激光MPEs对角膜和皮肤多脉冲损伤阈值的比较

Mathieu Jean, K. Schulmeister, D. J. Lund, B. Stuck
{"title":"激光MPEs对角膜和皮肤多脉冲损伤阈值的比较","authors":"Mathieu Jean, K. Schulmeister, D. J. Lund, B. Stuck","doi":"10.2351/1.5118641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to current ANSI Z136.1, IEC 60825-1 and ICNIRP guidelines, two exposure limit criteria apply for the cornea and skin: the single pulse limit and the average irradiance limit. The reduction factor CP for repetitively pulsed exposures need only be applied to retinal thermal limits, not to limits to protect the skin and cornea from thermally induced injury. Since only a very limited amount of animal studies for multiple-pulse thresholds are available for the cornea and skin, we have used a computer model to systematically study the threshold trends for exposure to multiple pulses. For a number of representative wavelengths and irradiance diameters, and two pulse durations, injury thresholds as predicted by computer models were compared to the two exposure limit criteria as a function of duty cycle (i.e. repetition rate), number of pulses and as a function of exposure duration. The results support the current multiple-pulse criteria for the cornea and the skin, i.e. no additional reduction of the single pulse limit by CP: for those repetition rates where the single pulse limit is the limiting criterion, the reduction of injury threshold compared to the single pulse is weak. For higher repetition rates, when the average irradiance limit is the limiting criterion the worst case is a cw exposure (duty cycle 100%) and reducing the duty cycle, i.e. pulsed exposure, leads to increased (less critical) thresholds.According to current ANSI Z136.1, IEC 60825-1 and ICNIRP guidelines, two exposure limit criteria apply for the cornea and skin: the single pulse limit and the average irradiance limit. The reduction factor CP for repetitively pulsed exposures need only be applied to retinal thermal limits, not to limits to protect the skin and cornea from thermally induced injury. Since only a very limited amount of animal studies for multiple-pulse thresholds are available for the cornea and skin, we have used a computer model to systematically study the threshold trends for exposure to multiple pulses. For a number of representative wavelengths and irradiance diameters, and two pulse durations, injury thresholds as predicted by computer models were compared to the two exposure limit criteria as a function of duty cycle (i.e. repetition rate), number of pulses and as a function of exposure duration. The results support the current multiple-pulse criteria for the cornea and the skin, i.e. no additional reduction of the si...","PeriodicalId":118257,"journal":{"name":"International Laser Safety Conference","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of cornea and skin multiple pulse injury thresholds with laser MPEs\",\"authors\":\"Mathieu Jean, K. Schulmeister, D. J. Lund, B. Stuck\",\"doi\":\"10.2351/1.5118641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to current ANSI Z136.1, IEC 60825-1 and ICNIRP guidelines, two exposure limit criteria apply for the cornea and skin: the single pulse limit and the average irradiance limit. The reduction factor CP for repetitively pulsed exposures need only be applied to retinal thermal limits, not to limits to protect the skin and cornea from thermally induced injury. Since only a very limited amount of animal studies for multiple-pulse thresholds are available for the cornea and skin, we have used a computer model to systematically study the threshold trends for exposure to multiple pulses. For a number of representative wavelengths and irradiance diameters, and two pulse durations, injury thresholds as predicted by computer models were compared to the two exposure limit criteria as a function of duty cycle (i.e. repetition rate), number of pulses and as a function of exposure duration. The results support the current multiple-pulse criteria for the cornea and the skin, i.e. no additional reduction of the single pulse limit by CP: for those repetition rates where the single pulse limit is the limiting criterion, the reduction of injury threshold compared to the single pulse is weak. For higher repetition rates, when the average irradiance limit is the limiting criterion the worst case is a cw exposure (duty cycle 100%) and reducing the duty cycle, i.e. pulsed exposure, leads to increased (less critical) thresholds.According to current ANSI Z136.1, IEC 60825-1 and ICNIRP guidelines, two exposure limit criteria apply for the cornea and skin: the single pulse limit and the average irradiance limit. The reduction factor CP for repetitively pulsed exposures need only be applied to retinal thermal limits, not to limits to protect the skin and cornea from thermally induced injury. Since only a very limited amount of animal studies for multiple-pulse thresholds are available for the cornea and skin, we have used a computer model to systematically study the threshold trends for exposure to multiple pulses. For a number of representative wavelengths and irradiance diameters, and two pulse durations, injury thresholds as predicted by computer models were compared to the two exposure limit criteria as a function of duty cycle (i.e. repetition rate), number of pulses and as a function of exposure duration. The results support the current multiple-pulse criteria for the cornea and the skin, i.e. no additional reduction of the si...\",\"PeriodicalId\":118257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Laser Safety Conference\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Laser Safety Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2351/1.5118641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Laser Safety Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2351/1.5118641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

根据现行的ANSI Z136.1、IEC 60825-1和ICNIRP指南,适用于角膜和皮肤的两个暴露极限标准:单脉冲极限和平均辐照度极限。重复脉冲暴露的减少因子CP只需要应用于视网膜热极限,而不需要应用于保护皮肤和角膜免受热损伤的极限。由于角膜和皮肤的多脉冲阈值的动物研究数量非常有限,我们使用计算机模型系统地研究了暴露于多脉冲的阈值趋势。对于一些具有代表性的波长和辐照直径以及两种脉冲持续时间,将计算机模型预测的损伤阈值与两种暴露极限标准作为占空比(即重复率)、脉冲数和暴露持续时间的函数进行比较。结果支持当前角膜和皮肤的多脉冲标准,即CP没有额外降低单脉冲限制;对于以单脉冲限制为限制标准的重复率,与单脉冲相比,损伤阈值的降低较弱。对于较高的重复率,当平均辐照极限为限制标准时,最坏的情况是连续曝光(占空比100%),而减少占空比,即脉冲曝光,会导致阈值增加(不那么关键)。根据现行的ANSI Z136.1、IEC 60825-1和ICNIRP指南,适用于角膜和皮肤的两个暴露极限标准:单脉冲极限和平均辐照度极限。重复脉冲暴露的减少因子CP只需要应用于视网膜热极限,而不需要应用于保护皮肤和角膜免受热损伤的极限。由于角膜和皮肤的多脉冲阈值的动物研究数量非常有限,我们使用计算机模型系统地研究了暴露于多脉冲的阈值趋势。对于一些具有代表性的波长和辐照直径以及两种脉冲持续时间,将计算机模型预测的损伤阈值与两种暴露极限标准作为占空比(即重复率)、脉冲数和暴露持续时间的函数进行比较。结果支持当前角膜和皮肤的多脉冲标准,即没有额外的si降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of cornea and skin multiple pulse injury thresholds with laser MPEs
According to current ANSI Z136.1, IEC 60825-1 and ICNIRP guidelines, two exposure limit criteria apply for the cornea and skin: the single pulse limit and the average irradiance limit. The reduction factor CP for repetitively pulsed exposures need only be applied to retinal thermal limits, not to limits to protect the skin and cornea from thermally induced injury. Since only a very limited amount of animal studies for multiple-pulse thresholds are available for the cornea and skin, we have used a computer model to systematically study the threshold trends for exposure to multiple pulses. For a number of representative wavelengths and irradiance diameters, and two pulse durations, injury thresholds as predicted by computer models were compared to the two exposure limit criteria as a function of duty cycle (i.e. repetition rate), number of pulses and as a function of exposure duration. The results support the current multiple-pulse criteria for the cornea and the skin, i.e. no additional reduction of the single pulse limit by CP: for those repetition rates where the single pulse limit is the limiting criterion, the reduction of injury threshold compared to the single pulse is weak. For higher repetition rates, when the average irradiance limit is the limiting criterion the worst case is a cw exposure (duty cycle 100%) and reducing the duty cycle, i.e. pulsed exposure, leads to increased (less critical) thresholds.According to current ANSI Z136.1, IEC 60825-1 and ICNIRP guidelines, two exposure limit criteria apply for the cornea and skin: the single pulse limit and the average irradiance limit. The reduction factor CP for repetitively pulsed exposures need only be applied to retinal thermal limits, not to limits to protect the skin and cornea from thermally induced injury. Since only a very limited amount of animal studies for multiple-pulse thresholds are available for the cornea and skin, we have used a computer model to systematically study the threshold trends for exposure to multiple pulses. For a number of representative wavelengths and irradiance diameters, and two pulse durations, injury thresholds as predicted by computer models were compared to the two exposure limit criteria as a function of duty cycle (i.e. repetition rate), number of pulses and as a function of exposure duration. The results support the current multiple-pulse criteria for the cornea and the skin, i.e. no additional reduction of the si...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信