最优潮流研究中TCSC建模方法的比较评价

S. Sreejith, S. P. Simon, M. Selvan
{"title":"最优潮流研究中TCSC建模方法的比较评价","authors":"S. Sreejith, S. P. Simon, M. Selvan","doi":"10.1109/EPSCICON.2012.6175241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative evaluation of optimal power flow analysis incorporating Thyristor controller Series compensator using both variable reactance and firing angle model. In reactance model the TCSC is modeled as a variable reactance and in firing angle model nodal admittance matrix is firing angle dependent, which then incorporated into the existing optimal power flow algorithm. The reactance value of the TCSC is taken as the state variable in the former model and the firing angle is taken as the state variable in the later model. A comparative evaluation is carried out in terms of bus voltage, angle, power flow, active power loss and power generation cost for both variable reactance model and Firing Angle model which is validated on 5 bus test system and IEEE 30 bus test system using Newton's method.","PeriodicalId":143947,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Power, Signals, Controls and Computation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of modelling methods for TCSC in optimal power flow studies\",\"authors\":\"S. Sreejith, S. P. Simon, M. Selvan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EPSCICON.2012.6175241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative evaluation of optimal power flow analysis incorporating Thyristor controller Series compensator using both variable reactance and firing angle model. In reactance model the TCSC is modeled as a variable reactance and in firing angle model nodal admittance matrix is firing angle dependent, which then incorporated into the existing optimal power flow algorithm. The reactance value of the TCSC is taken as the state variable in the former model and the firing angle is taken as the state variable in the later model. A comparative evaluation is carried out in terms of bus voltage, angle, power flow, active power loss and power generation cost for both variable reactance model and Firing Angle model which is validated on 5 bus test system and IEEE 30 bus test system using Newton's method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 International Conference on Power, Signals, Controls and Computation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 International Conference on Power, Signals, Controls and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPSCICON.2012.6175241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Power, Signals, Controls and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPSCICON.2012.6175241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文对采用可变电抗和发射角模型的可控硅控制器串联补偿器的最优潮流分析进行了比较评价。在电抗模型中,采用变电抗的方式建立TCSC模型,在发射角模型中,节点导纳矩阵与发射角相关,并将其纳入现有的最优潮流算法中。在前一种模型中以TCSC的电抗值为状态变量,在后一种模型中以发射角为状态变量。采用牛顿法对变电抗模型和发射角模型在母线电压、角度、潮流、有功功率损耗和发电成本等方面进行了对比评价,并在5母线测试系统和IEEE 30母线测试系统上进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of modelling methods for TCSC in optimal power flow studies
This paper presents a comparative evaluation of optimal power flow analysis incorporating Thyristor controller Series compensator using both variable reactance and firing angle model. In reactance model the TCSC is modeled as a variable reactance and in firing angle model nodal admittance matrix is firing angle dependent, which then incorporated into the existing optimal power flow algorithm. The reactance value of the TCSC is taken as the state variable in the former model and the firing angle is taken as the state variable in the later model. A comparative evaluation is carried out in terms of bus voltage, angle, power flow, active power loss and power generation cost for both variable reactance model and Firing Angle model which is validated on 5 bus test system and IEEE 30 bus test system using Newton's method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信