行为

A. Lang
{"title":"行为","authors":"A. Lang","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt20krzg8.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Confederates and Unionists would never achieve their stated national purposes without the triumph of their respective armies. Each nation’s standing—including emancipation in the United States—depended entirely on the conduct of military institutions populated largely by common citizens of each republic. This chapter demonstrates how each government subscribed to notions of just war theory: how nations justified, explained, limited, and expanded military conduct in accordance with the laws of war and the self-defined standards of “civilization.” To exceed or ignore a just war delegitimized a national cause before a reproving global community. Both the United States and Confederacy claimed principal standing among the western community of nations, influencing how both republics restrained military conduct while always being mindful that escalation and destruction necessitated legal and martial justification. Ultimately, the chapter questions the veracity of the American Civil War as a “total war,” contributing to a decades-long scholarly debate.","PeriodicalId":262145,"journal":{"name":"A Contest of Civilizations","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conduct\",\"authors\":\"A. Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctt20krzg8.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Confederates and Unionists would never achieve their stated national purposes without the triumph of their respective armies. Each nation’s standing—including emancipation in the United States—depended entirely on the conduct of military institutions populated largely by common citizens of each republic. This chapter demonstrates how each government subscribed to notions of just war theory: how nations justified, explained, limited, and expanded military conduct in accordance with the laws of war and the self-defined standards of “civilization.” To exceed or ignore a just war delegitimized a national cause before a reproving global community. Both the United States and Confederacy claimed principal standing among the western community of nations, influencing how both republics restrained military conduct while always being mindful that escalation and destruction necessitated legal and martial justification. Ultimately, the chapter questions the veracity of the American Civil War as a “total war,” contributing to a decades-long scholarly debate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Contest of Civilizations\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Contest of Civilizations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20krzg8.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Contest of Civilizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20krzg8.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

如果没有各自军队的胜利,邦联派和统一派永远无法实现他们所宣称的国家目标。每个国家的地位——包括美国的解放——完全取决于军事机构的行为,这些机构主要由每个共和国的普通公民组成。本章展示了各国政府如何认同正义战争理论的概念:各国如何根据战争法和自我定义的“文明”标准来证明、解释、限制和扩大军事行为。超越或忽视一场正义的战争,会使一项国家事业在受到谴责的国际社会面前失去合法性。美国和南部邦联都声称在西方国际社会中具有主要地位,影响两个共和国如何限制军事行为,同时始终注意到升级和破坏需要法律和军事理由。最后,这一章质疑美国内战是一场“全面战争”的真实性,引发了长达数十年的学术辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conduct
Confederates and Unionists would never achieve their stated national purposes without the triumph of their respective armies. Each nation’s standing—including emancipation in the United States—depended entirely on the conduct of military institutions populated largely by common citizens of each republic. This chapter demonstrates how each government subscribed to notions of just war theory: how nations justified, explained, limited, and expanded military conduct in accordance with the laws of war and the self-defined standards of “civilization.” To exceed or ignore a just war delegitimized a national cause before a reproving global community. Both the United States and Confederacy claimed principal standing among the western community of nations, influencing how both republics restrained military conduct while always being mindful that escalation and destruction necessitated legal and martial justification. Ultimately, the chapter questions the veracity of the American Civil War as a “total war,” contributing to a decades-long scholarly debate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信