车辆-基础设施协同实现自动驾驶的经济分析

D. Vignon, Yafeng Yin, S. Bahrami, K. Laberteaux
{"title":"车辆-基础设施协同实现自动驾驶的经济分析","authors":"D. Vignon, Yafeng Yin, S. Bahrami, K. Laberteaux","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3833485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current approach to driving automation has been primarily vehicle-centric. However, a vehicle-infrastructure cooperative approach, in which infrastructure and vehicles cooperate to perform the different driving tasks, may prevail in enabling automated driving. This paper conducts an economic analysis of vehicle infrastructure cooperation for automated driving. In doing so, we present a model that captures investment decisions in vehicle automation and infrastructure digitalization and their effect on travellers’ purchase and travel decisions. Our analysis shows that, under certain conditions, equipping both infrastructure and vehicles is socially optimal. However, by analyzing strategic interactions between infrastructure support service providers and automakers, we show that lack of coordination between these two actors results in suboptimal investment in vehicle automation and infrastructure digitalization. Especially, when these two technologies are complementary, service providers are reluctant to invest in digital infrastructure and vehicle manufacturers tend to over equip their vehicles so as to avoid relying on infrastructure technology. Thus, we conclude by showing that better coordination between automakers and service providers–under the form of profit sharing–is welfare improving and could potentially yield the socially optimal levels of automation and digitalization.","PeriodicalId":382677,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Market Structure (Industrial) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Analysis of Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative Approach for Enabling Automated Driving\",\"authors\":\"D. Vignon, Yafeng Yin, S. Bahrami, K. Laberteaux\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3833485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current approach to driving automation has been primarily vehicle-centric. However, a vehicle-infrastructure cooperative approach, in which infrastructure and vehicles cooperate to perform the different driving tasks, may prevail in enabling automated driving. This paper conducts an economic analysis of vehicle infrastructure cooperation for automated driving. In doing so, we present a model that captures investment decisions in vehicle automation and infrastructure digitalization and their effect on travellers’ purchase and travel decisions. Our analysis shows that, under certain conditions, equipping both infrastructure and vehicles is socially optimal. However, by analyzing strategic interactions between infrastructure support service providers and automakers, we show that lack of coordination between these two actors results in suboptimal investment in vehicle automation and infrastructure digitalization. Especially, when these two technologies are complementary, service providers are reluctant to invest in digital infrastructure and vehicle manufacturers tend to over equip their vehicles so as to avoid relying on infrastructure technology. Thus, we conclude by showing that better coordination between automakers and service providers–under the form of profit sharing–is welfare improving and could potentially yield the socially optimal levels of automation and digitalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERPN: Market Structure (Industrial) (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERPN: Market Structure (Industrial) (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3833485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Market Structure (Industrial) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3833485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的自动驾驶方法主要以车辆为中心。然而,车辆与基础设施合作的方法,即基础设施和车辆合作执行不同的驾驶任务,可能会在实现自动驾驶方面占上风。本文对自动驾驶车辆基础设施合作进行了经济分析。在此过程中,我们提出了一个模型,该模型捕捉了车辆自动化和基础设施数字化的投资决策及其对旅行者购买和旅行决策的影响。我们的分析表明,在某些条件下,同时装备基础设施和车辆是社会最优的。然而,通过分析基础设施支持服务提供商和汽车制造商之间的战略互动,我们发现这两个参与者之间缺乏协调导致车辆自动化和基础设施数字化的投资不理想。特别是当这两种技术互补时,服务提供商不愿意投资于数字基础设施,汽车制造商倾向于过度装备车辆,以避免依赖基础设施技术。因此,我们的结论是,在利润分享的形式下,汽车制造商和服务提供商之间更好的协调是福利的改善,并可能产生社会最优的自动化和数字化水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic Analysis of Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative Approach for Enabling Automated Driving
The current approach to driving automation has been primarily vehicle-centric. However, a vehicle-infrastructure cooperative approach, in which infrastructure and vehicles cooperate to perform the different driving tasks, may prevail in enabling automated driving. This paper conducts an economic analysis of vehicle infrastructure cooperation for automated driving. In doing so, we present a model that captures investment decisions in vehicle automation and infrastructure digitalization and their effect on travellers’ purchase and travel decisions. Our analysis shows that, under certain conditions, equipping both infrastructure and vehicles is socially optimal. However, by analyzing strategic interactions between infrastructure support service providers and automakers, we show that lack of coordination between these two actors results in suboptimal investment in vehicle automation and infrastructure digitalization. Especially, when these two technologies are complementary, service providers are reluctant to invest in digital infrastructure and vehicle manufacturers tend to over equip their vehicles so as to avoid relying on infrastructure technology. Thus, we conclude by showing that better coordination between automakers and service providers–under the form of profit sharing–is welfare improving and could potentially yield the socially optimal levels of automation and digitalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信