{"title":"从方向图测量得到的峰值增益和指向性估计精度","authors":"Maryam Razmhosseini, R. Vaughan","doi":"10.1109/ANTEM.2016.7550168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a comparison between different near-field measurement techniques for antenna gain and directivity estimations. Several gain measurement techniques exist including comparison gain and direct gain, which have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of accuracy, cost and measurement time. In this study, the comparison gain technique is used. In addition, three different near-field measurement methods including planar, cylindrical and spherical have been compared for antenna gain and directivity estimation.","PeriodicalId":447985,"journal":{"name":"2016 17th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peak gain and directivity estimation accuracy from pattern measurement\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Razmhosseini, R. Vaughan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ANTEM.2016.7550168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a comparison between different near-field measurement techniques for antenna gain and directivity estimations. Several gain measurement techniques exist including comparison gain and direct gain, which have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of accuracy, cost and measurement time. In this study, the comparison gain technique is used. In addition, three different near-field measurement methods including planar, cylindrical and spherical have been compared for antenna gain and directivity estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 17th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 17th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTEM.2016.7550168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 17th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTEM.2016.7550168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peak gain and directivity estimation accuracy from pattern measurement
This paper provides a comparison between different near-field measurement techniques for antenna gain and directivity estimations. Several gain measurement techniques exist including comparison gain and direct gain, which have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of accuracy, cost and measurement time. In this study, the comparison gain technique is used. In addition, three different near-field measurement methods including planar, cylindrical and spherical have been compared for antenna gain and directivity estimation.