装配工艺对弹体弹道性能影响的计算评价——弹体尺寸与阻力系数的非线性关系

Krzysztof Piasta, P. Kupidura, J. Michalski
{"title":"装配工艺对弹体弹道性能影响的计算评价——弹体尺寸与阻力系数的非线性关系","authors":"Krzysztof Piasta, P. Kupidura, J. Michalski","doi":"10.7862/tiam.2023.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The continuous development of production and assembly techniques gives rise to the idea of following a new approach in the small-arms ammunition design process. Commonly used intermediate cartridges were designed over 60 years ago, and their construction and assembly processes are not significantly different than what was available almost a century ago. Along with the recent development of individual protection devices and with the general availability of modern ballistic plates utilized in plate carriers type of individual armor, it sparks the necessity of designing a new, intermediate cartridge, using new assembly and technology methods. The vital aspect of the ammunition design process is a determination of the materials utilized in bullet elements and its assembly method. Therefore, there is a necessity of evaluating if different assembly techniques can provide the improved ballistic performance of a bullet. The paper includes a comparison of two differently assembled projectiles with steel penetrators: a standard Full Metal Jacket and a reverse-drawn Semi-Jacketed bullet. The designs were evaluated in terms of their external ballistic performance for specific initial conditions using 2D Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations and, separately, with a semi-empirical method. The paper aimed to assess the influence of the assembly method on the bullet’s external ballistic performance. Both calculations revealed a nonlinear relation between the projectile méplat diameter and the coefficient of drag, which indicates a limit where the méplat size reduction is beneficial. The results implicate a perspective bullet construction that would provide the user with better external ballistic performance, more consistent and precise than a standard Full Metal Jacket design.","PeriodicalId":224295,"journal":{"name":"Technologia i Automatyzacja Montażu","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational evaluation of assembly technique influence on ballistic performance of a bullet – non-linear relation between méplat size and the drag coefficient\",\"authors\":\"Krzysztof Piasta, P. Kupidura, J. Michalski\",\"doi\":\"10.7862/tiam.2023.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The continuous development of production and assembly techniques gives rise to the idea of following a new approach in the small-arms ammunition design process. Commonly used intermediate cartridges were designed over 60 years ago, and their construction and assembly processes are not significantly different than what was available almost a century ago. Along with the recent development of individual protection devices and with the general availability of modern ballistic plates utilized in plate carriers type of individual armor, it sparks the necessity of designing a new, intermediate cartridge, using new assembly and technology methods. The vital aspect of the ammunition design process is a determination of the materials utilized in bullet elements and its assembly method. Therefore, there is a necessity of evaluating if different assembly techniques can provide the improved ballistic performance of a bullet. The paper includes a comparison of two differently assembled projectiles with steel penetrators: a standard Full Metal Jacket and a reverse-drawn Semi-Jacketed bullet. The designs were evaluated in terms of their external ballistic performance for specific initial conditions using 2D Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations and, separately, with a semi-empirical method. The paper aimed to assess the influence of the assembly method on the bullet’s external ballistic performance. Both calculations revealed a nonlinear relation between the projectile méplat diameter and the coefficient of drag, which indicates a limit where the méplat size reduction is beneficial. The results implicate a perspective bullet construction that would provide the user with better external ballistic performance, more consistent and precise than a standard Full Metal Jacket design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technologia i Automatyzacja Montażu\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technologia i Automatyzacja Montażu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7862/tiam.2023.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technologia i Automatyzacja Montażu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7862/tiam.2023.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生产和装配技术的不断发展产生了在小武器弹药设计过程中采用一种新方法的想法。常用的中间墨盒是在60多年前设计的,它们的结构和组装过程与近一个世纪前的情况没有显着不同。随着个人防护装置的最新发展和现代弹道板的普遍可用性,在板载式个人装甲中使用,它激发了设计一种新的中间弹药筒的必要性,使用新的装配和技术方法。弹药设计过程的关键是确定弹体元件所用材料及其装配方法。因此,有必要评估不同的装配技术是否可以提高子弹的弹道性能。这篇论文包括了两种不同装配的带有钢穿甲弹的弹丸的比较:一种标准的全金属护套弹和一种反抽的半护套弹。在特定初始条件下,利用二维计算流体动力学模拟和半经验方法分别评估了这些设计的外弹道性能。本文旨在评估装配方式对子弹外弹道性能的影响。两种计算都揭示了弹丸直径与阻力系数之间的非线性关系,这表明了减小弹丸直径是有益的。结果表明,透视子弹结构将为用户提供更好的外弹道性能,比标准的全金属护套设计更一致和精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computational evaluation of assembly technique influence on ballistic performance of a bullet – non-linear relation between méplat size and the drag coefficient
The continuous development of production and assembly techniques gives rise to the idea of following a new approach in the small-arms ammunition design process. Commonly used intermediate cartridges were designed over 60 years ago, and their construction and assembly processes are not significantly different than what was available almost a century ago. Along with the recent development of individual protection devices and with the general availability of modern ballistic plates utilized in plate carriers type of individual armor, it sparks the necessity of designing a new, intermediate cartridge, using new assembly and technology methods. The vital aspect of the ammunition design process is a determination of the materials utilized in bullet elements and its assembly method. Therefore, there is a necessity of evaluating if different assembly techniques can provide the improved ballistic performance of a bullet. The paper includes a comparison of two differently assembled projectiles with steel penetrators: a standard Full Metal Jacket and a reverse-drawn Semi-Jacketed bullet. The designs were evaluated in terms of their external ballistic performance for specific initial conditions using 2D Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations and, separately, with a semi-empirical method. The paper aimed to assess the influence of the assembly method on the bullet’s external ballistic performance. Both calculations revealed a nonlinear relation between the projectile méplat diameter and the coefficient of drag, which indicates a limit where the méplat size reduction is beneficial. The results implicate a perspective bullet construction that would provide the user with better external ballistic performance, more consistent and precise than a standard Full Metal Jacket design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信