技术综合形成性评价:对学生化学平衡概念知识和动机的影响

Tadesse Hagos, Dereje Andargie
{"title":"技术综合形成性评价:对学生化学平衡概念知识和动机的影响","authors":"Tadesse Hagos, Dereje Andargie","doi":"10.26740/jcer.v6n1.p26-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of technology integrated formative assessment strategies on students’ conceptual knowledge and their motivation in chemical equilibrium. Quasi-experimental control group interrupted time series design was employed. Data were collected from 132 students which were selected using multistage random sampling technique from three governmental secondary schools. Two experimental (Technology Integrated Formative Assessment (TIFA) and Formative Assessment (FA) alone) and one comparison groups were involved in the study. A series of chemical equilibrium conceptual tests and motivation questionnaire were used to collect data. One-way ANOVA and Mixed model ANOVA were used to analyze the test scores.  There was a statistically significant difference between groups in posttest on conceptual plus remembering (F (2,129) = 3.52, p=.033), understanding (F (2,129) = 4.70, p=.033), applying (F (2, 129) = 20.35, p<.001) and their motivation (F (2, 129) = 12.375, p< .001). However, there were no statistically significant differences among groups in posttest on conceptual plus analysis (F (2, 129) = 1.10, p = .335) and evaluating (F (2,129) = 3.03, p = .052). There was also an interaction effect between treatment and time point on the conceptual test scores. It was concluded that TIFA more effective in facilitating students’ conceptual knowledge and motivation in learning chemical equilibrium than the two other groups. The researchers recommended that chemistry teachers should adapt TIFA as a teaching strategy in chemistry classrooms and laboratories.  They are also recommended that teachers should incorporate it into their classes to enhance students’ motivation. \n  \nKey Words: Conceptual knowledge, Formative assessment, Motivation, Technology \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":444789,"journal":{"name":"JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology Integrated Formative Assessment: Effects on Students’ Conceptual Knowledge and Motivation in Chemical Equilibrium\",\"authors\":\"Tadesse Hagos, Dereje Andargie\",\"doi\":\"10.26740/jcer.v6n1.p26-43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of technology integrated formative assessment strategies on students’ conceptual knowledge and their motivation in chemical equilibrium. Quasi-experimental control group interrupted time series design was employed. Data were collected from 132 students which were selected using multistage random sampling technique from three governmental secondary schools. Two experimental (Technology Integrated Formative Assessment (TIFA) and Formative Assessment (FA) alone) and one comparison groups were involved in the study. A series of chemical equilibrium conceptual tests and motivation questionnaire were used to collect data. One-way ANOVA and Mixed model ANOVA were used to analyze the test scores.  There was a statistically significant difference between groups in posttest on conceptual plus remembering (F (2,129) = 3.52, p=.033), understanding (F (2,129) = 4.70, p=.033), applying (F (2, 129) = 20.35, p<.001) and their motivation (F (2, 129) = 12.375, p< .001). However, there were no statistically significant differences among groups in posttest on conceptual plus analysis (F (2, 129) = 1.10, p = .335) and evaluating (F (2,129) = 3.03, p = .052). There was also an interaction effect between treatment and time point on the conceptual test scores. It was concluded that TIFA more effective in facilitating students’ conceptual knowledge and motivation in learning chemical equilibrium than the two other groups. The researchers recommended that chemistry teachers should adapt TIFA as a teaching strategy in chemistry classrooms and laboratories.  They are also recommended that teachers should incorporate it into their classes to enhance students’ motivation. \\n  \\nKey Words: Conceptual knowledge, Formative assessment, Motivation, Technology \\n  \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":444789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v6n1.p26-43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v6n1.p26-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的主要目的是评估技术整合形成性评估策略对学生化学平衡概念知识及其动机的影响。采用准实验对照组间断时间序列设计。采用多阶段随机抽样的方法,从三所公办中学选取132名学生进行数据收集。本研究分为两个实验组(技术综合形成性评价组(TIFA)和单独形成性评价组(FA))和一个对照组。采用一系列的化学平衡概念测试和动机问卷来收集数据。采用单因素方差分析和混合模型方差分析对考试成绩进行分析。在概念加记忆(F (2129) = 3.52, p= 0.033)、理解(F (2129) = 4.70, p= 0.033)、应用(F (2,129) = 20.35, p< 0.001)和动机(F (2,129) = 12.375, p< 0.001)方面,组间后测差异有统计学意义。但在概念加分析(F (2,129) = 1.10, p = .335)和评价(F (2,129) = 3.03, p = .052)后测中,组间差异无统计学意义。治疗和时间点对概念性测试分数也有交互作用。结果表明,TIFA组在促进学生学习化学平衡的概念知识和动机方面比其他两组更有效。研究人员建议化学教师应将TIFA作为化学课堂和实验室的教学策略。他们还建议教师应将其纳入课堂,以提高学生的积极性。关键词:概念性知识;形成性评价;动机
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology Integrated Formative Assessment: Effects on Students’ Conceptual Knowledge and Motivation in Chemical Equilibrium
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of technology integrated formative assessment strategies on students’ conceptual knowledge and their motivation in chemical equilibrium. Quasi-experimental control group interrupted time series design was employed. Data were collected from 132 students which were selected using multistage random sampling technique from three governmental secondary schools. Two experimental (Technology Integrated Formative Assessment (TIFA) and Formative Assessment (FA) alone) and one comparison groups were involved in the study. A series of chemical equilibrium conceptual tests and motivation questionnaire were used to collect data. One-way ANOVA and Mixed model ANOVA were used to analyze the test scores.  There was a statistically significant difference between groups in posttest on conceptual plus remembering (F (2,129) = 3.52, p=.033), understanding (F (2,129) = 4.70, p=.033), applying (F (2, 129) = 20.35, p<.001) and their motivation (F (2, 129) = 12.375, p< .001). However, there were no statistically significant differences among groups in posttest on conceptual plus analysis (F (2, 129) = 1.10, p = .335) and evaluating (F (2,129) = 3.03, p = .052). There was also an interaction effect between treatment and time point on the conceptual test scores. It was concluded that TIFA more effective in facilitating students’ conceptual knowledge and motivation in learning chemical equilibrium than the two other groups. The researchers recommended that chemistry teachers should adapt TIFA as a teaching strategy in chemistry classrooms and laboratories.  They are also recommended that teachers should incorporate it into their classes to enhance students’ motivation.   Key Words: Conceptual knowledge, Formative assessment, Motivation, Technology    
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信