被逮捕的权利监护听证对象

Mário José Lobato Feitosa, José Carlos Sousa dos, Alessandra Moreira Lima de Aguiar, Diogo de Almeida Viana dos Santos, Alexandre Moura Lima Neto, Edith Maria Barbosa Ramos
{"title":"被逮捕的权利监护听证对象","authors":"Mário José Lobato Feitosa, José Carlos Sousa dos, Alessandra Moreira Lima de Aguiar, Diogo de Almeida Viana dos Santos, Alexandre Moura Lima Neto, Edith Maria Barbosa Ramos","doi":"10.15406/frcij.2023.11.00372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The custody hearing is the act of presenting the arrested citizen, within up to 24 hours, before the judicial authority to verify the regularity of the arrest and the physical condition of the person arrested. This research sought to understand whether this legal procedural instrument has fulfilled the purpose for which it was implemented, which is to guarantee rights, or whether it has reinforced unequal social structures, with the increased stigmatization of certain groups based on skin color or social class. Thus, the aim was to identify the possible criteria used by the Judiciary for granting measures other than imprisonment in the custody hearing, considering the statistics that most people in prison are black and poor. The importance of this research is justified by the relevance of the custody hearing as an instrument for the defense of the fundamental human rights of the arrested subject. The methodology consisted of a qualitative bibliographic and documentary research. The intention was to expand the database on the subject, working as a promoter of the theme, ensuring the inmate the character of a person with rights. Finally, we conclude that the institute of the custody hearing presents itself, in fact, as a mechanism to stimulate unequal social structures that already exist, frustrating its main purpose.","PeriodicalId":150199,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The person arrested as a subject of rights custody hearing\",\"authors\":\"Mário José Lobato Feitosa, José Carlos Sousa dos, Alessandra Moreira Lima de Aguiar, Diogo de Almeida Viana dos Santos, Alexandre Moura Lima Neto, Edith Maria Barbosa Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/frcij.2023.11.00372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The custody hearing is the act of presenting the arrested citizen, within up to 24 hours, before the judicial authority to verify the regularity of the arrest and the physical condition of the person arrested. This research sought to understand whether this legal procedural instrument has fulfilled the purpose for which it was implemented, which is to guarantee rights, or whether it has reinforced unequal social structures, with the increased stigmatization of certain groups based on skin color or social class. Thus, the aim was to identify the possible criteria used by the Judiciary for granting measures other than imprisonment in the custody hearing, considering the statistics that most people in prison are black and poor. The importance of this research is justified by the relevance of the custody hearing as an instrument for the defense of the fundamental human rights of the arrested subject. The methodology consisted of a qualitative bibliographic and documentary research. The intention was to expand the database on the subject, working as a promoter of the theme, ensuring the inmate the character of a person with rights. Finally, we conclude that the institute of the custody hearing presents itself, in fact, as a mechanism to stimulate unequal social structures that already exist, frustrating its main purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/frcij.2023.11.00372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/frcij.2023.11.00372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拘留听证是指在24小时内将被逮捕的公民送交司法机关,以核实逮捕的合法性和被逮捕人的身体状况。这项研究试图了解这项法律程序文书是否实现了其执行的目的,即保障权利,或者它是否加强了不平等的社会结构,使某些群体因肤色或社会阶层而受到更大的侮辱。因此,考虑到监狱中的大多数人是黑人和穷人这一统计数字,目的是确定司法机构在拘留听证会上给予监禁以外的措施时可能使用的标准。这项研究的重要性是合理的,因为羁押听证会是捍卫被捕主体基本人权的一种工具。方法包括定性书目和文献研究。其目的是扩大关于这一主题的数据库,作为这一主题的推动者,确保囚犯具有享有权利的人的性质。最后,我们得出结论,监护听证制度实际上是一种刺激已经存在的不平等社会结构的机制,使其主要目的受挫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The person arrested as a subject of rights custody hearing
The custody hearing is the act of presenting the arrested citizen, within up to 24 hours, before the judicial authority to verify the regularity of the arrest and the physical condition of the person arrested. This research sought to understand whether this legal procedural instrument has fulfilled the purpose for which it was implemented, which is to guarantee rights, or whether it has reinforced unequal social structures, with the increased stigmatization of certain groups based on skin color or social class. Thus, the aim was to identify the possible criteria used by the Judiciary for granting measures other than imprisonment in the custody hearing, considering the statistics that most people in prison are black and poor. The importance of this research is justified by the relevance of the custody hearing as an instrument for the defense of the fundamental human rights of the arrested subject. The methodology consisted of a qualitative bibliographic and documentary research. The intention was to expand the database on the subject, working as a promoter of the theme, ensuring the inmate the character of a person with rights. Finally, we conclude that the institute of the custody hearing presents itself, in fact, as a mechanism to stimulate unequal social structures that already exist, frustrating its main purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信