总纵向应变和总周向应变对心衰回声评分的影响作为充血性心力衰竭合并左心室收缩功能障碍患者60天再入院预测指标

A. Muzakkir, Muzakkir Amir, P. Kabo, K. Saleh, Burhanuddin Bahar, A. F. Ghaznawie, F. A. Tandean, Idar Mappangara
{"title":"总纵向应变和总周向应变对心衰回声评分的影响作为充血性心力衰竭合并左心室收缩功能障碍患者60天再入院预测指标","authors":"A. Muzakkir, Muzakkir Amir, P. Kabo, K. Saleh, Burhanuddin Bahar, A. F. Ghaznawie, F. A. Tandean, Idar Mappangara","doi":"10.20956/nmsj.v6i1.14674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The readmission rate due to heart failure increases every year in South Sulawesi. A Frequently used method for assessing readmission is an echocardiographic examination by measuring ejection fraction. However, recent studies show that the speckle tracking parameters are more sensitive to predict readmission of heart failure patients. In this study, we assess the role of Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) and Global Circumferential Strain (GCS) parameters on the Echo Heart Failure Score (EHFS) as a 60-days readmission predictor in heart failure patients. Methods: We included 175 patients admitted through the inpatient installation of Integrated Heart Center Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo General Hospital. In addition, we reviewed up to 60 days after outpatient prospectively by collecting data through medical records. The correlation between echocardiographic parameters and readmissions was analyzed using the Spearman Rank Correlation. To determine each echocardiographic parameter's cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity, we use Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Results:GLS and GCS are very sensitive and specific parameters in predicting 60-days readmission with an area under the curve (AUC) value > 0.7. This study shows that adding GLS and GCS parameters to the EHFS increases the predicted value (AUC 0.850 vs. 0.820) and sensitivity to 79%. Conclusion: GLS and GCS parameters additional on EHFS can help predict 60-days readmission of heart failure patients with sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 83%, respectively. The present study shows that with higher GLS and GCS scores on the EHFS, the risk of readmission in heart failure patients will increase.","PeriodicalId":266369,"journal":{"name":"Nusantara Medical Science Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Longitudinal Strain and Global Circumferential Strain on Echo Heart Failure Score as 60-days Readmission Predictor in Congestive Heart Failure Patients with Left Ventricle Systolic Dysfunction in Makassar City\",\"authors\":\"A. Muzakkir, Muzakkir Amir, P. Kabo, K. Saleh, Burhanuddin Bahar, A. F. Ghaznawie, F. A. Tandean, Idar Mappangara\",\"doi\":\"10.20956/nmsj.v6i1.14674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The readmission rate due to heart failure increases every year in South Sulawesi. A Frequently used method for assessing readmission is an echocardiographic examination by measuring ejection fraction. However, recent studies show that the speckle tracking parameters are more sensitive to predict readmission of heart failure patients. In this study, we assess the role of Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) and Global Circumferential Strain (GCS) parameters on the Echo Heart Failure Score (EHFS) as a 60-days readmission predictor in heart failure patients. Methods: We included 175 patients admitted through the inpatient installation of Integrated Heart Center Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo General Hospital. In addition, we reviewed up to 60 days after outpatient prospectively by collecting data through medical records. The correlation between echocardiographic parameters and readmissions was analyzed using the Spearman Rank Correlation. To determine each echocardiographic parameter's cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity, we use Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Results:GLS and GCS are very sensitive and specific parameters in predicting 60-days readmission with an area under the curve (AUC) value > 0.7. This study shows that adding GLS and GCS parameters to the EHFS increases the predicted value (AUC 0.850 vs. 0.820) and sensitivity to 79%. Conclusion: GLS and GCS parameters additional on EHFS can help predict 60-days readmission of heart failure patients with sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 83%, respectively. The present study shows that with higher GLS and GCS scores on the EHFS, the risk of readmission in heart failure patients will increase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":266369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nusantara Medical Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nusantara Medical Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20956/nmsj.v6i1.14674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nusantara Medical Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20956/nmsj.v6i1.14674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在南苏拉威西,因心力衰竭而再次入院的比率每年都在增加。一种常用的评估再入院的方法是通过测量射血分数进行超声心动图检查。然而,最近的研究表明,斑点跟踪参数对预测心力衰竭患者再入院更为敏感。在这项研究中,我们评估了全球纵向应变(GLS)和全球圆周应变(GCS)参数在心力衰竭患者的回声心力衰竭评分(EHFS)中的作用,作为60天再入院的预测指标。方法:我们纳入175例通过Wahidin Sudirohusodo综合医院综合心脏中心住院的患者。此外,我们通过病历收集数据,前瞻性地回顾了门诊后60天的情况。采用Spearman秩相关分析超声心动图参数与再入院的相关性。为了确定每个超声心动图参数的分界点、灵敏度和特异性,我们使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。结果:GLS和GCS是预测60天再入院非常敏感和特异的参数,曲线下面积(AUC)值> 0.7。本研究表明,在EHFS中加入GLS和GCS参数可将预测值(AUC 0.850 vs. 0.820)和灵敏度提高到79%。结论:在EHFS基础上附加GLS和GCS参数预测心力衰竭患者60天再入院的敏感性和特异性分别为79%和83%。本研究表明,心衰患者再入院的GLS和GCS评分越高,再入院的风险越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Longitudinal Strain and Global Circumferential Strain on Echo Heart Failure Score as 60-days Readmission Predictor in Congestive Heart Failure Patients with Left Ventricle Systolic Dysfunction in Makassar City
Introduction: The readmission rate due to heart failure increases every year in South Sulawesi. A Frequently used method for assessing readmission is an echocardiographic examination by measuring ejection fraction. However, recent studies show that the speckle tracking parameters are more sensitive to predict readmission of heart failure patients. In this study, we assess the role of Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) and Global Circumferential Strain (GCS) parameters on the Echo Heart Failure Score (EHFS) as a 60-days readmission predictor in heart failure patients. Methods: We included 175 patients admitted through the inpatient installation of Integrated Heart Center Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo General Hospital. In addition, we reviewed up to 60 days after outpatient prospectively by collecting data through medical records. The correlation between echocardiographic parameters and readmissions was analyzed using the Spearman Rank Correlation. To determine each echocardiographic parameter's cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity, we use Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Results:GLS and GCS are very sensitive and specific parameters in predicting 60-days readmission with an area under the curve (AUC) value > 0.7. This study shows that adding GLS and GCS parameters to the EHFS increases the predicted value (AUC 0.850 vs. 0.820) and sensitivity to 79%. Conclusion: GLS and GCS parameters additional on EHFS can help predict 60-days readmission of heart failure patients with sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 83%, respectively. The present study shows that with higher GLS and GCS scores on the EHFS, the risk of readmission in heart failure patients will increase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信