{"title":"一个错误归属的问题:当代小说中的女性艺术与女性主义艺术史","authors":"J. Clayton","doi":"10.51427/com.jcs.2022.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper explores three works of fiction — Elizabeth Kostova’s The Swan Thieves (2010), Siri Hustvedt’s The Blazing World (2014) and Jessie Burton’s The Muse (2016) — all of which attempt to answer the question “why have there been no great women artists?” by exploring the possibility that artworks by women may have been misattributed to their male contemporaries. It is suggested that authors of art-fiction often draw on the work of feminist art historians not only to show how such misattribution might occur, but also how it might be consolidated and perpetuated via the international mechanisms which govern the circulation of art, thus relegat-ing female artists from the status of practitioner to muse. In exploring how the reception of an artwork can be influenced by viewers’ perceptions about the artist’s gender, fiction about women’s art also contributes to the debate over whether it is possible to identify a distinctive feminine aesthetic. Whilst suggesting that art-history novels often defer to a traditional hierarchy of art forms, in which oil paintings of mythological subjects carry the greatest pres-tige, this paper argues that art-fiction can also create an alternative narrative of art history which can be used to challenge or at least supplement the mainstream narrative in which great artworks are almost exclusively produced by men. qual as grandes obras de arte são quase exclusivamente produzidas por homens.","PeriodicalId":171699,"journal":{"name":"Compendium : Journal of Comparative Studies = Revista de Estudos Comparatistas","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Question of Misattribution: Women’s Art & Feminist Art History in Contemporary Fiction\",\"authors\":\"J. Clayton\",\"doi\":\"10.51427/com.jcs.2022.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This paper explores three works of fiction — Elizabeth Kostova’s The Swan Thieves (2010), Siri Hustvedt’s The Blazing World (2014) and Jessie Burton’s The Muse (2016) — all of which attempt to answer the question “why have there been no great women artists?” by exploring the possibility that artworks by women may have been misattributed to their male contemporaries. It is suggested that authors of art-fiction often draw on the work of feminist art historians not only to show how such misattribution might occur, but also how it might be consolidated and perpetuated via the international mechanisms which govern the circulation of art, thus relegat-ing female artists from the status of practitioner to muse. In exploring how the reception of an artwork can be influenced by viewers’ perceptions about the artist’s gender, fiction about women’s art also contributes to the debate over whether it is possible to identify a distinctive feminine aesthetic. Whilst suggesting that art-history novels often defer to a traditional hierarchy of art forms, in which oil paintings of mythological subjects carry the greatest pres-tige, this paper argues that art-fiction can also create an alternative narrative of art history which can be used to challenge or at least supplement the mainstream narrative in which great artworks are almost exclusively produced by men. qual as grandes obras de arte são quase exclusivamente produzidas por homens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compendium : Journal of Comparative Studies = Revista de Estudos Comparatistas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compendium : Journal of Comparative Studies = Revista de Estudos Comparatistas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51427/com.jcs.2022.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium : Journal of Comparative Studies = Revista de Estudos Comparatistas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51427/com.jcs.2022.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了伊丽莎白·科斯托娃的《偷天鹅贼》(2010)、Siri Hustvedt的《燃烧的世界》(2014)和Jessie Burton的《缪斯》(2016)这三部小说,它们都试图回答“为什么没有伟大的女性艺术家?”通过探索女性作品可能被误认为是同时代男性作品的可能性。有人建议,艺术小说的作者经常借鉴女权主义艺术史学家的作品,这不仅是为了展示这种错误归属是如何发生的,而且也是为了展示这种错误归属是如何通过管理艺术流通的国际机制得到巩固和延续的,从而将女性艺术家从实践者的地位降至缪斯的地位。在探索艺术作品的接受如何受到观众对艺术家性别的看法的影响时,关于女性艺术的小说也有助于争论是否有可能确定一种独特的女性美学。虽然艺术史小说通常遵循传统的艺术形式等级,其中神话题材的油画具有最大的声望,但本文认为,艺术小说也可以创造一种艺术史的替代叙事,可以用来挑战或至少补充主流叙事,在主流叙事中,伟大的艺术品几乎完全由男性创作。与大obras de arte s相同,也与quase exclusivente produczidas穷人相同。
A Question of Misattribution: Women’s Art & Feminist Art History in Contemporary Fiction
: This paper explores three works of fiction — Elizabeth Kostova’s The Swan Thieves (2010), Siri Hustvedt’s The Blazing World (2014) and Jessie Burton’s The Muse (2016) — all of which attempt to answer the question “why have there been no great women artists?” by exploring the possibility that artworks by women may have been misattributed to their male contemporaries. It is suggested that authors of art-fiction often draw on the work of feminist art historians not only to show how such misattribution might occur, but also how it might be consolidated and perpetuated via the international mechanisms which govern the circulation of art, thus relegat-ing female artists from the status of practitioner to muse. In exploring how the reception of an artwork can be influenced by viewers’ perceptions about the artist’s gender, fiction about women’s art also contributes to the debate over whether it is possible to identify a distinctive feminine aesthetic. Whilst suggesting that art-history novels often defer to a traditional hierarchy of art forms, in which oil paintings of mythological subjects carry the greatest pres-tige, this paper argues that art-fiction can also create an alternative narrative of art history which can be used to challenge or at least supplement the mainstream narrative in which great artworks are almost exclusively produced by men. qual as grandes obras de arte são quase exclusivamente produzidas por homens.