真实科学与人文学科教学中的学生视角比较研究

Iulia-Adelina Ghiță
{"title":"真实科学与人文学科教学中的学生视角比较研究","authors":"Iulia-Adelina Ghiță","doi":"10.51865/jetc.2022.2.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A current issue is the finality of education. Many teachers in pre-university education limit themselves in the instructive-educational process to strictly following the school programs, creating personal portfolios, and omitting to pay attention to the quality of the process itself. The relationship between the three types of curriculum taught-learned-evaluated- raises an alarm signal regarding the informational baggage that students are left with at the end of a lesson, a cycle, or a level of schooling. Currently, education aims to achieve the educational ideal which presupposes: “the free, integral, and harmonious development of the human individual, in the formation of an autonomous personality and the assumption of a system of values necessary for personal fulfillment and development, for the development of an entrepreneurial spirit, for active citizenship participation in society, for social inclusion, and employment on the labor market” (LEN no.1/2011, art. 2, para.3). In this sense, it is necessary to reconsider the role that teachers hold in the development of an individual who conforms to the desired societal model. Moreover, the perception that students have concerning certain subjects is projected onto the teacher's image.","PeriodicalId":226194,"journal":{"name":"JUS ET CIVITAS A Journal of Social and Legal Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Perspective on Teaching and Learning in Real Science and Humanities: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Iulia-Adelina Ghiță\",\"doi\":\"10.51865/jetc.2022.2.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A current issue is the finality of education. Many teachers in pre-university education limit themselves in the instructive-educational process to strictly following the school programs, creating personal portfolios, and omitting to pay attention to the quality of the process itself. The relationship between the three types of curriculum taught-learned-evaluated- raises an alarm signal regarding the informational baggage that students are left with at the end of a lesson, a cycle, or a level of schooling. Currently, education aims to achieve the educational ideal which presupposes: “the free, integral, and harmonious development of the human individual, in the formation of an autonomous personality and the assumption of a system of values necessary for personal fulfillment and development, for the development of an entrepreneurial spirit, for active citizenship participation in society, for social inclusion, and employment on the labor market” (LEN no.1/2011, art. 2, para.3). In this sense, it is necessary to reconsider the role that teachers hold in the development of an individual who conforms to the desired societal model. Moreover, the perception that students have concerning certain subjects is projected onto the teacher's image.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JUS ET CIVITAS A Journal of Social and Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JUS ET CIVITAS A Journal of Social and Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51865/jetc.2022.2.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JUS ET CIVITAS A Journal of Social and Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51865/jetc.2022.2.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前的一个问题是教育的终结性。在大学预科教育中,许多教师把自己局限在教学过程中,严格遵循学校的计划,创建个人档案,而忽略了过程本身的质量。教-学-评估这三种课程类型之间的关系,为学生在一节课、一个周期或一个层次的学校教育结束时留下的信息包袱敲响了警钟。目前,教育的目标是实现教育理想,其前提是:“人类个体的自由、完整和和谐发展,形成自主人格,并假设个人实现和发展所必需的价值体系,发展创业精神,积极参与社会,社会包容,并在劳动力市场上就业”(LEN no。1/2011,艺术。2、适)。从这个意义上说,有必要重新考虑教师在培养符合理想社会模式的个人方面所扮演的角色。此外,学生对某些科目的看法被投射到教师的形象上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student Perspective on Teaching and Learning in Real Science and Humanities: A Comparative Study
A current issue is the finality of education. Many teachers in pre-university education limit themselves in the instructive-educational process to strictly following the school programs, creating personal portfolios, and omitting to pay attention to the quality of the process itself. The relationship between the three types of curriculum taught-learned-evaluated- raises an alarm signal regarding the informational baggage that students are left with at the end of a lesson, a cycle, or a level of schooling. Currently, education aims to achieve the educational ideal which presupposes: “the free, integral, and harmonious development of the human individual, in the formation of an autonomous personality and the assumption of a system of values necessary for personal fulfillment and development, for the development of an entrepreneurial spirit, for active citizenship participation in society, for social inclusion, and employment on the labor market” (LEN no.1/2011, art. 2, para.3). In this sense, it is necessary to reconsider the role that teachers hold in the development of an individual who conforms to the desired societal model. Moreover, the perception that students have concerning certain subjects is projected onto the teacher's image.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信