kind of homology between self and a world order, the construction of psychological selves \"fit\" for the requirements of a new internationalizing world order. Drawing upon archival records, this article argues for the importance of more complex and diverse accounts of postwar order and the social purposes in which it was implicated.","PeriodicalId":328867,"journal":{"name":"Information & Culture: A Journal of History","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Hemisphere Training\\\": Exporting the Psychological Self at the Inter-American Popular Information Program\",\"authors\":\"R. Aitken\",\"doi\":\"10.7560/ic54303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article examines the Inter-American Popular Information Program (IIP), a midcentury attempt to apply a set of psychological techniques in mass communication practices oriented to poor and \\\"illiterate\\\" populations in Central and South America. I argue that this program offers an instructive contrast to conventional accounts of social reconstruction and of the history of the \\\"social\\\" as an analytical category. These conventional accounts often frame postwar order narrowly as a grand political-economic compromise in which the \\\"social\\\" is conflated with the space of domestic social stability or a reified national space. The case of the IIP, however, emphasizes the multiplicity of ways—and geographies—in which the \\\"social purpose\\\" of world order was imagined especially in colonial and postcolonial settings. For the IIP, \\\"social stability\\\" was not to be achieved through the language of social security or domestic intervention but through the construction of a particular kind of homology between self and a world order, the construction of psychological selves \\\"fit\\\" for the requirements of a new internationalizing world order. Drawing upon archival records, this article argues for the importance of more complex and diverse accounts of postwar order and the social purposes in which it was implicated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information & Culture: A Journal of History\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information & Culture: A Journal of History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7560/ic54303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Culture: A Journal of History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/ic54303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
摘要:本文考察了美洲大众信息计划(Inter-American Popular Information Program, IIP),这是一项世纪中叶的尝试,旨在将一套心理学技术应用于面向中南美洲贫困和“文盲”人口的大众传播实践。我认为,这个计划提供了一个有益的对比,传统的社会重建和历史的“社会”作为一个分析范畴。这些传统的描述通常将战后秩序狭隘地框定为一种宏大的政治经济妥协,其中“社会”与国内社会稳定的空间或具体化的国家空间混为一谈。然而,IIP的案例强调了世界秩序的“社会目的”被想象的方式和地理的多样性,尤其是在殖民和后殖民的背景下。对于IIP来说,“社会稳定”不是通过社会安全或国内干预的语言来实现的,而是通过在自我和世界秩序之间构建一种特殊的同源性,即“适合”新的国际化世界秩序要求的心理自我的构建。本文以档案记录为依据,论证了对战后秩序及其所涉及的社会目的进行更复杂、更多样化描述的重要性。
"Hemisphere Training": Exporting the Psychological Self at the Inter-American Popular Information Program
Abstract:This article examines the Inter-American Popular Information Program (IIP), a midcentury attempt to apply a set of psychological techniques in mass communication practices oriented to poor and "illiterate" populations in Central and South America. I argue that this program offers an instructive contrast to conventional accounts of social reconstruction and of the history of the "social" as an analytical category. These conventional accounts often frame postwar order narrowly as a grand political-economic compromise in which the "social" is conflated with the space of domestic social stability or a reified national space. The case of the IIP, however, emphasizes the multiplicity of ways—and geographies—in which the "social purpose" of world order was imagined especially in colonial and postcolonial settings. For the IIP, "social stability" was not to be achieved through the language of social security or domestic intervention but through the construction of a particular kind of homology between self and a world order, the construction of psychological selves "fit" for the requirements of a new internationalizing world order. Drawing upon archival records, this article argues for the importance of more complex and diverse accounts of postwar order and the social purposes in which it was implicated.