{"title":"考虑天线间隙宽度的两种馈电模型的比较","authors":"P. Du, W. Fu","doi":"10.1109/APCAP.2018.8538077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The enhanced gap source model and the finite-width feed model are two accurate feed models considering the width of the feed gap in the antenna modeling. These two models are easy to implement. Comparing with the former model, finer meshes are required in the latter one, which leads to more unknowns. These two models are compared to study how to choose the feed model.","PeriodicalId":198124,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Feed Models Considering Gap Width for Antennas\",\"authors\":\"P. Du, W. Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APCAP.2018.8538077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The enhanced gap source model and the finite-width feed model are two accurate feed models considering the width of the feed gap in the antenna modeling. These two models are easy to implement. Comparing with the former model, finer meshes are required in the latter one, which leads to more unknowns. These two models are compared to study how to choose the feed model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APCAP.2018.8538077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APCAP.2018.8538077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Two Feed Models Considering Gap Width for Antennas
The enhanced gap source model and the finite-width feed model are two accurate feed models considering the width of the feed gap in the antenna modeling. These two models are easy to implement. Comparing with the former model, finer meshes are required in the latter one, which leads to more unknowns. These two models are compared to study how to choose the feed model.